Cargando…

An effectiveness-implementation trial protocol to evaluate PrEP initiation among U.S. cisgender women using eHealth tools vs. standard care

BACKGROUND: The United States' (U.S.) initiative to End the HIV Epidemic aims to reduce new HIV infections in areas of high HIV prevalence. Despite national efforts to reduce HIV incidence, cisgender women continue to represent approximately one out of every five new HIV diagnoses in the U.S. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Izadi, Lillee H., Mmeje, Okeoma, Drabo, Emmanuel F., Perin, Jamie, Martin, Stephen, Coleman, Jenell S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37361343
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frph.2023.1196392
_version_ 1785061608696840192
author Izadi, Lillee H.
Mmeje, Okeoma
Drabo, Emmanuel F.
Perin, Jamie
Martin, Stephen
Coleman, Jenell S.
author_facet Izadi, Lillee H.
Mmeje, Okeoma
Drabo, Emmanuel F.
Perin, Jamie
Martin, Stephen
Coleman, Jenell S.
author_sort Izadi, Lillee H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The United States' (U.S.) initiative to End the HIV Epidemic aims to reduce new HIV infections in areas of high HIV prevalence. Despite national efforts to reduce HIV incidence, cisgender women continue to represent approximately one out of every five new HIV diagnoses in the U.S. Taking pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention strategy; however, PrEP initiation among cisgender women is suboptimal, with only 10% of eligible women receiving PrEP prescriptions in 2019. METHODS: We designed a trial to test the effectiveness of interventions to increase PrEP initiation, while evaluating the implementation strategy (hybrid type II trial) in seven obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) clinics (two federally qualified health centers, three community-based, and two academic) in Baltimore, Maryland. A total of 42 OB/GYN providers will be enrolled and randomized (1:1:1) into one of three clinical trial arms (standard of care, patient-level intervention, or multi-level intervention). Eligible patients of enrolled providers will receive a sexual health questionnaire before their appointment through the electronic health record’s (EHR) patient portal. The questionnaire will be scored in three tiers (low, moderate, and high) to assess HIV risk. Patients at low risk will be offered an HIV test only, while those who score medium or high risk will be included in the clinical trial and assigned to the clinical trial arm associated with their provider. Differences in PrEP initiation, our primary outcome, across the three arms will be analyzed using generalized linear mixed-effect models with logistic regression. We will adjust results for demographic differences observed between arms and examine PrEP initiation stratified by patient’s and provider’s race and ethnicity.Additionally, a comprehensive economic analysis for each intervention will be conducted. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that gathering information on sensitive sexual behaviors electronically, communicating HIV risk in an understandable and relatable format to patients and OB/GYN providers, and deploying EHR alerts will increase PrEP initiation and HIV testing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05412433) on 09 June 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05412433?term=NCT05412433&draw=2&rank=1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10285440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102854402023-06-23 An effectiveness-implementation trial protocol to evaluate PrEP initiation among U.S. cisgender women using eHealth tools vs. standard care Izadi, Lillee H. Mmeje, Okeoma Drabo, Emmanuel F. Perin, Jamie Martin, Stephen Coleman, Jenell S. Front Reprod Health Reproductive Health BACKGROUND: The United States' (U.S.) initiative to End the HIV Epidemic aims to reduce new HIV infections in areas of high HIV prevalence. Despite national efforts to reduce HIV incidence, cisgender women continue to represent approximately one out of every five new HIV diagnoses in the U.S. Taking pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention strategy; however, PrEP initiation among cisgender women is suboptimal, with only 10% of eligible women receiving PrEP prescriptions in 2019. METHODS: We designed a trial to test the effectiveness of interventions to increase PrEP initiation, while evaluating the implementation strategy (hybrid type II trial) in seven obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) clinics (two federally qualified health centers, three community-based, and two academic) in Baltimore, Maryland. A total of 42 OB/GYN providers will be enrolled and randomized (1:1:1) into one of three clinical trial arms (standard of care, patient-level intervention, or multi-level intervention). Eligible patients of enrolled providers will receive a sexual health questionnaire before their appointment through the electronic health record’s (EHR) patient portal. The questionnaire will be scored in three tiers (low, moderate, and high) to assess HIV risk. Patients at low risk will be offered an HIV test only, while those who score medium or high risk will be included in the clinical trial and assigned to the clinical trial arm associated with their provider. Differences in PrEP initiation, our primary outcome, across the three arms will be analyzed using generalized linear mixed-effect models with logistic regression. We will adjust results for demographic differences observed between arms and examine PrEP initiation stratified by patient’s and provider’s race and ethnicity.Additionally, a comprehensive economic analysis for each intervention will be conducted. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that gathering information on sensitive sexual behaviors electronically, communicating HIV risk in an understandable and relatable format to patients and OB/GYN providers, and deploying EHR alerts will increase PrEP initiation and HIV testing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05412433) on 09 June 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05412433?term=NCT05412433&draw=2&rank=1. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10285440/ /pubmed/37361343 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frph.2023.1196392 Text en © 2023 Izadi, Mmeje, Drabo, Perin, Martin and Coleman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Reproductive Health
Izadi, Lillee H.
