Cargando…

Vaccine Acceptance During a Novel Student-led Emergency Department COVID-19 Vaccination Program

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic not only exacerbated barriers to healthcare but has also highlighted the trend toward increased vaccine hesitancy. Our goal was to improve COVID-19 vaccine uptake through a student-led, emergency department-based (ED) vaccination program. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eastin, Carly, Moore, Brendan, Moulton, Aaron, Lefler, Luke, Haydar, Fuad, Sweere, Morgan, Jones, Gavin, Sparks, Crystal, Porter, Austin, Allison, M. Kathryn, Eastin, Travis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37278772
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.58728
_version_ 1785061418930798592
author Eastin, Carly
Moore, Brendan
Moulton, Aaron
Lefler, Luke
Haydar, Fuad
Sweere, Morgan
Jones, Gavin
Sparks, Crystal
Porter, Austin
Allison, M. Kathryn
Eastin, Travis
author_facet Eastin, Carly
Moore, Brendan
Moulton, Aaron
Lefler, Luke
Haydar, Fuad
Sweere, Morgan
Jones, Gavin
Sparks, Crystal
Porter, Austin
Allison, M. Kathryn
Eastin, Travis
author_sort Eastin, Carly
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic not only exacerbated barriers to healthcare but has also highlighted the trend toward increased vaccine hesitancy. Our goal was to improve COVID-19 vaccine uptake through a student-led, emergency department-based (ED) vaccination program. METHODS: This prospective, quality-improvement pilot program used medical and pharmacy student volunteers as COVID-19 vaccine screeners in a southern, urban, academic ED. Patients eligible for vaccination were offered either the Janssen-Johnson & Johnson or the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine and were educated about vaccine concerns. Vaccine acceptance rates were recorded, as well as reasons for vaccine hesitancy, vaccine brand preferences, and demographics. The primary and secondary quantitative outcomes were overall vaccine acceptance and change in vaccine acceptance after student-provided education, respectively. We performed logistic regression to identify potential variables that correlated with vaccine acceptance. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, focus group interviews with four key stakeholder groups explored implementation facilitators and barriers. RESULTS: We screened 406 patients for COVID-19 vaccination eligibility and current vaccine status, the majority of whom were unvaccinated. Of unvaccinated or partially vaccinated patients, vaccine acceptance before education was 28.3% (81/286), and vaccine acceptance after education was 31.5% (90/286) (% difference, 3.1% [95% CI 0.3%–5.9%], P=0.03). The most common hesitancy factors cited were concerns about side effects and safety. Results from the regression analysis indicated that increasing age and Black race were associated with an increased odds of vaccine acceptance. Focus groups revealed implementation barriers, including patient resistance and workflow issues, and facilitators, including student involvement and public health promotion. CONCLUSION: Using medical and pharmacy student volunteers as COVID-19 vaccine screeners was successful, and brief education provided by the students led to a modest increase in vaccine acceptance, with overall acceptance of 31.5%. Numerous educational benefits are described.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10284509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102845092023-06-22 Vaccine Acceptance During a Novel Student-led Emergency Department COVID-19 Vaccination Program Eastin, Carly Moore, Brendan Moulton, Aaron Lefler, Luke Haydar, Fuad Sweere, Morgan Jones, Gavin Sparks, Crystal Porter, Austin Allison, M. Kathryn Eastin, Travis West J Emerg Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic not only exacerbated barriers to healthcare but has also highlighted the trend toward increased vaccine hesitancy. Our goal was to improve COVID-19 vaccine uptake through a student-led, emergency department-based (ED) vaccination program. METHODS: This prospective, quality-improvement pilot program used medical and pharmacy student volunteers as COVID-19 vaccine screeners in a southern, urban, academic ED. Patients eligible for vaccination were offered either the Janssen-Johnson & Johnson or the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine and were educated about vaccine concerns. Vaccine acceptance rates were recorded, as well as reasons for vaccine hesitancy, vaccine brand preferences, and demographics. The primary and secondary quantitative outcomes were overall vaccine acceptance and change in vaccine acceptance after student-provided education, respectively. We performed logistic regression to identify potential variables that correlated with vaccine acceptance. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, focus group interviews with four key stakeholder groups explored implementation facilitators and barriers. RESULTS: We screened 406 patients for COVID-19 vaccination eligibility and current vaccine status, the majority of whom were unvaccinated. Of unvaccinated or partially vaccinated patients, vaccine acceptance before education was 28.3% (81/286), and vaccine acceptance after education was 31.5% (90/286) (% difference, 3.1% [95% CI 0.3%–5.9%], P=0.03). The most common hesitancy factors cited were concerns about side effects and safety. Results from the regression analysis indicated that increasing age and Black race were associated with an increased odds of vaccine acceptance. Focus groups revealed implementation barriers, including patient resistance and workflow issues, and facilitators, including student involvement and public health promotion. CONCLUSION: Using medical and pharmacy student volunteers as COVID-19 vaccine screeners was successful, and brief education provided by the students led to a modest increase in vaccine acceptance, with overall acceptance of 31.5%. Numerous educational benefits are described. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2023-05 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10284509/ /pubmed/37278772 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.58728 Text en © 2023 Eastin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Research
Eastin, Carly
Moore, Brendan
Moulton, Aaron
Lefler, Luke
Haydar, Fuad
Sweere, Morgan
Jones, Gavin
Sparks, Crystal
Porter, Austin
Allison, M. Kathryn
Eastin, Travis
Vaccine Acceptance During a Novel Student-led Emergency Department COVID-19 Vaccination Program
title Vaccine Acceptance During a Novel Student-led Emergency Department COVID-19 Vaccination Program
title_full Vaccine Acceptance During a Novel Student-led Emergency Department COVID-19 Vaccination Program
title_fullStr Vaccine Acceptance During a Novel Student-led Emergency Department COVID-19 Vaccination Program
title_full_unstemmed Vaccine Acceptance During a Novel Student-led Emergency Department COVID-19 Vaccination Program
title_short Vaccine Acceptance During a Novel Student-led Emergency Department COVID-19 Vaccination Program
title_sort vaccine acceptance during a novel student-led emergency department covid-19 vaccination program
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37278772
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.58728
work_keys_str_mv AT eastincarly vaccineacceptanceduringanovelstudentledemergencydepartmentcovid19vaccinationprogram
AT moorebrendan vaccineacceptanceduringanovelstudentledemergencydepartmentcovid19vaccinationprogram
AT moultonaaron vaccineacceptanceduringanovelstudentledemergencydepartmentcovid19vaccinationprogram
AT leflerluke vaccineacceptanceduringanovelstudentledemergencydepartmentcovid19vaccinationprogram
AT haydarfuad vaccineacceptanceduringanovelstudentledemergencydepartmentcovid19vaccinationprogram
AT sweeremorgan vaccineacceptanceduringanovelstudentledemergencydepartmentcovid19vaccinationprogram
AT jonesgavin vaccineacceptanceduringanovelstudentledemergencydepartmentcovid19vaccinationprogram
AT sparkscrystal vaccineacceptanceduringanovelstudentledemergencydepartmentcovid19vaccinationprogram
AT porteraustin vaccineacceptanceduringanovelstudentledemergencydepartmentcovid19vaccinationprogram
AT allisonmkathryn vaccineacceptanceduringanovelstudentledemergencydepartmentcovid19vaccinationprogram
AT eastintravis vaccineacceptanceduringanovelstudentledemergencydepartmentcovid19vaccinationprogram