Cargando…

Clinical effectiveness of rehabilitation in ambulatory care for patients with persisting symptoms after COVID-19: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Lingering symptoms after acute COVID-19 present a major challenge to ambulatory care services. Since there are reservations regarding their optimal management, we aimed to collate all available evidence on the effects of rehabilitation treatments applicable in ambulatory care for these p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dillen, Hannelore, Bekkering, Geertruida, Gijsbers, Sofie, Vande Weygaerde, Yannick, Van Herck, Maarten, Haesevoets, Sarah, Bos, David A G, Li, Ann, Janssens, Wim, Gosselink, Rik, Troosters, Thierry, Verbakel, Jan Y
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10283248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08374-x
_version_ 1785061270286761984
author Dillen, Hannelore
Bekkering, Geertruida
Gijsbers, Sofie
Vande Weygaerde, Yannick
Van Herck, Maarten
Haesevoets, Sarah
Bos, David A G
Li, Ann
Janssens, Wim
Gosselink, Rik
Troosters, Thierry
Verbakel, Jan Y
author_facet Dillen, Hannelore
Bekkering, Geertruida
Gijsbers, Sofie
Vande Weygaerde, Yannick
Van Herck, Maarten
Haesevoets, Sarah
Bos, David A G
Li, Ann
Janssens, Wim
Gosselink, Rik
Troosters, Thierry
Verbakel, Jan Y
author_sort Dillen, Hannelore
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lingering symptoms after acute COVID-19 present a major challenge to ambulatory care services. Since there are reservations regarding their optimal management, we aimed to collate all available evidence on the effects of rehabilitation treatments applicable in ambulatory care for these patients. METHODS: On 9 May 2022, we systematically searched articles in COVID-19 collections, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycArticles, PEDro, and EuropePMC. References were eligible if they reported on the clinical effectiveness of a rehabilitation therapy applicable in ambulatory care for adult patients with persisting symptoms continuing 4 weeks after the onset of COVID-19. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the CASP cohort study checklist and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Summary of Findings tables were constructed and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework. RESULTS: We included 38 studies comprising 2,790 participants. Physical training and breathing exercises may reduce fatigue, dyspnoea, and chest pain and may improve physical capacity and quality of life, but the evidence is very weak (based on 6 RCTs and 12 cohort studies). The evidence underpinning the effect of nutritional supplements on fatigue, dyspnoea, muscle pain, sensory function, psychological well-being, quality of life, and functional capacity is very poor (based on 4 RCTs). Also, the evidence-base is very weak about the effect of olfactory training on sensory function and quality of life (based on 4 RCTs and 3 cohort studies). Multidisciplinary treatment may have beneficial effects on fatigue, dyspnoea, physical capacity, pulmonary function, quality of life, return to daily life activities, and functional capacity, but the evidence is very weak (based on 5 cohort studies). The certainty of evidence is very low due to study limitations, inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision. CONCLUSIONS: Physical training, breathing exercises, olfactory training and multidisciplinary treatment can be effective rehabilitation therapies for patients with persisting symptoms after COVID-19, still with high uncertainty regarding these effects. These findings can guide ambulatory care practitioners to treat these patients and should be incorporated in clinical practice guidelines. High-quality studies are needed to confirm our hypotheses and should report on adverse events. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-023-08374-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10283248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102832482023-06-22 Clinical effectiveness of rehabilitation in ambulatory care for patients with persisting symptoms after COVID-19: a systematic review Dillen, Hannelore Bekkering, Geertruida Gijsbers, Sofie Vande Weygaerde, Yannick Van Herck, Maarten Haesevoets, Sarah Bos, David A G Li, Ann Janssens, Wim Gosselink, Rik Troosters, Thierry Verbakel, Jan Y BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Lingering symptoms after acute COVID-19 present a major challenge to ambulatory care services. Since there are reservations regarding their optimal management, we aimed to collate all available evidence on the effects of rehabilitation treatments applicable in ambulatory care for these patients. METHODS: On 9 May 2022, we systematically searched articles in COVID-19 collections, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycArticles, PEDro, and EuropePMC. References were eligible if they reported on the clinical effectiveness of a rehabilitation therapy applicable in ambulatory care for adult patients with persisting symptoms continuing 4 weeks after the onset of COVID-19. