Cargando…
Cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, and the effectiveness of activity monitoring devices on cardiovascular patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews
AIMS: To consolidate the evidence on the effectiveness of activity-monitoring devices and mobile applications on physical activity and health outcomes of patients with cardiovascular disease who attended cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes. METHODS AND RESULTS: An umbrella review of published ran...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36690341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad005 |
_version_ | 1785061369987465216 |
---|---|
author | Dafny, Hila Ariela Champion, Stephanie Gebremichael, Lemlem G Pearson, Vincent Hendriks, Jeroen M Clark, Robyn A Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra Gulyani, Aarti Hines, Sonia Beleigoli, Alline |
author_facet | Dafny, Hila Ariela Champion, Stephanie Gebremichael, Lemlem G Pearson, Vincent Hendriks, Jeroen M Clark, Robyn A Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra Gulyani, Aarti Hines, Sonia Beleigoli, Alline |
author_sort | Dafny, Hila Ariela |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To consolidate the evidence on the effectiveness of activity-monitoring devices and mobile applications on physical activity and health outcomes of patients with cardiovascular disease who attended cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes. METHODS AND RESULTS: An umbrella review of published randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses was conducted. Nine databases were searched from inception to 9 February 2022. Search and data extraction followed the JBI methodology for umbrella reviews and PRISMA guidelines. Nine systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria, comparing outcomes of participants in CR programmes utilizing devices/applications, to patients without access to CR with devices/applications. A wide range of physical, clinical, and behavioural outcomes were reported, with results from 18 712 participants. Meta-analyses reported improvements in physical activity, minutes/week [standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10–0.35] and activity levels (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.07–0.51), and a reduction in sedentariness [risk ratio (RR) 0.54, 95% CI 0.39–0.75] in CR participants, compared with usual care. Of clinical outcomes, the risk of re-hospitalization reduced significantly (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27–0.89), and there was reduction (non-significant) in mortality (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.05–1.54). From the behavioural outcomes, reviews reported improvements in smoking behaviour (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.67–1.13) and total diet quality intake (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66–0.94) among CR patients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of devices/applications was associated with increase in activity, healthy behaviours, and reductions in clinical indicators. Although most effect sizes indicate limited clinical benefits, the broad consistency of the narrative suggests devices/applications are effective at improving CR patients’ outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10284262 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102842622023-06-22 Cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, and the effectiveness of activity monitoring devices on cardiovascular patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews Dafny, Hila Ariela Champion, Stephanie Gebremichael, Lemlem G Pearson, Vincent Hendriks, Jeroen M Clark, Robyn A Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra Gulyani, Aarti Hines, Sonia Beleigoli, Alline Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes Review AIMS: To consolidate the evidence on the effectiveness of activity-monitoring devices and mobile applications on physical activity and health outcomes of patients with cardiovascular disease who attended cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes. METHODS AND RESULTS: An umbrella review of published randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses was conducted. Nine databases were searched from inception to 9 February 2022. Search and data extraction followed the JBI methodology for umbrella reviews and PRISMA guidelines. Nine systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria, comparing outcomes of participants in CR programmes utilizing devices/applications, to patients without access to CR with devices/applications. A wide range of physical, clinical, and behavioural outcomes were reported, with results from 18 712 participants. Meta-analyses reported improvements in physical activity, minutes/week [standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10–0.35] and activity levels (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.07–0.51), and a reduction in sedentariness [risk ratio (RR) 0.54, 95% CI 0.39–0.75] in CR participants, compared with usual care. Of clinical outcomes, the risk of re-hospitalization reduced significantly (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27–0.89), and there was reduction (non-significant) in mortality (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.05–1.54). From the behavioural outcomes, reviews reported improvements in smoking behaviour (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.67–1.13) and total diet quality intake (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66–0.94) among CR patients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of devices/applications was associated with increase in activity, healthy behaviours, and reductions in clinical indicators. Although most effect sizes indicate limited clinical benefits, the broad consistency of the narrative suggests devices/applications are effective at improving CR patients’ outcomes. Oxford University Press 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10284262/ /pubmed/36690341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad005 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Dafny, Hila Ariela Champion, Stephanie Gebremichael, Lemlem G Pearson, Vincent Hendriks, Jeroen M Clark, Robyn A Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra Gulyani, Aarti Hines, Sonia Beleigoli, Alline Cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, and the effectiveness of activity monitoring devices on cardiovascular patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews |
title | Cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, and the effectiveness of activity monitoring devices on cardiovascular patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews |
title_full | Cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, and the effectiveness of activity monitoring devices on cardiovascular patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews |
title_fullStr | Cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, and the effectiveness of activity monitoring devices on cardiovascular patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, and the effectiveness of activity monitoring devices on cardiovascular patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews |
title_short | Cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, and the effectiveness of activity monitoring devices on cardiovascular patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews |
title_sort | cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, and the effectiveness of activity monitoring devices on cardiovascular patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36690341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dafnyhilaariela cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews AT championstephanie cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews AT gebremichaellemlemg cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews AT pearsonvincent cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews AT hendriksjeroenm cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews AT clarkrobyna cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews AT pinerodeplazamariaalejandra cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews AT gulyaniaarti cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews AT hinessonia cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews AT beleigolialline cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews |