Cargando…

Cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, and the effectiveness of activity monitoring devices on cardiovascular patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews

AIMS: To consolidate the evidence on the effectiveness of activity-monitoring devices and mobile applications on physical activity and health outcomes of patients with cardiovascular disease who attended cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes. METHODS AND RESULTS: An umbrella review of published ran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dafny, Hila Ariela, Champion, Stephanie, Gebremichael, Lemlem G, Pearson, Vincent, Hendriks, Jeroen M, Clark, Robyn A, Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra, Gulyani, Aarti, Hines, Sonia, Beleigoli, Alline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36690341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad005
_version_ 1785061369987465216
author Dafny, Hila Ariela
Champion, Stephanie
Gebremichael, Lemlem G
Pearson, Vincent
Hendriks, Jeroen M
Clark, Robyn A
Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra
Gulyani, Aarti
Hines, Sonia
Beleigoli, Alline
author_facet Dafny, Hila Ariela
Champion, Stephanie
Gebremichael, Lemlem G
Pearson, Vincent
Hendriks, Jeroen M
Clark, Robyn A
Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra
Gulyani, Aarti
Hines, Sonia
Beleigoli, Alline
author_sort Dafny, Hila Ariela
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To consolidate the evidence on the effectiveness of activity-monitoring devices and mobile applications on physical activity and health outcomes of patients with cardiovascular disease who attended cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes. METHODS AND RESULTS: An umbrella review of published randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses was conducted. Nine databases were searched from inception to 9 February 2022. Search and data extraction followed the JBI methodology for umbrella reviews and PRISMA guidelines. Nine systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria, comparing outcomes of participants in CR programmes utilizing devices/applications, to patients without access to CR with devices/applications. A wide range of physical, clinical, and behavioural outcomes were reported, with results from 18 712 participants. Meta-analyses reported improvements in physical activity, minutes/week [standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10–0.35] and activity levels (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.07–0.51), and a reduction in sedentariness [risk ratio (RR) 0.54, 95% CI 0.39–0.75] in CR participants, compared with usual care. Of clinical outcomes, the risk of re-hospitalization reduced significantly (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27–0.89), and there was reduction (non-significant) in mortality (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.05–1.54). From the behavioural outcomes, reviews reported improvements in smoking behaviour (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.67–1.13) and total diet quality intake (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66–0.94) among CR patients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of devices/applications was associated with increase in activity, healthy behaviours, and reductions in clinical indicators. Although most effect sizes indicate limited clinical benefits, the broad consistency of the narrative suggests devices/applications are effective at improving CR patients’ outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10284262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102842622023-06-22 Cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, and the effectiveness of activity monitoring devices on cardiovascular patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews Dafny, Hila Ariela Champion, Stephanie Gebremichael, Lemlem G Pearson, Vincent Hendriks, Jeroen M Clark, Robyn A Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra Gulyani, Aarti Hines, Sonia Beleigoli, Alline Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes Review AIMS: To consolidate the evidence on the effectiveness of activity-monitoring devices and mobile applications on physical activity and health outcomes of patients with cardiovascular disease who attended cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes. METHODS AND RESULTS: An umbrella review of published randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses was conducted. Nine databases were searched from inception to 9 February 2022. Search and data extraction followed the JBI methodology for umbrella reviews and PRISMA guidelines. Nine systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria, comparing outcomes of participants in CR programmes utilizing devices/applications, to patients without access to CR with devices/applications. A wide range of physical, clinical, and behavioural outcomes were reported, with results from 18 712 participants. Meta-analyses reported improvements in physical activity, minutes/week [standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10–0.35] and activity levels (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.07–0.51), and a reduction in sedentariness [risk ratio (RR) 0.54, 95% CI 0.39–0.75] in CR participants, compared with usual care. Of clinical outcomes, the risk of re-hospitalization reduced significantly (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27–0.89), and there was reduction (non-significant) in mortality (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.05–1.54). From the behavioural outcomes, reviews reported improvements in smoking behaviour (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.67–1.13) and total diet quality intake (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66–0.94) among CR patients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of devices/applications was associated with increase in activity, healthy behaviours, and reductions in clinical indicators. Although most effect sizes indicate limited clinical benefits, the broad consistency of the narrative suggests devices/applications are effective at improving CR patients’ outcomes. Oxford University Press 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10284262/ /pubmed/36690341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad005 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Dafny, Hila Ariela
Champion, Stephanie
Gebremichael, Lemlem G
Pearson, Vincent
Hendriks, Jeroen M
Clark, Robyn A
Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra
Gulyani, Aarti
Hines, Sonia
Beleigoli, Alline
Cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, and the effectiveness of activity monitoring devices on cardiovascular patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews
title Cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, and the effectiveness of activity monitoring devices on cardiovascular patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews
title_full Cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, and the effectiveness of activity monitoring devices on cardiovascular patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews
title_fullStr Cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, and the effectiveness of activity monitoring devices on cardiovascular patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, and the effectiveness of activity monitoring devices on cardiovascular patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews
title_short Cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, and the effectiveness of activity monitoring devices on cardiovascular patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews
title_sort cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, and the effectiveness of activity monitoring devices on cardiovascular patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36690341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad005
work_keys_str_mv AT dafnyhilaariela cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews
AT championstephanie cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews
AT gebremichaellemlemg cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews
AT pearsonvincent cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews
AT hendriksjeroenm cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews
AT clarkrobyna cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews
AT pinerodeplazamariaalejandra cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews
AT gulyaniaarti cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews
AT hinessonia cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews
AT beleigolialline cardiacrehabilitationphysicalactivityandtheeffectivenessofactivitymonitoringdevicesoncardiovascularpatientsanumbrellareviewofsystematicreviews