Cargando…

Factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms

The exploration of oral microbiome has been increasing due to its relatedness with various systemic diseases, but standardization of saliva sampling for microbiome analysis has not been established, contributing to the lack of data comparability. Here, we evaluated the factors that influence the mic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bang, Eunsik, Oh, Sujin, Ju, Uijin, Chang, Ho Eun, Hong, Jin-Sil, Baek, Hyeong-Jin, Kim, Keun-Suh, Lee, Hyo-Jung, Park, Kyoung Un
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37246-2
_version_ 1785061487842164736
author Bang, Eunsik
Oh, Sujin
Ju, Uijin
Chang, Ho Eun
Hong, Jin-Sil
Baek, Hyeong-Jin
Kim, Keun-Suh
Lee, Hyo-Jung
Park, Kyoung Un
author_facet Bang, Eunsik
Oh, Sujin
Ju, Uijin
Chang, Ho Eun
Hong, Jin-Sil
Baek, Hyeong-Jin
Kim, Keun-Suh
Lee, Hyo-Jung
Park, Kyoung Un
author_sort Bang, Eunsik
collection PubMed
description The exploration of oral microbiome has been increasing due to its relatedness with various systemic diseases, but standardization of saliva sampling for microbiome analysis has not been established, contributing to the lack of data comparability. Here, we evaluated the factors that influence the microbiome data. Saliva samples were collected by the two collection methods (passive drooling and mouthwash) using three saliva-preservation methods (OMNIgene, DNA/RNA shield, and simple collection). A total of 18 samples were sequenced by both Illumina short-read and Nanopore long-read next-generation sequencing (NGS). The component of the oral microbiome in each sample was compared with alpha and beta diversity and the taxonomic abundances, to find out the effects of factors on oral microbiome data. The alpha diversity indices of the mouthwash sample were significantly higher than that of the drooling group with both short-read and long-read NGS, while no significant differences in microbial diversities were found between the three saliva-preservation methods. Our study shows mouthwash and simple collection are not inferior to other sample collection and saliva-preservation methods, respectively. This result is promising since the convenience and cost-effectiveness of mouthwash and simple collection can simplify the saliva sample preparation, which would greatly help clinical operators and lab workers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10284873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102848732023-06-23 Factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms Bang, Eunsik Oh, Sujin Ju, Uijin Chang, Ho Eun Hong, Jin-Sil Baek, Hyeong-Jin Kim, Keun-Suh Lee, Hyo-Jung Park, Kyoung Un Sci Rep Article The exploration of oral microbiome has been increasing due to its relatedness with various systemic diseases, but standardization of saliva sampling for microbiome analysis has not been established, contributing to the lack of data comparability. Here, we evaluated the factors that influence the microbiome data. Saliva samples were collected by the two collection methods (passive drooling and mouthwash) using three saliva-preservation methods (OMNIgene, DNA/RNA shield, and simple collection). A total of 18 samples were sequenced by both Illumina short-read and Nanopore long-read next-generation sequencing (NGS). The component of the oral microbiome in each sample was compared with alpha and beta diversity and the taxonomic abundances, to find out the effects of factors on oral microbiome data. The alpha diversity indices of the mouthwash sample were significantly higher than that of the drooling group with both short-read and long-read NGS, while no significant differences in microbial diversities were found between the three saliva-preservation methods. Our study shows mouthwash and simple collection are not inferior to other sample collection and saliva-preservation methods, respectively. This result is promising since the convenience and cost-effectiveness of mouthwash and simple collection can simplify the saliva sample preparation, which would greatly help clinical operators and lab workers. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10284873/ /pubmed/37344534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37246-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Bang, Eunsik
Oh, Sujin
Ju, Uijin
Chang, Ho Eun
Hong, Jin-Sil
Baek, Hyeong-Jin
Kim, Keun-Suh
Lee, Hyo-Jung
Park, Kyoung Un
Factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms
title Factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms
title_full Factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms
title_fullStr Factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms
title_short Factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms
title_sort factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37246-2
work_keys_str_mv AT bangeunsik factorsinfluencingoralmicrobiomeanalysisfromsalivasamplingmethodstonextgenerationsequencingplatforms
AT ohsujin factorsinfluencingoralmicrobiomeanalysisfromsalivasamplingmethodstonextgenerationsequencingplatforms
AT juuijin factorsinfluencingoralmicrobiomeanalysisfromsalivasamplingmethodstonextgenerationsequencingplatforms
AT changhoeun factorsinfluencingoralmicrobiomeanalysisfromsalivasamplingmethodstonextgenerationsequencingplatforms
AT hongjinsil factorsinfluencingoralmicrobiomeanalysisfromsalivasamplingmethodstonextgenerationsequencingplatforms
AT baekhyeongjin factorsinfluencingoralmicrobiomeanalysisfromsalivasamplingmethodstonextgenerationsequencingplatforms
AT kimkeunsuh factorsinfluencingoralmicrobiomeanalysisfromsalivasamplingmethodstonextgenerationsequencingplatforms
AT leehyojung factorsinfluencingoralmicrobiomeanalysisfromsalivasamplingmethodstonextgenerationsequencingplatforms
AT parkkyoungun factorsinfluencingoralmicrobiomeanalysisfromsalivasamplingmethodstonextgenerationsequencingplatforms