Cargando…

Disparities Exist in the Application of Low Tidal-volume Ventilation in the Emergency Department

INTRODUCTION: Low tidal-volume ventilation (LTVV), defined as a maximum tidal volume of 8 milliliters per kilogram (mL/kg) of ideal body weight, is a key component of lung protective ventilation. Although emergency department (ED) initiation of LTVV has been associated with improved outcomes, dispar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Self, Michael, Kennis, Brent, Lafree, Andrew, Tainter, Christopher R., Lopez, Jesus, Malhotra, Atul, Chan, Theodore, Wardi, Gabriel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37278778
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.59291
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Low tidal-volume ventilation (LTVV), defined as a maximum tidal volume of 8 milliliters per kilogram (mL/kg) of ideal body weight, is a key component of lung protective ventilation. Although emergency department (ED) initiation of LTVV has been associated with improved outcomes, disparities in LTVV application exist. In this study our aim was to evaluate whether rates of LTVV are associated with demographic and physical characteristics in the ED. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study using a dataset of patients who underwent mechanical ventilation at three EDs in two health systems from January 2016–June 2019. Demographic, mechanical ventilation, and outcome data including mortality and hospital-free days were abstracted by automatic query. A LTVV approach was defined as a tidal volume ≤8 mL/kg ideal body weight. We performed descriptive statistics and univariate analysis as indicated, and created a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of 1,029 patients included in the study, 79.5% received LTVV. Tidal volumes of 400–500 mL were used in 81.9% of patients. Approximately 18% of patients had tidal volumes changed in the ED. Female gender (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.17, P< 0.001), obesity (aOR 2.27, P< 0.001), and first-quartile height (aOR 12.2, P < 0.001) were associated with receiving non-LTVV in multivariate regression analysis. Hispanic ethnicity and female gender were associated with first quartile height (68.5%, 43.7%, P < 0.001 for all). Hispanic ethnicity was associated with receiving non-LTVV in univariate analysis (40.8% vs 23.0%, P < 0.001). This relationship did not persist in sensitivity analysis controlling for height, weight, gender, and body mass index. Patients who received LTVV in the ED had 2.1 more hospital-free days compared to those who did not (P = 0.040). No difference in mortality was observed. CONCLUSION: Emergency physicians use a narrow range of initial tidal volumes that may not meet lung-protective ventilation goals, with few corrections. Female gender, obesity, and first-quartile height are independently associated with receiving non-LTVV in the ED. Using LTVV in the ED was associated with 2.1 fewer hospital-free days. If confirmed in future studies, these findings have important implications for achieving quality improvement and health equality.