Cargando…

Comparison of intranasal midazolam-fentanyl with dexmedetomidine–fentanyl as pre-medication in the paediatric age group

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Intranasal midazolam-fentanyl is commonly used as pre-medication in paediatric patients, but there is a risk of respiratory depression with this combination. Dexmedetomidine is a drug that preserves respiratory function. The objective of this study was to compare the eff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaur, Tripat, Kumar, Parmod, Kundra, Tanveer Singh, Kaur, Ikjot
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37040227
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_759_20
_version_ 1785061386446962688
author Kaur, Tripat
Kumar, Parmod
Kundra, Tanveer Singh
Kaur, Ikjot
author_facet Kaur, Tripat
Kumar, Parmod
Kundra, Tanveer Singh
Kaur, Ikjot
author_sort Kaur, Tripat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Intranasal midazolam-fentanyl is commonly used as pre-medication in paediatric patients, but there is a risk of respiratory depression with this combination. Dexmedetomidine is a drug that preserves respiratory function. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of intranasal midazolam-fentanyl and dexmedetomidine-fentanyl in paediatric patients undergoing elective surgeries. METHODS: Hundred children in the age group of 3-8 yr of American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status grade 1 were randomized into two groups- group A received intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/kg)-fentanyl (2 µg/kg) and group B received intranasal dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg)-fentanyl (2 µg/kg) 20 min before induction of general anaesthesia. Heart rate and SpO(2) were monitored. Sedation score, parental separation and response to intravenous cannulation were seen after 20 min. Children were monitored for 2 h for post-operative analgesia by Oucher’s Facial Pain Scale. RESULTS: Sedation scores were satisfactory in both groups, although children in group A were more sedated than in group B. Parental separation and response to intravenous cannulation were comparable in both the groups. The two groups were also haemodynamically comparable intraoperatively. Post-operative heart rate was also comparable at all-time intervals in both the groups except for heart rate at 100 and 120 min which were more in group A. Group A experienced more post-operative pain as assessed by Oucher’s Facial Pain Scale as compared to group B. Children receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine-fentanyl had better post-operative analgesia as compared to those who received intranasal midazolam-fentanyl. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Both intranasal midazolam with fentanyl and intranasal dexmedetomidine with fentanyl provided satisfactory sedation. Both groups were comparable in separation reaction and response to intravenous cannulation with better post-operative analgesia in children receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine-fentanyl.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10284369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102843692023-06-22 Comparison of intranasal midazolam-fentanyl with dexmedetomidine–fentanyl as pre-medication in the paediatric age group Kaur, Tripat Kumar, Parmod Kundra, Tanveer Singh Kaur, Ikjot Indian J Med Res Practice: Original Article BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Intranasal midazolam-fentanyl is commonly used as pre-medication in paediatric patients, but there is a risk of respiratory depression with this combination. Dexmedetomidine is a drug that preserves respiratory function. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of intranasal midazolam-fentanyl and dexmedetomidine-fentanyl in paediatric patients undergoing elective surgeries. METHODS: Hundred children in the age group of 3-8 yr of American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status grade 1 were randomized into two groups- group A received intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/kg)-fentanyl (2 µg/kg) and group B received intranasal dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg)-fentanyl (2 µg/kg) 20 min before induction of general anaesthesia. Heart rate and SpO(2) were monitored. Sedation score, parental separation and response to intravenous cannulation were seen after 20 min. Children were monitored for 2 h for post-operative analgesia by Oucher’s Facial Pain Scale. RESULTS: Sedation scores were satisfactory in both groups, although children in group A were more sedated than in group B. Parental separation and response to intravenous cannulation were comparable in both the groups. The two groups were also haemodynamically comparable intraoperatively. Post-operative heart rate was also comparable at all-time intervals in both the groups except for heart rate at 100 and 120 min which were more in group A. Group A experienced more post-operative pain as assessed by Oucher’s Facial Pain Scale as compared to group B. Children receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine-fentanyl had better post-operative analgesia as compared to those who received intranasal midazolam-fentanyl. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Both intranasal midazolam with fentanyl and intranasal dexmedetomidine with fentanyl provided satisfactory sedation. Both groups were comparable in separation reaction and response to intravenous cannulation with better post-operative analgesia in children receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine-fentanyl. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-01 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10284369/ /pubmed/37040227 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_759_20 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Medical Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Practice: Original Article
Kaur, Tripat
Kumar, Parmod
Kundra, Tanveer Singh
Kaur, Ikjot
Comparison of intranasal midazolam-fentanyl with dexmedetomidine–fentanyl as pre-medication in the paediatric age group
title Comparison of intranasal midazolam-fentanyl with dexmedetomidine–fentanyl as pre-medication in the paediatric age group
title_full Comparison of intranasal midazolam-fentanyl with dexmedetomidine–fentanyl as pre-medication in the paediatric age group
title_fullStr Comparison of intranasal midazolam-fentanyl with dexmedetomidine–fentanyl as pre-medication in the paediatric age group
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of intranasal midazolam-fentanyl with dexmedetomidine–fentanyl as pre-medication in the paediatric age group
title_short Comparison of intranasal midazolam-fentanyl with dexmedetomidine–fentanyl as pre-medication in the paediatric age group
title_sort comparison of intranasal midazolam-fentanyl with dexmedetomidine–fentanyl as pre-medication in the paediatric age group
topic Practice: Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37040227
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_759_20
work_keys_str_mv AT kaurtripat comparisonofintranasalmidazolamfentanylwithdexmedetomidinefentanylaspremedicationinthepaediatricagegroup
AT kumarparmod comparisonofintranasalmidazolamfentanylwithdexmedetomidinefentanylaspremedicationinthepaediatricagegroup
AT kundratanveersingh comparisonofintranasalmidazolamfentanylwithdexmedetomidinefentanylaspremedicationinthepaediatricagegroup
AT kaurikjot comparisonofintranasalmidazolamfentanylwithdexmedetomidinefentanylaspremedicationinthepaediatricagegroup