Mmeje, Okeoma
Drabo, Emmanuel F.
Perin, Jamie
Martin, Stephen
Coleman, Jenell S.
An effectiveness-implementation trial protocol to evaluate PrEP initiation among U.S. cisgender women using eHealth tools vs. standard care
title An effectiveness-implementation trial protocol to evaluate PrEP initiation among U.S. cisgender women using eHealth tools vs. standard care
title_full An effectiveness-implementation trial protocol to evaluate PrEP initiation among U.S. cisgender women using eHealth tools vs. standard care
title_fullStr An effectiveness-implementation trial protocol to evaluate PrEP initiation among U.S. cisgender women using eHealth tools vs. standard care
title_full_unstemmed An effectiveness-implementation trial protocol to evaluate PrEP initiation among U.S. cisgender women using eHealth tools vs. standard care
title_short An effectiveness-implementation trial protocol to evaluate PrEP initiation among U.S. cisgender women using eHealth tools vs. standard care
title_sort effectiveness-implementation trial protocol to evaluate prep initiation among u.s. cisgender women using ehealth tools vs. standard care
topic Reproductive Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37361343
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frph.2023.1196392
work_keys_str_mv AT izadililleeh aneffectivenessimplementationtrialprotocoltoevaluateprepinitiationamonguscisgenderwomenusingehealthtoolsvsstandardcare
AT mmejeokeoma aneffectivenessimplementationtrialprotocoltoevaluateprepinitiationamonguscisgenderwomenusingehealthtoolsvsstandardcare
AT draboemmanuelf aneffectivenessimplementationtrialprotocoltoevaluateprepinitiationamonguscisgenderwomenusingehealthtoolsvsstandardcare
AT perinjamie aneffectivenessimplementationtrialprotocoltoevaluateprepinitiationamonguscisgenderwomenusingehealthtoolsvsstandardcare
AT martinstephen aneffectivenessimplementationtrialprotocoltoevaluateprepinitiationamonguscisgenderwomenusingehealthtoolsvsstandardcare
AT colemanjenells aneffectivenessimplementationtrialprotocoltoevaluateprepinitiationamonguscisgenderwomenusingehealthtoolsvsstandardcare
AT izadililleeh effectivenessimplementationtrialprotocoltoevaluateprepinitiationamonguscisgenderwomenusingehealthtoolsvsstandardcare
AT mmejeokeoma effectivenessimplementationtrialprotocoltoevaluateprepinitiationamonguscisgenderwomenusingehealthtoolsvsstandardcare
AT draboemmanuelf effectivenessimplementationtrialprotocoltoevaluateprepinitiationamonguscisgenderwomenusingehealthtoolsvsstandardcare
AT perinjamie effectivenessimplementationtrialprotocoltoevaluateprepinitiationamonguscisgenderwomenusingehealthtoolsvsstandardcare
AT martinstephen effectivenessimplementationtrialprotocoltoevaluateprepinitiationamonguscisgenderwomenusingehealthtoolsvsstandardcare
AT colemanjenells effectivenessimplementationtrialprotocoltoevaluateprepinitiationamonguscisgenderwomenusingehealthtoolsvsstandardcare