Cargando…
Digital vs. physical ear-nose-and-throat specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid treatment: a randomized controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: This study introduces a digital assessment tool for asynchronous and remote ear-nose-and-throat (ENT) specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid (HA) treatment. The +60 population will nearly do...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1182421 |
_version_ | 1785061601648312320 |
---|---|
author | Siggaard, Lene Dahl Jacobsen, Henrik Hougaard, Dan Dupont Høgsbro, Morten |
author_facet | Siggaard, Lene Dahl Jacobsen, Henrik Hougaard, Dan Dupont Høgsbro, Morten |
author_sort | Siggaard, Lene Dahl |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This study introduces a digital assessment tool for asynchronous and remote ear-nose-and-throat (ENT) specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid (HA) treatment. The +60 population will nearly double from 12% to 22% between 2015 and 2050 increasing the incidence of age-induced hearing impairment and the need for hearing rehabilitation. If un-diagnosed, age-related hearing loss negatively affects quality of life by accelerating social distancing and early retirement as well as increasing risk of anxiety, depression, and dementia. Therefore, innovative measures are essential to provide timely diagnostics and treatment. METHODS: A total of 751 hearing-impaired adults without previous HA usage or experience were randomly assigned to digital or physical ENT specialist assessment screening prior to HA treatment initiation in 20 public and private hearing rehabilitation and ENT specialist clinics in the North Denmark Region. A total of 501 test group participants were assigned to digital assessment screening and 250 control group participants to physical assessment screening prior to HA treatment. RESULTS: In all, 658 (88%) participants completed the trial and were eligible for analysis. Digital screening sensitivity (0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–0.94) was significantly higher than physical screening sensitivity (0.2, 95% CI: 0.03–0.56). Screening specificity was high for both assessment methods. DISCUSSION: In a setting where hearing-impaired adults were assessed for HA treatment, digital ENT specialist assessment screening did not compromise patient safety or increase the risk of misdiagnosis in patients with complicated hearing loss and/or serious ear disorders when compared to physical ENT specialist assessment screening. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05154539, identifier: NCT05154539. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10285396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102853962023-06-23 Digital vs. physical ear-nose-and-throat specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid treatment: a randomized controlled trial Siggaard, Lene Dahl Jacobsen, Henrik Hougaard, Dan Dupont Høgsbro, Morten Front Digit Health Digital Health INTRODUCTION: This study introduces a digital assessment tool for asynchronous and remote ear-nose-and-throat (ENT) specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid (HA) treatment. The +60 population will nearly double from 12% to 22% between 2015 and 2050 increasing the incidence of age-induced hearing impairment and the need for hearing rehabilitation. If un-diagnosed, age-related hearing loss negatively affects quality of life by accelerating social distancing and early retirement as well as increasing risk of anxiety, depression, and dementia. Therefore, innovative measures are essential to provide timely diagnostics and treatment. METHODS: A total of 751 hearing-impaired adults without previous HA usage or experience were randomly assigned to digital or physical ENT specialist assessment screening prior to HA treatment initiation in 20 public and private hearing rehabilitation and ENT specialist clinics in the North Denmark Region. A total of 501 test group participants were assigned to digital assessment screening and 250 control group participants to physical assessment screening prior to HA treatment. RESULTS: In all, 658 (88%) participants completed the trial and were eligible for analysis. Digital screening sensitivity (0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–0.94) was significantly higher than physical screening sensitivity (0.2, 95% CI: 0.03–0.56). Screening specificity was high for both assessment methods. DISCUSSION: In a setting where hearing-impaired adults were assessed for HA treatment, digital ENT specialist assessment screening did not compromise patient safety or increase the risk of misdiagnosis in patients with complicated hearing loss and/or serious ear disorders when compared to physical ENT specialist assessment screening. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05154539, identifier: NCT05154539. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10285396/ /pubmed/37363275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1182421 Text en © 2023 Siggaard, Jacobsen, Hougaard and Høgsbro. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Digital Health Siggaard, Lene Dahl Jacobsen, Henrik Hougaard, Dan Dupont Høgsbro, Morten Digital vs. physical ear-nose-and-throat specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Digital vs. physical ear-nose-and-throat specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Digital vs. physical ear-nose-and-throat specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Digital vs. physical ear-nose-and-throat specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital vs. physical ear-nose-and-throat specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Digital vs. physical ear-nose-and-throat specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | digital vs. physical ear-nose-and-throat specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Digital Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1182421 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT siggaardlenedahl digitalvsphysicalearnoseandthroatspecialistassessmentscreeningforcomplicatedhearinglossandseriouseardisordersinhearingimpairedadultspriortohearingaidtreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jacobsenhenrik digitalvsphysicalearnoseandthroatspecialistassessmentscreeningforcomplicatedhearinglossandseriouseardisordersinhearingimpairedadultspriortohearingaidtreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hougaarddandupont digitalvsphysicalearnoseandthroatspecialistassessmentscreeningforcomplicatedhearinglossandseriouseardisordersinhearingimpairedadultspriortohearingaidtreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT høgsbromorten digitalvsphysicalearnoseandthroatspecialistassessmentscreeningforcomplicatedhearinglossandseriouseardisordersinhearingimpairedadultspriortohearingaidtreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial |