Cargando…
Fresh embryo transfer in the cleavage and blastocyst stages and pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Advances in cell culture media have led to a trend of embryo transfer from the early cleavage stages to blastocyst stage. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to compare the effects of fresh embryo transfer in cleavage and blastocyst stage on pregnancy outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-se...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Knowledge E
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37362096 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v21i5.13477 |
_version_ | 1785061558704930816 |
---|---|
author | Mahsa Poormoosavi, Seyedeh Amin Behmanesh, Mohammad Aryannejad, Sara Janati, Sima |
author_facet | Mahsa Poormoosavi, Seyedeh Amin Behmanesh, Mohammad Aryannejad, Sara Janati, Sima |
author_sort | Mahsa Poormoosavi, Seyedeh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Advances in cell culture media have led to a trend of embryo transfer from the early cleavage stages to blastocyst stage. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to compare the effects of fresh embryo transfer in cleavage and blastocyst stage on pregnancy outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 1422 cases referred to the Umm-al-Banin Infertility Clinic Center, Dezful, Iran, between July 2013 and December 2020 who were candidates for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection for fresh embryo transfer. A total of 1246 cases were divided into 4 categories on days 2-5 or 6. Chemical and clinical pregnancy, abortion, multifetal pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rates were analyzed. RESULTS: Fresh embryo transfer was performed in 28.5% of the cases on the 2 [Formula: see text] day, 45.8% on the 3 [Formula: see text] , 15.3% on the 4 [Formula: see text] day, and 10.4% on days 5 or 6. The overall clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were estimated at 20.6% and 17.6% in the cleavage, and 17% and 14% in the blastocyst stages, respectively. However, no significant difference was observed in either group. In addition, there was no significant difference between groups in terms of the abortion, multifetal pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy rate (p [Formula: see text] 0.05). CONCLUSION: According to the results, the consequences of pregnancy in fresh embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage were not superior to embryo transfer at different stages of the cleavage process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10285195 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Knowledge E |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102851952023-06-23 Fresh embryo transfer in the cleavage and blastocyst stages and pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective cross-sectional study Mahsa Poormoosavi, Seyedeh Amin Behmanesh, Mohammad Aryannejad, Sara Janati, Sima Int J Reprod Biomed Original Article BACKGROUND: Advances in cell culture media have led to a trend of embryo transfer from the early cleavage stages to blastocyst stage. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to compare the effects of fresh embryo transfer in cleavage and blastocyst stage on pregnancy outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 1422 cases referred to the Umm-al-Banin Infertility Clinic Center, Dezful, Iran, between July 2013 and December 2020 who were candidates for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection for fresh embryo transfer. A total of 1246 cases were divided into 4 categories on days 2-5 or 6. Chemical and clinical pregnancy, abortion, multifetal pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rates were analyzed. RESULTS: Fresh embryo transfer was performed in 28.5% of the cases on the 2 [Formula: see text] day, 45.8% on the 3 [Formula: see text] , 15.3% on the 4 [Formula: see text] day, and 10.4% on days 5 or 6. The overall clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were estimated at 20.6% and 17.6% in the cleavage, and 17% and 14% in the blastocyst stages, respectively. However, no significant difference was observed in either group. In addition, there was no significant difference between groups in terms of the abortion, multifetal pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy rate (p [Formula: see text] 0.05). CONCLUSION: According to the results, the consequences of pregnancy in fresh embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage were not superior to embryo transfer at different stages of the cleavage process. Knowledge E 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10285195/ /pubmed/37362096 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v21i5.13477 Text en Copyright © 2023 Poormoosavi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mahsa Poormoosavi, Seyedeh Amin Behmanesh, Mohammad Aryannejad, Sara Janati, Sima Fresh embryo transfer in the cleavage and blastocyst stages and pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective cross-sectional study |
title | Fresh embryo transfer in the cleavage and blastocyst stages and pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective cross-sectional study |
title_full | Fresh embryo transfer in the cleavage and blastocyst stages and pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Fresh embryo transfer in the cleavage and blastocyst stages and pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Fresh embryo transfer in the cleavage and blastocyst stages and pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective cross-sectional study |
title_short | Fresh embryo transfer in the cleavage and blastocyst stages and pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective cross-sectional study |
title_sort | fresh embryo transfer in the cleavage and blastocyst stages and pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cross-sectional study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37362096 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v21i5.13477 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahsapoormoosaviseyedeh freshembryotransferinthecleavageandblastocyststagesandpregnancyoutcomesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT aminbehmaneshmohammad freshembryotransferinthecleavageandblastocyststagesandpregnancyoutcomesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT aryannejadsara freshembryotransferinthecleavageandblastocyststagesandpregnancyoutcomesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT janatisima freshembryotransferinthecleavageandblastocyststagesandpregnancyoutcomesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy |