Cargando…

An economic evaluation of two PCR-based respiratory panel assays for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the UK, France and Spain

BACKGROUND: On admission to hospital, patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), undergo extensive diagnostic testing. Two high-throughput laboratory-based PCR panels which return a result in 5.5 hours (h) have been developed to test for pathogens commonly associated with upper (Respiratory 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miners, Lisa, Huntington, Susie, Lee, Nathaniel, Turner, Katy M. E., Adams, Elisabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10283259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02516-2
_version_ 1785061272894570496
author Miners, Lisa
Huntington, Susie
Lee, Nathaniel
Turner, Katy M. E.
Adams, Elisabeth
author_facet Miners, Lisa
Huntington, Susie
Lee, Nathaniel
Turner, Katy M. E.
Adams, Elisabeth
author_sort Miners, Lisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: On admission to hospital, patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), undergo extensive diagnostic testing. Two high-throughput laboratory-based PCR panels which return a result in 5.5 hours (h) have been developed to test for pathogens commonly associated with upper (Respiratory 1 Panel) and lower (Respiratory 3 Panel) respiratory tract infections (GeneFirst, Oxford). These could replace multiple diagnostic tests currently used. METHODS: An online survey, completed by senior clinicians in the UK, France and Spain, was used to collect data on the diagnostic testing of immunocompetent and immunocompromised adults admitted to hospital with CAP, including the cost of diagnostics. Data were used to inform a cost-comparison model. For each country, the average cost of diagnostic testing per patient was calculated separately for immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. The model compared three testing strategies with standard of care (SoC). In the Panel 1 strategy, the Respiratory 1 Panel was used for patients that would otherwise have tests which could be replaced by Respiratory 1 Panel, equivalent strategies for Respiratory 3 Panel and for both panels combined were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 48 surveys were completed (UK = 17; France = 15; Spain = 16). Compared with SoC, the Panel 1 + 3 strategy was most favourable, resulting in cost savings for immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients respectively, of €22.09 (£18.50) and €26.12 (£21.88) in the UK, €99.60 and €108.77 in France and €27.07 and €51.87 in Spain. CONCLUSION: In all three countries, the use of these respiratory panels could reduce the average cost of diagnostics used for patients admitted to hospital with CAP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-023-02516-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10283259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102832592023-06-22 An economic evaluation of two PCR-based respiratory panel assays for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the UK, France and Spain Miners, Lisa Huntington, Susie Lee, Nathaniel Turner, Katy M. E. Adams, Elisabeth BMC Pulm Med Research BACKGROUND: On admission to hospital, patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), undergo extensive diagnostic testing. Two high-throughput laboratory-based PCR panels which return a result in 5.5 hours (h) have been developed to test for pathogens commonly associated with upper (Respiratory 1 Panel) and lower (Respiratory 3 Panel) respiratory tract infections (GeneFirst, Oxford). These could replace multiple diagnostic tests currently used. METHODS: An online survey, completed by senior clinicians in the UK, France and Spain, was used to collect data on the diagnostic testing of immunocompetent and immunocompromised adults admitted to hospital with CAP, including the cost of diagnostics. Data were used to inform a cost-comparison model. For each country, the average cost of diagnostic testing per patient was calculated separately for immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. The model compared three testing strategies with standard of care (SoC). In the Panel 1 strategy, the Respiratory 1 Panel was used for patients that would otherwise have tests which could be replaced by Respiratory 1 Panel, equivalent strategies for Respiratory 3 Panel and for both panels combined were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 48 surveys were completed (UK = 17; France = 15; Spain = 16). Compared with SoC, the Panel 1 + 3 strategy was most favourable, resulting in cost savings for immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients respectively, of €22.09 (£18.50) and €26.12 (£21.88) in the UK, €99.60 and €108.77 in France and €27.07 and €51.87 in Spain. CONCLUSION: In all three countries, the use of these respiratory panels could reduce the average cost of diagnostics used for patients admitted to hospital with CAP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-023-02516-2. BioMed Central 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10283259/ /pubmed/37344852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02516-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Miners, Lisa
Huntington, Susie
Lee, Nathaniel
Turner, Katy M. E.
Adams, Elisabeth
An economic evaluation of two PCR-based respiratory panel assays for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the UK, France and Spain
title An economic evaluation of two PCR-based respiratory panel assays for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the UK, France and Spain
title_full An economic evaluation of two PCR-based respiratory panel assays for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the UK, France and Spain
title_fullStr An economic evaluation of two PCR-based respiratory panel assays for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the UK, France and Spain
title_full_unstemmed An economic evaluation of two PCR-based respiratory panel assays for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the UK, France and Spain
title_short An economic evaluation of two PCR-based respiratory panel assays for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the UK, France and Spain
title_sort economic evaluation of two pcr-based respiratory panel assays for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (cap) in the uk, france and spain
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10283259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02516-2
work_keys_str_mv AT minerslisa aneconomicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain
AT huntingtonsusie aneconomicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain
AT leenathaniel aneconomicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain
AT turnerkatyme aneconomicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain
AT adamselisabeth aneconomicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain
AT minerslisa economicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain
AT huntingtonsusie economicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain
AT leenathaniel economicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain
AT turnerkatyme economicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain
AT adamselisabeth economicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain