Cargando…

Value of Dynamic (18)F-FDG PET/CT in Predicting the Success of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study

OBJECTIVES: This prospective study was planned to compare the predictive value of dynamic (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in locally advanced breast cancer patients (LABC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS: Twenty seven patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kupik, Osman, Tuncel, Murat, Özgen Kıratlı, Pınar, Akpınar, Meltem Gülsün, Altundağ, Kadri, Başaran Demirkazık, Figen, Erbaş, Belkıs
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337702
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2022.97658
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: This prospective study was planned to compare the predictive value of dynamic (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in locally advanced breast cancer patients (LABC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS: Twenty seven patients with LABC [median age: 47, (26-66)] underwent a dynamic (18)F-FDG PET study at baseline, and after 2-3 cycles of (NAC) were included (interim). Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) values and SUV ratios for the 2(nd), 5(th), 10(th), and 30(th) minutes and dynamic curve slope (SL) values and SL ratios were measured using (18)F-FDG dynamic data. In addition, the values of SUV(mean) (2minSUVmean), SULpeak (2minSULpeak), metabolic volume (2minVol), and total lesion glycolysis (2minTLG) were measured for the first 2 min. Percent changes between baseline and interim studies were calculated and compared with the pathological results as the pathological complete response (PCR) or the pathological non-complete response (non-PCR). Receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained to calculate the area under the curve to predict PCR. Optimal threshold values were calculated to discriminate between PCR and non-PCR groups. RESULTS: Baseline study SUV 30 (p=0.044), SUV 30/2 (p=0.041), SUV 30/5 (p=0.049), SUV 30/10 (p=0.021), SL 30/2 (p=0.029) and SL 30/5 (p=0.027) values were statistically significant different between PCR and non-PCR groups. The percentage changes of 2minVol between PCR and non-PCR groups were statistically significant. For the threshold value of -67.6% change in 2minVol, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 87.2%, 77.8%, 63.6%, 93.3%, and 80.7%, respectively (area under the curve: 0.826, p=0.009). CONCLUSION: Semiquantitative parameters for dynamic (18)F-FDG PET can predict PCR. % changes in 2minVol can identify non-responding patients better than other parameters.