Cargando…

Digital vs. physical ear-nose-and-throat specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid treatment: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: This study introduces a digital assessment tool for asynchronous and remote ear-nose-and-throat (ENT) specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid (HA) treatment. The +60 population will nearly do...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siggaard, Lene Dahl, Jacobsen, Henrik, Hougaard, Dan Dupont, Høgsbro, Morten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363275
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1182421
_version_ 1785061601648312320
author Siggaard, Lene Dahl
Jacobsen, Henrik
Hougaard, Dan Dupont
Høgsbro, Morten
author_facet Siggaard, Lene Dahl
Jacobsen, Henrik
Hougaard, Dan Dupont
Høgsbro, Morten
author_sort Siggaard, Lene Dahl
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study introduces a digital assessment tool for asynchronous and remote ear-nose-and-throat (ENT) specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid (HA) treatment. The +60 population will nearly double from 12% to 22% between 2015 and 2050 increasing the incidence of age-induced hearing impairment and the need for hearing rehabilitation. If un-diagnosed, age-related hearing loss negatively affects quality of life by accelerating social distancing and early retirement as well as increasing risk of anxiety, depression, and dementia. Therefore, innovative measures are essential to provide timely diagnostics and treatment. METHODS: A total of 751 hearing-impaired adults without previous HA usage or experience were randomly assigned to digital or physical ENT specialist assessment screening prior to HA treatment initiation in 20 public and private hearing rehabilitation and ENT specialist clinics in the North Denmark Region. A total of 501 test group participants were assigned to digital assessment screening and 250 control group participants to physical assessment screening prior to HA treatment. RESULTS: In all, 658 (88%) participants completed the trial and were eligible for analysis. Digital screening sensitivity (0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–0.94) was significantly higher than physical screening sensitivity (0.2, 95% CI: 0.03–0.56). Screening specificity was high for both assessment methods. DISCUSSION: In a setting where hearing-impaired adults were assessed for HA treatment, digital ENT specialist assessment screening did not compromise patient safety or increase the risk of misdiagnosis in patients with complicated hearing loss and/or serious ear disorders when compared to physical ENT specialist assessment screening. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05154539, identifier: NCT05154539.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10285396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102853962023-06-23 Digital vs. physical ear-nose-and-throat specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid treatment: a randomized controlled trial Siggaard, Lene Dahl Jacobsen, Henrik Hougaard, Dan Dupont Høgsbro, Morten Front Digit Health Digital Health INTRODUCTION: This study introduces a digital assessment tool for asynchronous and remote ear-nose-and-throat (ENT) specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid (HA) treatment. The +60 population will nearly double from 12% to 22% between 2015 and 2050 increasing the incidence of age-induced hearing impairment and the need for hearing rehabilitation. If un-diagnosed, age-related hearing loss negatively affects quality of life by accelerating social distancing and early retirement as well as increasing risk of anxiety, depression, and dementia. Therefore, innovative measures are essential to provide timely diagnostics and treatment. METHODS: A total of 751 hearing-impaired adults without previous HA usage or experience were randomly assigned to digital or physical ENT specialist assessment screening prior to HA treatment initiation in 20 public and private hearing rehabilitation and ENT specialist clinics in the North Denmark Region. A total of 501 test group participants were assigned to digital assessment screening and 250 control group participants to physical assessment screening prior to HA treatment. RESULTS: In all, 658 (88%) participants completed the trial and were eligible for analysis. Digital screening sensitivity (0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–0.94) was significantly higher than physical screening sensitivity (0.2, 95% CI: 0.03–0.56). Screening specificity was high for both assessment methods. DISCUSSION: In a setting where hearing-impaired adults were assessed for HA treatment, digital ENT specialist assessment screening did not compromise patient safety or increase the risk of misdiagnosis in patients with complicated hearing loss and/or serious ear disorders when compared to physical ENT specialist assessment screening. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05154539, identifier: NCT05154539. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10285396/ /pubmed/37363275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1182421 Text en © 2023 Siggaard, Jacobsen, Hougaard and Høgsbro. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Digital Health
Siggaard, Lene Dahl
Jacobsen, Henrik
Hougaard, Dan Dupont
Høgsbro, Morten
Digital vs. physical ear-nose-and-throat specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid treatment: a randomized controlled trial
title Digital vs. physical ear-nose-and-throat specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid treatment: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Digital vs. physical ear-nose-and-throat specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid treatment: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Digital vs. physical ear-nose-and-throat specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid treatment: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Digital vs. physical ear-nose-and-throat specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid treatment: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Digital vs. physical ear-nose-and-throat specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid treatment: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort digital vs. physical ear-nose-and-throat specialist assessment screening for complicated hearing loss and serious ear disorders in hearing-impaired adults prior to hearing aid treatment: a randomized controlled trial
topic Digital Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363275
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1182421
work_keys_str_mv AT siggaardlenedahl digitalvsphysicalearnoseandthroatspecialistassessmentscreeningforcomplicatedhearinglossandseriouseardisordersinhearingimpairedadultspriortohearingaidtreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jacobsenhenrik digitalvsphysicalearnoseandthroatspecialistassessmentscreeningforcomplicatedhearinglossandseriouseardisordersinhearingimpairedadultspriortohearingaidtreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hougaarddandupont digitalvsphysicalearnoseandthroatspecialistassessmentscreeningforcomplicatedhearinglossandseriouseardisordersinhearingimpairedadultspriortohearingaidtreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT høgsbromorten digitalvsphysicalearnoseandthroatspecialistassessmentscreeningforcomplicatedhearinglossandseriouseardisordersinhearingimpairedadultspriortohearingaidtreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial