Cargando…

Combined optogenetic and electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve for selective control of sensory fibers

INTRODUCTION: Electrical stimulation offers a drug-free alternative for the treatment of many neurological conditions, such as chronic pain. However, it is not easy to selectively activate afferent or efferent fibers of mixed nerves, nor their functional subtypes. Optogenetics overcomes these issues...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matarazzo, Jerico V., Ajay, Elise A., Payne, Sophie C., Trang, Ella P., Thompson, Alex C., Marroquin, Jason B., Wise, Andrew K., Fallon, James B., Richardson, Rachael T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37360169
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1190662
_version_ 1785061624308039680
author Matarazzo, Jerico V.
Ajay, Elise A.
Payne, Sophie C.
Trang, Ella P.
Thompson, Alex C.
Marroquin, Jason B.
Wise, Andrew K.
Fallon, James B.
Richardson, Rachael T.
author_facet Matarazzo, Jerico V.
Ajay, Elise A.
Payne, Sophie C.
Trang, Ella P.
Thompson, Alex C.
Marroquin, Jason B.
Wise, Andrew K.
Fallon, James B.
Richardson, Rachael T.
author_sort Matarazzo, Jerico V.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Electrical stimulation offers a drug-free alternative for the treatment of many neurological conditions, such as chronic pain. However, it is not easy to selectively activate afferent or efferent fibers of mixed nerves, nor their functional subtypes. Optogenetics overcomes these issues by controlling activity selectively in genetically modified fibers, however the reliability of responses to light are poor compared to electrical stimulation and the high intensities of light required present considerable translational challenges. In this study we employed a combined protocol of optical and electrical stimulation to the sciatic nerve in an optogenetic mouse model to allow for better selectivity, efficiency, and safety to overcome fundamental limitations of electrical-only and optical-only stimulation. METHODS: The sciatic nerve was surgically exposed in anesthetized mice (n = 12) expressing the ChR2-H134R opsin via the parvalbumin promoter. A custom-made peripheral nerve cuff electrode and a 452 nm laser-coupled optical fiber were used to elicit neural activity utilizing optical-only, electrical-only, or combined stimulation. Activation thresholds for the individual and combined responses were measured. RESULTS: Optically evoked responses had a conduction velocity of 34.3 m/s, consistent with ChR2-H134R expression in proprioceptive and low-threshold mechanoreceptor (Aα/Aβ) fibers which was also confirmed via immunohistochemical methods. Combined stimulation, utilizing a 1 ms near-threshold light pulse followed by an electrical pulse 0.5 ms later, approximately halved the electrical threshold for activation (p = 0.006, n = 5) and resulted in a 5.5 dB increase in the Aα/Aβ hybrid response amplitude compared to the electrical-only response at equivalent electrical levels (p = 0.003, n = 6). As a result, there was a 3.25 dB increase in the therapeutic stimulation window between the Aα/Aβ fiber and myogenic thresholds (p = 0.008, n = 4). DISCUSSION: The results demonstrate that light can be used to prime the optogenetically modified neural population to reside near threshold, thereby selectively reducing the electrical threshold for neural activation in these fibers. This reduces the amount of light needed for activation for increased safety and reduces potential off-target effects by only stimulating the fibers of interest. Since Aα/Aβ fibers are potential targets for neuromodulation in chronic pain conditions, these findings could be used to develop effective strategies to selectively manipulate pain transmission pathways in the periphery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10285517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102855172023-06-23 Combined optogenetic and electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve for selective control of sensory fibers Matarazzo, Jerico V. Ajay, Elise A. Payne, Sophie C. Trang, Ella P. Thompson, Alex C. Marroquin, Jason B. Wise, Andrew K. Fallon, James B. Richardson, Rachael T. Front Neurosci Neuroscience INTRODUCTION: Electrical stimulation offers a drug-free alternative for the treatment of many neurological conditions, such as chronic pain. However, it is not easy to selectively activate afferent or efferent fibers of mixed nerves, nor their functional subtypes. Optogenetics overcomes these issues by controlling activity selectively in genetically modified fibers, however the reliability of responses to light are poor compared to electrical stimulation and the high intensities of light required present considerable translational challenges. In this study we employed a combined protocol of optical and electrical stimulation to the sciatic nerve in an optogenetic mouse model to allow for better selectivity, efficiency, and safety to overcome fundamental limitations of electrical-only and optical-only stimulation. METHODS: The sciatic nerve was surgically exposed in anesthetized mice (n = 12) expressing the ChR2-H134R opsin via the parvalbumin promoter. A custom-made peripheral nerve cuff electrode and a 452 nm laser-coupled optical fiber were used to elicit neural activity utilizing optical-only, electrical-only, or combined stimulation. Activation thresholds for the individual and combined responses were measured. RESULTS: Optically evoked responses had a conduction velocity of 34.3 m/s, consistent with ChR2-H134R expression in proprioceptive and low-threshold mechanoreceptor (Aα/Aβ) fibers which was also confirmed via immunohistochemical methods. Combined stimulation, utilizing a 1 ms near-threshold light pulse followed by an electrical pulse 0.5 ms later, approximately halved the electrical threshold for activation (p = 0.006, n = 5) and resulted in a 5.5 dB increase in the Aα/Aβ hybrid response amplitude compared to the electrical-only response at equivalent electrical levels (p = 0.003, n = 6). As a result, there was a 3.25 dB increase in the therapeutic stimulation window between the Aα/Aβ fiber and myogenic thresholds (p = 0.008, n = 4). DISCUSSION: The results demonstrate that light can be used to prime the optogenetically modified neural population to reside near threshold, thereby selectively reducing the electrical threshold for neural activation in these fibers. This reduces the amount of light needed for activation for increased safety and reduces potential off-target effects by only stimulating the fibers of interest. Since Aα/Aβ fibers are potential targets for neuromodulation in chronic pain conditions, these findings could be used to develop effective strategies to selectively manipulate pain transmission pathways in the periphery. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10285517/ /pubmed/37360169 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1190662 Text en Copyright © 2023 Matarazzo, Ajay, Payne, Trang, Thompson, Marroquin, Wise, Fallon and Richardson. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Matarazzo, Jerico V.
Ajay, Elise A.
Payne, Sophie C.
Trang, Ella P.
Thompson, Alex C.
Marroquin, Jason B.
Wise, Andrew K.
Fallon, James B.
Richardson, Rachael T.
Combined optogenetic and electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve for selective control of sensory fibers
title Combined optogenetic and electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve for selective control of sensory fibers
title_full Combined optogenetic and electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve for selective control of sensory fibers
title_fullStr Combined optogenetic and electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve for selective control of sensory fibers
title_full_unstemmed Combined optogenetic and electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve for selective control of sensory fibers
title_short Combined optogenetic and electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve for selective control of sensory fibers
title_sort combined optogenetic and electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve for selective control of sensory fibers
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37360169
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1190662
work_keys_str_mv AT matarazzojericov combinedoptogeneticandelectricalstimulationofthesciaticnerveforselectivecontrolofsensoryfibers
AT ajayelisea combinedoptogeneticandelectricalstimulationofthesciaticnerveforselectivecontrolofsensoryfibers
AT paynesophiec combinedoptogeneticandelectricalstimulationofthesciaticnerveforselectivecontrolofsensoryfibers
AT trangellap combinedoptogeneticandelectricalstimulationofthesciaticnerveforselectivecontrolofsensoryfibers
AT thompsonalexc combinedoptogeneticandelectricalstimulationofthesciaticnerveforselectivecontrolofsensoryfibers
AT marroquinjasonb combinedoptogeneticandelectricalstimulationofthesciaticnerveforselectivecontrolofsensoryfibers
AT wiseandrewk combinedoptogeneticandelectricalstimulationofthesciaticnerveforselectivecontrolofsensoryfibers
AT fallonjamesb combinedoptogeneticandelectricalstimulationofthesciaticnerveforselectivecontrolofsensoryfibers
AT richardsonrachaelt combinedoptogeneticandelectricalstimulationofthesciaticnerveforselectivecontrolofsensoryfibers