Cargando…

Development and Validation of the Missed Nursing Care Tool for Pre-Operative Patients with Lung Cancer in China

INTRODUCTION: Current research suggests that missed nursing care is widespread in preoperative lung cancer patients in China, and preoperative airway management nursing care for lung cancer patients is not standardized. Missed nursing care for preoperative lung cancer patients, on the other hand, is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Xin-ping, Dychangco, Ma Encarnacion A, Yang, Xu-ming, Olivar, Jennifer Joy R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37350778
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S413585
_version_ 1785061345786331136
author Shi, Xin-ping
Dychangco, Ma Encarnacion A
Yang, Xu-ming
Olivar, Jennifer Joy R
author_facet Shi, Xin-ping
Dychangco, Ma Encarnacion A
Yang, Xu-ming
Olivar, Jennifer Joy R
author_sort Shi, Xin-ping
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Current research suggests that missed nursing care is widespread in preoperative lung cancer patients in China, and preoperative airway management nursing care for lung cancer patients is not standardized. Missed nursing care for preoperative lung cancer patients, on the other hand, is rarely investigated, particularly from the patient’s perspective. This study aimed to develop and validate the MISSCARE Survey for pre-operative patients with lung cancer in China. METHODS: This study generated the preliminary draft of the MISSCARE Survey - Lung Cancer Patient (MS-LCP) and tested its reliability and stability through three rounds of lung cancer resection (494, 50, and 309 cases, respectively). 20 patients and 6 experts determined the face and content validity. EFA and CFA assessed construct and convergent validity. Internal consistency, including Cronbach’s alpha, Spearman-Brown reliability, and re-test reliability, was also examined. RESULTS: The scale contained 15 items, including specific care, communicative care, timely care, and basic care. KMO was 0.932 (> 0.6), and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity showed P = 0.000 (<0.05). The attribution factor’s item loads ranged from 0.765 to 0.853, accounting for 82.20% of the variation. The scale’s Cronbach’s alpha, Spearman-Brown, and retest reliability were 0.945, 0.879, and 0.824. CFA showed goodness of fit (RMSEA = 0.021, χ(2)/df = 1.138, GFI = 0.900, AGFI = 0.945, CFI = 0.996, NFI = 0.967, IFI = 0.996). For each dimension, AVE ranged from 0.555 to 0.717 (>0.50) and CR from 0.861 to 0.904 (>0.70). CONCLUSION: The MS-LCP was reliable and valid in this study, making it appropriate for the Chinese lung cancer patient population. This tool is more objective in its presentation of missed nursing care, assisting nursing staff in optimizing nursing procedures before surgery, increasing the implementation of higher-quality tumor care, and promoting the recovery of lung cancer surgery patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10284153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102841532023-06-22 Development and Validation of the Missed Nursing Care Tool for Pre-Operative Patients with Lung Cancer in China Shi, Xin-ping Dychangco, Ma Encarnacion A Yang, Xu-ming Olivar, Jennifer Joy R Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research INTRODUCTION: Current research suggests that missed nursing care is widespread in preoperative lung cancer patients in China, and preoperative airway management nursing care for lung cancer patients is not standardized. Missed nursing care for preoperative lung cancer patients, on the other hand, is rarely investigated, particularly from the patient’s perspective. This study aimed to develop and validate the MISSCARE Survey for pre-operative patients with lung cancer in China. METHODS: This study generated the preliminary draft of the MISSCARE Survey - Lung Cancer Patient (MS-LCP) and tested its reliability and stability through three rounds of lung cancer resection (494, 50, and 309 cases, respectively). 20 patients and 6 experts determined the face and content validity. EFA and CFA assessed construct and convergent validity. Internal consistency, including Cronbach’s alpha, Spearman-Brown reliability, and re-test reliability, was also examined. RESULTS: The scale contained 15 items, including specific care, communicative care, timely care, and basic care. KMO was 0.932 (> 0.6), and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity showed P = 0.000 (<0.05). The attribution factor’s item loads ranged from 0.765 to 0.853, accounting for 82.20% of the variation. The scale’s Cronbach’s alpha, Spearman-Brown, and retest reliability were 0.945, 0.879, and 0.824. CFA showed goodness of fit (RMSEA = 0.021, χ(2)/df = 1.138, GFI = 0.900, AGFI = 0.945, CFI = 0.996, NFI = 0.967, IFI = 0.996). For each dimension, AVE ranged from 0.555 to 0.717 (>0.50) and CR from 0.861 to 0.904 (>0.70). CONCLUSION: The MS-LCP was reliable and valid in this study, making it appropriate for the Chinese lung cancer patient population. This tool is more objective in its presentation of missed nursing care, assisting nursing staff in optimizing nursing procedures before surgery, increasing the implementation of higher-quality tumor care, and promoting the recovery of lung cancer surgery patients. Dove 2023-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10284153/ /pubmed/37350778 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S413585 Text en © 2023 Shi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Shi, Xin-ping
Dychangco, Ma Encarnacion A
Yang, Xu-ming
Olivar, Jennifer Joy R
Development and Validation of the Missed Nursing Care Tool for Pre-Operative Patients with Lung Cancer in China
title Development and Validation of the Missed Nursing Care Tool for Pre-Operative Patients with Lung Cancer in China
title_full Development and Validation of the Missed Nursing Care Tool for Pre-Operative Patients with Lung Cancer in China
title_fullStr Development and Validation of the Missed Nursing Care Tool for Pre-Operative Patients with Lung Cancer in China
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of the Missed Nursing Care Tool for Pre-Operative Patients with Lung Cancer in China
title_short Development and Validation of the Missed Nursing Care Tool for Pre-Operative Patients with Lung Cancer in China
title_sort development and validation of the missed nursing care tool for pre-operative patients with lung cancer in china
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37350778
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S413585
work_keys_str_mv AT shixinping developmentandvalidationofthemissednursingcaretoolforpreoperativepatientswithlungcancerinchina
AT dychangcomaencarnaciona developmentandvalidationofthemissednursingcaretoolforpreoperativepatientswithlungcancerinchina
AT yangxuming developmentandvalidationofthemissednursingcaretoolforpreoperativepatientswithlungcancerinchina
AT olivarjenniferjoyr developmentandvalidationofthemissednursingcaretoolforpreoperativepatientswithlungcancerinchina