Cargando…
An economic evaluation of two PCR-based respiratory panel assays for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the UK, France and Spain
BACKGROUND: On admission to hospital, patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), undergo extensive diagnostic testing. Two high-throughput laboratory-based PCR panels which return a result in 5.5 hours (h) have been developed to test for pathogens commonly associated with upper (Respiratory 1...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10283259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02516-2 |
_version_ | 1785061272894570496 |
---|---|
author | Miners, Lisa Huntington, Susie Lee, Nathaniel Turner, Katy M. E. Adams, Elisabeth |
author_facet | Miners, Lisa Huntington, Susie Lee, Nathaniel Turner, Katy M. E. Adams, Elisabeth |
author_sort | Miners, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: On admission to hospital, patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), undergo extensive diagnostic testing. Two high-throughput laboratory-based PCR panels which return a result in 5.5 hours (h) have been developed to test for pathogens commonly associated with upper (Respiratory 1 Panel) and lower (Respiratory 3 Panel) respiratory tract infections (GeneFirst, Oxford). These could replace multiple diagnostic tests currently used. METHODS: An online survey, completed by senior clinicians in the UK, France and Spain, was used to collect data on the diagnostic testing of immunocompetent and immunocompromised adults admitted to hospital with CAP, including the cost of diagnostics. Data were used to inform a cost-comparison model. For each country, the average cost of diagnostic testing per patient was calculated separately for immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. The model compared three testing strategies with standard of care (SoC). In the Panel 1 strategy, the Respiratory 1 Panel was used for patients that would otherwise have tests which could be replaced by Respiratory 1 Panel, equivalent strategies for Respiratory 3 Panel and for both panels combined were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 48 surveys were completed (UK = 17; France = 15; Spain = 16). Compared with SoC, the Panel 1 + 3 strategy was most favourable, resulting in cost savings for immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients respectively, of €22.09 (£18.50) and €26.12 (£21.88) in the UK, €99.60 and €108.77 in France and €27.07 and €51.87 in Spain. CONCLUSION: In all three countries, the use of these respiratory panels could reduce the average cost of diagnostics used for patients admitted to hospital with CAP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-023-02516-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10283259 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102832592023-06-22 An economic evaluation of two PCR-based respiratory panel assays for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the UK, France and Spain Miners, Lisa Huntington, Susie Lee, Nathaniel Turner, Katy M. E. Adams, Elisabeth BMC Pulm Med Research BACKGROUND: On admission to hospital, patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), undergo extensive diagnostic testing. Two high-throughput laboratory-based PCR panels which return a result in 5.5 hours (h) have been developed to test for pathogens commonly associated with upper (Respiratory 1 Panel) and lower (Respiratory 3 Panel) respiratory tract infections (GeneFirst, Oxford). These could replace multiple diagnostic tests currently used. METHODS: An online survey, completed by senior clinicians in the UK, France and Spain, was used to collect data on the diagnostic testing of immunocompetent and immunocompromised adults admitted to hospital with CAP, including the cost of diagnostics. Data were used to inform a cost-comparison model. For each country, the average cost of diagnostic testing per patient was calculated separately for immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. The model compared three testing strategies with standard of care (SoC). In the Panel 1 strategy, the Respiratory 1 Panel was used for patients that would otherwise have tests which could be replaced by Respiratory 1 Panel, equivalent strategies for Respiratory 3 Panel and for both panels combined were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 48 surveys were completed (UK = 17; France = 15; Spain = 16). Compared with SoC, the Panel 1 + 3 strategy was most favourable, resulting in cost savings for immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients respectively, of €22.09 (£18.50) and €26.12 (£21.88) in the UK, €99.60 and €108.77 in France and €27.07 and €51.87 in Spain. CONCLUSION: In all three countries, the use of these respiratory panels could reduce the average cost of diagnostics used for patients admitted to hospital with CAP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-023-02516-2. BioMed Central 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10283259/ /pubmed/37344852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02516-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Miners, Lisa Huntington, Susie Lee, Nathaniel Turner, Katy M. E. Adams, Elisabeth An economic evaluation of two PCR-based respiratory panel assays for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the UK, France and Spain |
title | An economic evaluation of two PCR-based respiratory panel assays for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the UK, France and Spain |
title_full | An economic evaluation of two PCR-based respiratory panel assays for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the UK, France and Spain |
title_fullStr | An economic evaluation of two PCR-based respiratory panel assays for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the UK, France and Spain |
title_full_unstemmed | An economic evaluation of two PCR-based respiratory panel assays for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the UK, France and Spain |
title_short | An economic evaluation of two PCR-based respiratory panel assays for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the UK, France and Spain |
title_sort | economic evaluation of two pcr-based respiratory panel assays for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (cap) in the uk, france and spain |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10283259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02516-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT minerslisa aneconomicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain AT huntingtonsusie aneconomicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain AT leenathaniel aneconomicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain AT turnerkatyme aneconomicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain AT adamselisabeth aneconomicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain AT minerslisa economicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain AT huntingtonsusie economicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain AT leenathaniel economicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain AT turnerkatyme economicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain AT adamselisabeth economicevaluationoftwopcrbasedrespiratorypanelassaysforpatientsadmittedtohospitalwithcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapintheukfranceandspain |