Cargando…
Bond strength of two universal adhesive systems to human dentin using different strategies
The objective of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentin of two universal adhesive systems: Single Bond Universal (SBU) and Ambar Universal (AU), used in different adhesion strategies. Materials and Method: Thirty-six human teeth were prepared (n=6) and treated fol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Odontológica
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10283391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36748733 http://dx.doi.org/10.54589/aol.35/3/155 |
_version_ | 1785061303181639680 |
---|---|
author | Dutra, Daniel JB Branco, Natalia TT Alvim, Hugo H Magalhães, Cláudia S Oliveira, Ricardo R Moreira, Allyson N |
author_facet | Dutra, Daniel JB Branco, Natalia TT Alvim, Hugo H Magalhães, Cláudia S Oliveira, Ricardo R Moreira, Allyson N |
author_sort | Dutra, Daniel JB |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentin of two universal adhesive systems: Single Bond Universal (SBU) and Ambar Universal (AU), used in different adhesion strategies. Materials and Method: Thirty-six human teeth were prepared (n=6) and treated following different adhesive strategies: G1: SBU-etch-and-rinse, applied on dry dentin; G2: SBUetch- and-rinse, applied on moist dentin; G3: SBU-self-etching; G4: AU-etch-and-rinse, applied on dry dentin; G5: AU-etch-and-rinse, applied on moist dentin; G6: AU-self-etching. The specimens were submitted to μTBS test, failure analysis, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey’s tests (p<0.05). Results: Microtensile bond strength was significantly lower in G1 than G2 and G3. AU adhesive performed worse than the SBU system, except in G5. Cohesive and mixed failures predominated in G1 and G2, while adhesive failures predominated in G3 and G5. Conclusions: Universal adhesives are an interesting innovation, but there are still doubts about their performance, mainly regarding the different protocols provided by the manufacturers. The conventional adhesive strategy on moist dentin demonstrated higher μTBS for both adhesives. The use of the selfetching strategy with the SBU showed promising results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10283391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Odontológica |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102833912023-06-21 Bond strength of two universal adhesive systems to human dentin using different strategies Dutra, Daniel JB Branco, Natalia TT Alvim, Hugo H Magalhães, Cláudia S Oliveira, Ricardo R Moreira, Allyson N Acta Odontol Latinoam Original Article The objective of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentin of two universal adhesive systems: Single Bond Universal (SBU) and Ambar Universal (AU), used in different adhesion strategies. Materials and Method: Thirty-six human teeth were prepared (n=6) and treated following different adhesive strategies: G1: SBU-etch-and-rinse, applied on dry dentin; G2: SBUetch- and-rinse, applied on moist dentin; G3: SBU-self-etching; G4: AU-etch-and-rinse, applied on dry dentin; G5: AU-etch-and-rinse, applied on moist dentin; G6: AU-self-etching. The specimens were submitted to μTBS test, failure analysis, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey’s tests (p<0.05). Results: Microtensile bond strength was significantly lower in G1 than G2 and G3. AU adhesive performed worse than the SBU system, except in G5. Cohesive and mixed failures predominated in G1 and G2, while adhesive failures predominated in G3 and G5. Conclusions: Universal adhesives are an interesting innovation, but there are still doubts about their performance, mainly regarding the different protocols provided by the manufacturers. The conventional adhesive strategy on moist dentin demonstrated higher μTBS for both adhesives. The use of the selfetching strategy with the SBU showed promising results. Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Odontológica 2022-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10283391/ /pubmed/36748733 http://dx.doi.org/10.54589/aol.35/3/155 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dutra, Daniel JB Branco, Natalia TT Alvim, Hugo H Magalhães, Cláudia S Oliveira, Ricardo R Moreira, Allyson N Bond strength of two universal adhesive systems to human dentin using different strategies |
title | Bond strength of two universal adhesive systems to human dentin using different strategies |
title_full | Bond strength of two universal adhesive systems to human dentin using different strategies |
title_fullStr | Bond strength of two universal adhesive systems to human dentin using different strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | Bond strength of two universal adhesive systems to human dentin using different strategies |
title_short | Bond strength of two universal adhesive systems to human dentin using different strategies |
title_sort | bond strength of two universal adhesive systems to human dentin using different strategies |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10283391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36748733 http://dx.doi.org/10.54589/aol.35/3/155 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dutradanieljb bondstrengthoftwouniversaladhesivesystemstohumandentinusingdifferentstrategies AT branconataliatt bondstrengthoftwouniversaladhesivesystemstohumandentinusingdifferentstrategies AT alvimhugoh bondstrengthoftwouniversaladhesivesystemstohumandentinusingdifferentstrategies AT magalhaesclaudias bondstrengthoftwouniversaladhesivesystemstohumandentinusingdifferentstrategies AT oliveiraricardor bondstrengthoftwouniversaladhesivesystemstohumandentinusingdifferentstrategies AT moreiraallysonn bondstrengthoftwouniversaladhesivesystemstohumandentinusingdifferentstrategies |