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the CASP cohort study checklist and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Summary of Findings tables were constructed and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework. RESULTS: We included 38 studies comprising 2,790 participants. Physical training and breathing exercises may reduce fatigue, dyspnoea, and chest pain and may improve physical capacity and quality of life, but the evidence is very weak (based on 6 RCTs and 12 cohort studies). The evidence underpinning the effect of nutritional supplements on fatigue, dyspnoea, muscle pain, sensory function, psychological well-being, quality of life, and functional capacity is very poor (based on 4 RCTs). Also, the evidence-base is very weak about the effect of olfactory training on sensory function and quality of life (based on 4 RCTs and 3 cohort studies). Multidisciplinary treatment may have beneficial effects on fatigue, dyspnoea, physical capacity, pulmonary function, quality of life, return to daily life activities, and functional capacity, but the evidence is very weak (based on 5 cohort studies). The certainty of evidence is very low due to study limitations, inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision. CONCLUSIONS: Physical training, breathing exercises, olfactory training and multidisciplinary treatment can be effective rehabilitation therapies for patients with persisting symptoms after COVID-19, still with high uncertainty regarding these effects. These findings can guide ambulatory care practitioners to treat these patients and should be incorporated in clinical practice guidelines. High-quality studies are needed to confirm our hypotheses and should report on adverse events. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-023-08374-x. BioMed Central 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10283248/ /pubmed/37344767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08374-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dillen, Hannelore
Bekkering, Geertruida
Gijsbers, Sofie
Vande Weygaerde, Yannick
Van Herck, Maarten
Haesevoets, Sarah
Bos, David A G
Li, Ann
Janssens, Wim
Gosselink, Rik
Troosters, Thierry
Verbakel, Jan Y
Clinical effectiveness of rehabilitation in ambulatory care for patients with persisting symptoms after COVID-19: a systematic review
title Clinical effectiveness of rehabilitation in ambulatory care for patients with persisting symptoms after COVID-19: a systematic review
title_full Clinical effectiveness of rehabilitation in ambulatory care for patients with persisting symptoms after COVID-19: a systematic review
title_fullStr Clinical effectiveness of rehabilitation in ambulatory care for patients with persisting symptoms after COVID-19: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical effectiveness of rehabilitation in ambulatory care for patients with persisting symptoms after COVID-19: a systematic review
title_short Clinical effectiveness of rehabilitation in ambulatory care for patients with persisting symptoms after COVID-19: a systematic review
title_sort clinical effectiveness of rehabilitation in ambulatory care for patients with persisting symptoms after covid-19: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10283248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08374-x
work_keys_str_mv AT dillenhannelore clinicaleffectivenessofrehabilitationinambulatorycareforpatientswithpersistingsymptomsaftercovid19asystematicreview
AT bekkeringgeertruida clinicaleffectivenessofrehabilitationinambulatorycareforpatientswithpersistingsymptomsaftercovid19asystematicreview
AT gijsberssofie clinicaleffectivenessofrehabilitationinambulatorycareforpatientswithpersistingsymptomsaftercovid19asystematicreview
AT vandeweygaerdeyannick clinicaleffectivenessofrehabilitationinambulatorycareforpatientswithpersistingsymptomsaftercovid19asystematicreview
AT vanherckmaarten clinicaleffectivenessofrehabilitationinambulatorycareforpatientswithpersistingsymptomsaftercovid19asystematicreview
AT haesevoetssarah clinicaleffectivenessofrehabilitationinambulatorycareforpatientswithpersistingsymptomsaftercovid19asystematicreview
AT bosdavidag clinicaleffectivenessofrehabilitationinambulatorycareforpatientswithpersistingsymptomsaftercovid19asystematicreview
AT liann clinicaleffectivenessofrehabilitationinambulatorycareforpatientswithpersistingsymptomsaftercovid19asystematicreview
AT janssenswim clinicaleffectivenessofrehabilitationinambulatorycareforpatientswithpersistingsymptomsaftercovid19asystematicreview
AT gosselinkrik clinicaleffectivenessofrehabilitationinambulatorycareforpatientswithpersistingsymptomsaftercovid19asystematicreview
AT troostersthierry clinicaleffectivenessofrehabilitationinambulatorycareforpatientswithpersistingsymptomsaftercovid19asystematicreview
AT verbakeljany clinicaleffectivenessofrehabilitationinambulatorycareforpatientswithpersistingsymptomsaftercovid19asystematicreview