Cargando…

Implementation of neurological group-based telerehabilitation within existing healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods evaluation

BACKGROUND: There is a need to evaluate if and how telerehabilitation approaches might co-exist within healthcare in the long-term. Our aim was to implement and evaluate a multidisciplinary group-based telerehabilitation approach for people engaging in neurological rehabilitation. METHODS: NeuroReha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ackerley, Suzanne, Wilson, Neil, Boland, Paul, Read, Jessica, Connell, Louise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10283243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09635-w
_version_ 1785061268838678528
author Ackerley, Suzanne
Wilson, Neil
Boland, Paul
Read, Jessica
Connell, Louise
author_facet Ackerley, Suzanne
Wilson, Neil
Boland, Paul
Read, Jessica
Connell, Louise
author_sort Ackerley, Suzanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a need to evaluate if and how telerehabilitation approaches might co-exist within healthcare in the long-term. Our aim was to implement and evaluate a multidisciplinary group-based telerehabilitation approach for people engaging in neurological rehabilitation. METHODS: NeuroRehabilitation OnLine (NROL) was adapted and implemented within an existing healthcare system as a programme of repeating six-week blocks. A robust evaluation was undertaken simultaneously using a convergent parallel design underpinned by implementation frameworks. This included service data, and patient and staff interviews. Implementation success was conceptualised using the outcomes of appropriateness, acceptability and sustainability. RESULTS: Eight NROL blocks delivered 265 sessions with 1347 patient contacts, and NROL continues as part of standard practice. The approach was appropriate for varied demographics and had positive patient opinions and outcomes for many. Staff perceived NROL provided a compatible means to increase therapy and help meet targets, despite needing to mitigate some challenges when fitting the approach within the existing system. NROL was considered acceptable due to good attendance (68%), low drop-out (12%), and a good safety record (one non-injury fall). It was accepted as a new way of working across rehabilitation disciplines as an ‘extra layer of therapy’. NROL had perceived advantages in terms of patient and staff resource (e.g. saving time, energy and travel). NROL provided staffing efficiencies (ratio 0.6) compared to one-to-one delivery. Technology difficulties and reluctance were surmountable with dedicated technology assistance. Leadership commitment was considered key to enable the efforts needed for implementation and sustained use. CONCLUSION: Pragmatic implementation of group-based telerehabilitation was possible as an adjunct to neurological rehabilitation within an existing healthcare system. The compelling advantages reported of having NROL as part of rehabilitation supports the continued use of this telerehabilitation approach. This project provides an exemplar of how evaluation can be run concurrently with implementation, applying a data driven rather than anecdotal approach to implementation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09635-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10283243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102832432023-06-22 Implementation of neurological group-based telerehabilitation within existing healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods evaluation Ackerley, Suzanne Wilson, Neil Boland, Paul Read, Jessica Connell, Louise BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a need to evaluate if and how telerehabilitation approaches might co-exist within healthcare in the long-term. Our aim was to implement and evaluate a multidisciplinary group-based telerehabilitation approach for people engaging in neurological rehabilitation. METHODS: NeuroRehabilitation OnLine (NROL) was adapted and implemented within an existing healthcare system as a programme of repeating six-week blocks. A robust evaluation was undertaken simultaneously using a convergent parallel design underpinned by implementation frameworks. This included service data, and patient and staff interviews. Implementation success was conceptualised using the outcomes of appropriateness, acceptability and sustainability. RESULTS: Eight NROL blocks delivered 265 sessions with 1347 patient contacts, and NROL continues as part of standard practice. The approach was appropriate for varied demographics and had positive patient opinions and outcomes for many. Staff perceived NROL provided a compatible means to increase therapy and help meet targets, despite needing to mitigate some challenges when fitting the approach within the existing system. NROL was considered acceptable due to good attendance (68%), low drop-out (12%), and a good safety record (one non-injury fall). It was accepted as a new way of working across rehabilitation disciplines as an ‘extra layer of therapy’. NROL had perceived advantages in terms of patient and staff resource (e.g. saving time, energy and travel). NROL provided staffing efficiencies (ratio 0.6) compared to one-to-one delivery. Technology difficulties and reluctance were surmountable with dedicated technology assistance. Leadership commitment was considered key to enable the efforts needed for implementation and sustained use. CONCLUSION: Pragmatic implementation of group-based telerehabilitation was possible as an adjunct to neurological rehabilitation within an existing healthcare system. The compelling advantages reported of having NROL as part of rehabilitation supports the continued use of this telerehabilitation approach. This project provides an exemplar of how evaluation can be run concurrently with implementation, applying a data driven rather than anecdotal approach to implementation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09635-w. BioMed Central 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10283243/ /pubmed/37344774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09635-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ackerley, Suzanne
Wilson, Neil
Boland, Paul
Read, Jessica
Connell, Louise
Implementation of neurological group-based telerehabilitation within existing healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods evaluation
title Implementation of neurological group-based telerehabilitation within existing healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods evaluation
title_full Implementation of neurological group-based telerehabilitation within existing healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods evaluation
title_fullStr Implementation of neurological group-based telerehabilitation within existing healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of neurological group-based telerehabilitation within existing healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods evaluation
title_short Implementation of neurological group-based telerehabilitation within existing healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods evaluation
title_sort implementation of neurological group-based telerehabilitation within existing healthcare during the covid-19 pandemic: a mixed methods evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10283243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09635-w
work_keys_str_mv AT ackerleysuzanne implementationofneurologicalgroupbasedtelerehabilitationwithinexistinghealthcareduringthecovid19pandemicamixedmethodsevaluation
AT wilsonneil implementationofneurologicalgroupbasedtelerehabilitationwithinexistinghealthcareduringthecovid19pandemicamixedmethodsevaluation
AT bolandpaul implementationofneurologicalgroupbasedtelerehabilitationwithinexistinghealthcareduringthecovid19pandemicamixedmethodsevaluation
AT readjessica implementationofneurologicalgroupbasedtelerehabilitationwithinexistinghealthcareduringthecovid19pandemicamixedmethodsevaluation
AT connelllouise implementationofneurologicalgroupbasedtelerehabilitationwithinexistinghealthcareduringthecovid19pandemicamixedmethodsevaluation