Cargando…
Comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with deproteinized bovine bone and native bone. A preclinical study
The aim of this study was to evaluate the osseointegration of implants placed in rat tibia sites grafted with Deproteinized Bovine Bone (DBB) and Native Bone (NB). Twenty-eight rats were divided into two groups according to the type of substrate in which the implants were to be placed: NB – implants...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Odontológica
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10283429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35700535 http://dx.doi.org/10.54589/aol.35/1/3 |
_version_ | 1785061308527280128 |
---|---|
author | Quiroz, Victor F Lima, Júlia R Pinotti, Felipe E Marcantonio, Rosemary AC Marcantonio, Elcio Oliveira, Guilherme JPL |
author_facet | Quiroz, Victor F Lima, Júlia R Pinotti, Felipe E Marcantonio, Rosemary AC Marcantonio, Elcio Oliveira, Guilherme JPL |
author_sort | Quiroz, Victor F |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to evaluate the osseointegration of implants placed in rat tibia sites grafted with Deproteinized Bovine Bone (DBB) and Native Bone (NB). Twenty-eight rats were divided into two groups according to the type of substrate in which the implants were to be placed: NB – implants placed in native bone; DBB – implants placed in areas grafted with DBB. In the DBB group, the bone defect was made and filled with the bone substitute 60 days before placing the implant. The animals were euthanized 15 or 45 days after implant placement. Osseointegration was assessed by the removal torque, volume of mineralized tissues around the implants (BV/TV), bone-implant contact (%BIC), and bone between threads (%BBT). The implants placed in NB presented higher removal torque (8.00 ± 1.26 Ncm vs. 2.33 ± 0.41 Ncm at 15 days and 22.00 ± 2.44 Ncm vs. 4.00 ± 1.41 Ncm at 45 days), higher %BV/TV (47.92 ± 1.54% vs. 33.33 ± 4.77% at 15 days and 70.06 ± 0.91% vs. 39.89 ± 5.90% at 45 days), higher %BIC (39.68 ± 5.02% vs. 9.12 ± 5.56% at 15 days and 83.23 ± 4.42% vs. 18.81 ± 7.21% at 45 days), and higher %BBT (34.33 ± 5.42% vs. 13.24 ± 8.72% at 15 days and 82.33 ± 3.13% vs. 22.26 ± 8.27% at 45 days) than the implants placed in DBB grafted areas. The degree of osseointegration was lower in implants placed in the area grafted with DBB than in NB in rat tibias. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10283429 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Odontológica |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102834292023-06-21 Comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with deproteinized bovine bone and native bone. A preclinical study Quiroz, Victor F Lima, Júlia R Pinotti, Felipe E Marcantonio, Rosemary AC Marcantonio, Elcio Oliveira, Guilherme JPL Acta Odontol Latinoam Original Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the osseointegration of implants placed in rat tibia sites grafted with Deproteinized Bovine Bone (DBB) and Native Bone (NB). Twenty-eight rats were divided into two groups according to the type of substrate in which the implants were to be placed: NB – implants placed in native bone; DBB – implants placed in areas grafted with DBB. In the DBB group, the bone defect was made and filled with the bone substitute 60 days before placing the implant. The animals were euthanized 15 or 45 days after implant placement. Osseointegration was assessed by the removal torque, volume of mineralized tissues around the implants (BV/TV), bone-implant contact (%BIC), and bone between threads (%BBT). The implants placed in NB presented higher removal torque (8.00 ± 1.26 Ncm vs. 2.33 ± 0.41 Ncm at 15 days and 22.00 ± 2.44 Ncm vs. 4.00 ± 1.41 Ncm at 45 days), higher %BV/TV (47.92 ± 1.54% vs. 33.33 ± 4.77% at 15 days and 70.06 ± 0.91% vs. 39.89 ± 5.90% at 45 days), higher %BIC (39.68 ± 5.02% vs. 9.12 ± 5.56% at 15 days and 83.23 ± 4.42% vs. 18.81 ± 7.21% at 45 days), and higher %BBT (34.33 ± 5.42% vs. 13.24 ± 8.72% at 15 days and 82.33 ± 3.13% vs. 22.26 ± 8.27% at 45 days) than the implants placed in DBB grafted areas. The degree of osseointegration was lower in implants placed in the area grafted with DBB than in NB in rat tibias. Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Odontológica 2022-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10283429/ /pubmed/35700535 http://dx.doi.org/10.54589/aol.35/1/3 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Original Article Quiroz, Victor F Lima, Júlia R Pinotti, Felipe E Marcantonio, Rosemary AC Marcantonio, Elcio Oliveira, Guilherme JPL Comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with deproteinized bovine bone and native bone. A preclinical study |
title | Comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with deproteinized bovine bone and native bone. A preclinical study |
title_full | Comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with deproteinized bovine bone and native bone. A preclinical study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with deproteinized bovine bone and native bone. A preclinical study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with deproteinized bovine bone and native bone. A preclinical study |
title_short | Comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with deproteinized bovine bone and native bone. A preclinical study |
title_sort | comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with deproteinized bovine bone and native bone. a preclinical study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10283429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35700535 http://dx.doi.org/10.54589/aol.35/1/3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quirozvictorf comparisonofosseointegrationinareasgraftedwithdeproteinizedbovineboneandnativeboneapreclinicalstudy AT limajuliar comparisonofosseointegrationinareasgraftedwithdeproteinizedbovineboneandnativeboneapreclinicalstudy AT pinottifelipee comparisonofosseointegrationinareasgraftedwithdeproteinizedbovineboneandnativeboneapreclinicalstudy AT marcantoniorosemaryac comparisonofosseointegrationinareasgraftedwithdeproteinizedbovineboneandnativeboneapreclinicalstudy AT marcantonioelcio comparisonofosseointegrationinareasgraftedwithdeproteinizedbovineboneandnativeboneapreclinicalstudy AT oliveiraguilhermejpl comparisonofosseointegrationinareasgraftedwithdeproteinizedbovineboneandnativeboneapreclinicalstudy |