Cargando…

Politics matters for individual attitudes toward vaccine donation: cross-national evidence from the United States and Taiwan

BACKGROUND: Vaccine equity has been a major concern during the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the principle of vaccine equity, donor countries should apply the criterion of needs to make decisions about vaccine donation instead of considering recipient countries’ economic status. We examine whether...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsiao, Yuan, Lin, Fang-Yu, Sheen, Greg Chih-Hsin, Wang, Ching-Hsing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10283311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37340401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-023-00940-x
_version_ 1785061285511036928
author Hsiao, Yuan
Lin, Fang-Yu
Sheen, Greg Chih-Hsin
Wang, Ching-Hsing
author_facet Hsiao, Yuan
Lin, Fang-Yu
Sheen, Greg Chih-Hsin
Wang, Ching-Hsing
author_sort Hsiao, Yuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vaccine equity has been a major concern during the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the principle of vaccine equity, donor countries should apply the criterion of needs to make decisions about vaccine donation instead of considering recipient countries’ economic status. We examine whether people follow the same criterion or consider other factors to decide which country to donate vaccines and how many vaccines should be delivered. METHODS: We conducted online surveys with the design of conjoint experiment in the United States and Taiwan in 2021. 1,532 American citizens and 1,587 Taiwanese citizens were interviewed. The respondents were broadly quota-matched to their respective demographic proportions on the dimensions of age, gender, and education. We estimated the average marginal component effects (AMCEs) of the conjoint attributes by using the OLS regression models with standard errors clustered at the respondent level. RESULTS: 15,320 and 15,870 decisions on vaccine donation generated by conjoint experiment respectively in the United States and Taiwan were included in the analysis. Both American and Taiwanese people tend to donate vaccines to countries that suffer severe consequences of COVID-19 and democracies compared to authoritarian countries. However, they are less willing to donate vaccines to those with higher levels of capability in response to COVID-19. Taiwanese people tend to donate vaccines to countries having formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan (AMCE 13.4%, 95% CI 11.8%-15.1%). Nonetheless, American people would rather donate vaccines to countries without formal diplomatic relations with the United States (AMCE − 4.0%, 95% CI -5.6%--2.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings reveal that politics plays a significant role in people’s decisions about vaccine donation. Under electoral pressure, political leaders must think about how to respond to the public’s preferences over vaccine donation to achieve vaccine equity and address the global health crisis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12992-023-00940-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10283311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102833112023-06-22 Politics matters for individual attitudes toward vaccine donation: cross-national evidence from the United States and Taiwan Hsiao, Yuan Lin, Fang-Yu Sheen, Greg Chih-Hsin Wang, Ching-Hsing Global Health Research BACKGROUND: Vaccine equity has been a major concern during the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the principle of vaccine equity, donor countries should apply the criterion of needs to make decisions about vaccine donation instead of considering recipient countries’ economic status. We examine whether people follow the same criterion or consider other factors to decide which country to donate vaccines and how many vaccines should be delivered. METHODS: We conducted online surveys with the design of conjoint experiment in the United States and Taiwan in 2021. 1,532 American citizens and 1,587 Taiwanese citizens were interviewed. The respondents were broadly quota-matched to their respective demographic proportions on the dimensions of age, gender, and education. We estimated the average marginal component effects (AMCEs) of the conjoint attributes by using the OLS regression models with standard errors clustered at the respondent level. RESULTS: 15,320 and 15,870 decisions on vaccine donation generated by conjoint experiment respectively in the United States and Taiwan were included in the analysis. Both American and Taiwanese people tend to donate vaccines to countries that suffer severe consequences of COVID-19 and democracies compared to authoritarian countries. However, they are less willing to donate vaccines to those with higher levels of capability in response to COVID-19. Taiwanese people tend to donate vaccines to countries having formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan (AMCE 13.4%, 95% CI 11.8%-15.1%). Nonetheless, American people would rather donate vaccines to countries without formal diplomatic relations with the United States (AMCE − 4.0%, 95% CI -5.6%--2.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings reveal that politics plays a significant role in people’s decisions about vaccine donation. Under electoral pressure, political leaders must think about how to respond to the public’s preferences over vaccine donation to achieve vaccine equity and address the global health crisis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12992-023-00940-x. BioMed Central 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10283311/ /pubmed/37340401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-023-00940-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hsiao, Yuan
Lin, Fang-Yu
Sheen, Greg Chih-Hsin
Wang, Ching-Hsing
Politics matters for individual attitudes toward vaccine donation: cross-national evidence from the United States and Taiwan
title Politics matters for individual attitudes toward vaccine donation: cross-national evidence from the United States and Taiwan
title_full Politics matters for individual attitudes toward vaccine donation: cross-national evidence from the United States and Taiwan
title_fullStr Politics matters for individual attitudes toward vaccine donation: cross-national evidence from the United States and Taiwan
title_full_unstemmed Politics matters for individual attitudes toward vaccine donation: cross-national evidence from the United States and Taiwan
title_short Politics matters for individual attitudes toward vaccine donation: cross-national evidence from the United States and Taiwan
title_sort politics matters for individual attitudes toward vaccine donation: cross-national evidence from the united states and taiwan
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10283311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37340401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-023-00940-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hsiaoyuan politicsmattersforindividualattitudestowardvaccinedonationcrossnationalevidencefromtheunitedstatesandtaiwan
AT linfangyu politicsmattersforindividualattitudestowardvaccinedonationcrossnationalevidencefromtheunitedstatesandtaiwan
AT sheengregchihhsin politicsmattersforindividualattitudestowardvaccinedonationcrossnationalevidencefromtheunitedstatesandtaiwan
AT wangchinghsing politicsmattersforindividualattitudestowardvaccinedonationcrossnationalevidencefromtheunitedstatesandtaiwan