Cargando…

Engineering-geological comparative analysis of four cases studies of waste landfills

The aim of the paper is to carry out a comparative engineering-geological study of four different waste landfills using the evaluation criteria for the geological subsoil as a natural sealing barrier. The study evaluates 4 localities (Velké Pavlovice, Kvítkovice, Prakšice and Horní Suchá) using thre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marschalko, Marian, Popielarczyk, Dariusz, Vicherek, Petr, Niemiec, Dominik, Kubac, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36790-1
_version_ 1785061489277665280
author Marschalko, Marian
Popielarczyk, Dariusz
Vicherek, Petr
Niemiec, Dominik
Kubac, Jan
author_facet Marschalko, Marian
Popielarczyk, Dariusz
Vicherek, Petr
Niemiec, Dominik
Kubac, Jan
author_sort Marschalko, Marian
collection PubMed
description The aim of the paper is to carry out a comparative engineering-geological study of four different waste landfills using the evaluation criteria for the geological subsoil as a natural sealing barrier. The study evaluates 4 localities (Velké Pavlovice, Kvítkovice, Prakšice and Horní Suchá) using three variants (based on two standards) which approach the geological barrier requirements as a combination of impermeability requirements based on a filtration coefficient limit value. and the required geometry represented by investigation depths. The research was carried out in landfills in Moravia, in the east of the Czech Republic. The study’s motivation is to point at the differences in engineering-geological investigations of waste landfills (as for the requirements for impermeable geological subsoil as a natural sealing barrier) when compared with other engineering structures (where the main goal is to evaluate load-bearing capacity and settlement). The purpose of the geological barrier is to prevent the spread of contamination, and the paper shows this can be approached differently, as shown in two different methodologies investigated herein. The first model (Model 1) assumes there is a 3-m-thick subsoil below the landfill’s footing bottom, which manifests impermeability characterized by the filtration coefficient K(f) ≤ 1.0 * 10(–9) m/s, or a 30-m-thick subsoil of K(f) ≤ 1.0 * 10(–8) m/s. The second model (Model 2) assumes a 1-m thick, impermeable subsoil massif of K(f) ≤ 1.0 * 10(–9) m/s. We found that none of the landfills in the four selected localities had an impermeable layer in the required depth (a filtration coefficient K(f) from 1.8 * 10(–9) to 3.9 * 10(–9) m/s), and thus did not comply with the limiting conditions. As a result, an anthropogenic technical barrier had to be installed. An important goal of the study from an environmental point of view was to assess the existence of a suitable geological barrier under the proposed landfills. The most important criterion from this point of view is permeability. An additional technical objective of the project was also the assessment of the possible creation of a technical anthropogenic isolation barrier. In the event that the natural sealing barrier would not be sufficient. This was shown in all solved case studies of engineering geological investigations of waste landfills.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10284879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102848792023-06-23 Engineering-geological comparative analysis of four cases studies of waste landfills Marschalko, Marian Popielarczyk, Dariusz Vicherek, Petr Niemiec, Dominik Kubac, Jan Sci Rep Article The aim of the paper is to carry out a comparative engineering-geological study of four different waste landfills using the evaluation criteria for the geological subsoil as a natural sealing barrier. The study evaluates 4 localities (Velké Pavlovice, Kvítkovice, Prakšice and Horní Suchá) using three variants (based on two standards) which approach the geological barrier requirements as a combination of impermeability requirements based on a filtration coefficient limit value. and the required geometry represented by investigation depths. The research was carried out in landfills in Moravia, in the east of the Czech Republic. The study’s motivation is to point at the differences in engineering-geological investigations of waste landfills (as for the requirements for impermeable geological subsoil as a natural sealing barrier) when compared with other engineering structures (where the main goal is to evaluate load-bearing capacity and settlement). The purpose of the geological barrier is to prevent the spread of contamination, and the paper shows this can be approached differently, as shown in two different methodologies investigated herein. The first model (Model 1) assumes there is a 3-m-thick subsoil below the landfill’s footing bottom, which manifests impermeability characterized by the filtration coefficient K(f) ≤ 1.0 * 10(–9) m/s, or a 30-m-thick subsoil of K(f) ≤ 1.0 * 10(–8) m/s. The second model (Model 2) assumes a 1-m thick, impermeable subsoil massif of K(f) ≤ 1.0 * 10(–9) m/s. We found that none of the landfills in the four selected localities had an impermeable layer in the required depth (a filtration coefficient K(f) from 1.8 * 10(–9) to 3.9 * 10(–9) m/s), and thus did not comply with the limiting conditions. As a result, an anthropogenic technical barrier had to be installed. An important goal of the study from an environmental point of view was to assess the existence of a suitable geological barrier under the proposed landfills. The most important criterion from this point of view is permeability. An additional technical objective of the project was also the assessment of the possible creation of a technical anthropogenic isolation barrier. In the event that the natural sealing barrier would not be sufficient. This was shown in all solved case studies of engineering geological investigations of waste landfills. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10284879/ /pubmed/37344527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36790-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Marschalko, Marian
Popielarczyk, Dariusz
Vicherek, Petr
Niemiec, Dominik
Kubac, Jan
Engineering-geological comparative analysis of four cases studies of waste landfills
title Engineering-geological comparative analysis of four cases studies of waste landfills
title_full Engineering-geological comparative analysis of four cases studies of waste landfills
title_fullStr Engineering-geological comparative analysis of four cases studies of waste landfills
title_full_unstemmed Engineering-geological comparative analysis of four cases studies of waste landfills
title_short Engineering-geological comparative analysis of four cases studies of waste landfills
title_sort engineering-geological comparative analysis of four cases studies of waste landfills
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36790-1
work_keys_str_mv AT marschalkomarian engineeringgeologicalcomparativeanalysisoffourcasesstudiesofwastelandfills
AT popielarczykdariusz engineeringgeologicalcomparativeanalysisoffourcasesstudiesofwastelandfills
AT vicherekpetr engineeringgeologicalcomparativeanalysisoffourcasesstudiesofwastelandfills
AT niemiecdominik engineeringgeologicalcomparativeanalysisoffourcasesstudiesofwastelandfills
AT kubacjan engineeringgeologicalcomparativeanalysisoffourcasesstudiesofwastelandfills