Cargando…
Factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms
The exploration of oral microbiome has been increasing due to its relatedness with various systemic diseases, but standardization of saliva sampling for microbiome analysis has not been established, contributing to the lack of data comparability. Here, we evaluated the factors that influence the mic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37246-2 |
_version_ | 1785061487842164736 |
---|---|
author | Bang, Eunsik Oh, Sujin Ju, Uijin Chang, Ho Eun Hong, Jin-Sil Baek, Hyeong-Jin Kim, Keun-Suh Lee, Hyo-Jung Park, Kyoung Un |
author_facet | Bang, Eunsik Oh, Sujin Ju, Uijin Chang, Ho Eun Hong, Jin-Sil Baek, Hyeong-Jin Kim, Keun-Suh Lee, Hyo-Jung Park, Kyoung Un |
author_sort | Bang, Eunsik |
collection | PubMed |
description | The exploration of oral microbiome has been increasing due to its relatedness with various systemic diseases, but standardization of saliva sampling for microbiome analysis has not been established, contributing to the lack of data comparability. Here, we evaluated the factors that influence the microbiome data. Saliva samples were collected by the two collection methods (passive drooling and mouthwash) using three saliva-preservation methods (OMNIgene, DNA/RNA shield, and simple collection). A total of 18 samples were sequenced by both Illumina short-read and Nanopore long-read next-generation sequencing (NGS). The component of the oral microbiome in each sample was compared with alpha and beta diversity and the taxonomic abundances, to find out the effects of factors on oral microbiome data. The alpha diversity indices of the mouthwash sample were significantly higher than that of the drooling group with both short-read and long-read NGS, while no significant differences in microbial diversities were found between the three saliva-preservation methods. Our study shows mouthwash and simple collection are not inferior to other sample collection and saliva-preservation methods, respectively. This result is promising since the convenience and cost-effectiveness of mouthwash and simple collection can simplify the saliva sample preparation, which would greatly help clinical operators and lab workers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10284873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102848732023-06-23 Factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms Bang, Eunsik Oh, Sujin Ju, Uijin Chang, Ho Eun Hong, Jin-Sil Baek, Hyeong-Jin Kim, Keun-Suh Lee, Hyo-Jung Park, Kyoung Un Sci Rep Article The exploration of oral microbiome has been increasing due to its relatedness with various systemic diseases, but standardization of saliva sampling for microbiome analysis has not been established, contributing to the lack of data comparability. Here, we evaluated the factors that influence the microbiome data. Saliva samples were collected by the two collection methods (passive drooling and mouthwash) using three saliva-preservation methods (OMNIgene, DNA/RNA shield, and simple collection). A total of 18 samples were sequenced by both Illumina short-read and Nanopore long-read next-generation sequencing (NGS). The component of the oral microbiome in each sample was compared with alpha and beta diversity and the taxonomic abundances, to find out the effects of factors on oral microbiome data. The alpha diversity indices of the mouthwash sample were significantly higher than that of the drooling group with both short-read and long-read NGS, while no significant differences in microbial diversities were found between the three saliva-preservation methods. Our study shows mouthwash and simple collection are not inferior to other sample collection and saliva-preservation methods, respectively. This result is promising since the convenience and cost-effectiveness of mouthwash and simple collection can simplify the saliva sample preparation, which would greatly help clinical operators and lab workers. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10284873/ /pubmed/37344534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37246-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Bang, Eunsik Oh, Sujin Ju, Uijin Chang, Ho Eun Hong, Jin-Sil Baek, Hyeong-Jin Kim, Keun-Suh Lee, Hyo-Jung Park, Kyoung Un Factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms |
title | Factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms |
title_full | Factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms |
title_fullStr | Factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms |
title_short | Factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms |
title_sort | factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37246-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bangeunsik factorsinfluencingoralmicrobiomeanalysisfromsalivasamplingmethodstonextgenerationsequencingplatforms AT ohsujin factorsinfluencingoralmicrobiomeanalysisfromsalivasamplingmethodstonextgenerationsequencingplatforms AT juuijin factorsinfluencingoralmicrobiomeanalysisfromsalivasamplingmethodstonextgenerationsequencingplatforms AT changhoeun factorsinfluencingoralmicrobiomeanalysisfromsalivasamplingmethodstonextgenerationsequencingplatforms AT hongjinsil factorsinfluencingoralmicrobiomeanalysisfromsalivasamplingmethodstonextgenerationsequencingplatforms AT baekhyeongjin factorsinfluencingoralmicrobiomeanalysisfromsalivasamplingmethodstonextgenerationsequencingplatforms AT kimkeunsuh factorsinfluencingoralmicrobiomeanalysisfromsalivasamplingmethodstonextgenerationsequencingplatforms AT leehyojung factorsinfluencingoralmicrobiomeanalysisfromsalivasamplingmethodstonextgenerationsequencingplatforms AT parkkyoungun factorsinfluencingoralmicrobiomeanalysisfromsalivasamplingmethodstonextgenerationsequencingplatforms |