Cargando…

Obstacles and facilitators of cancer-related dyadic efficacy experienced by couples coping with non-metastatic cancers

INTRODUCTION: Cancer-related dyadic efficacy is an individual’s confidence to work together with a partner to conjointly manage the effects of cancer and its treatment. In other health contexts, higher levels of dyadic efficacy have been associated with fewer symptoms of psychological distress and h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brosseau, Danielle C., Peláez, Sandra, Ananng, Bethsheba, Körner, Annett
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359859
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.949443
_version_ 1785061657116934144
author Brosseau, Danielle C.
Peláez, Sandra
Ananng, Bethsheba
Körner, Annett
author_facet Brosseau, Danielle C.
Peláez, Sandra
Ananng, Bethsheba
Körner, Annett
author_sort Brosseau, Danielle C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cancer-related dyadic efficacy is an individual’s confidence to work together with a partner to conjointly manage the effects of cancer and its treatment. In other health contexts, higher levels of dyadic efficacy have been associated with fewer symptoms of psychological distress and higher ratings of relationship satisfaction. The aim of the current study was to explore patient and partner perspectives on what obstructs and facilitates cancer-related dyadic efficacy. METHODS: These aims were accomplished through a secondary analysis of data collected as a part of a collective qualitative case study. Participants (N = 17 participants) were patients undergoing treatment or recently completed treatment (within 6 months) for a non-metastatic cancer and their partners. To enable in-depth discussions among participants, data was collected through five focus groups. Participants described obstacles and facilitators of dyadic efficacy as dimensions of a common influence. Consistent with these descriptions, reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify influences on cancer-related dyadic efficacy and their subsequent obstructive and facilitative dimensions. RESULTS: Four main categories of influence with the potential to obstruct or facilitate cancer-related dyadic efficacy were identified along with their subthemes: appraisals of the couple relationship (quality and togetherness), communication (pattern and interest in information), coping (strategy and evaluation), and responses to change (in tasks and roles and sex life). Eight obstructive and seven facilitative dimensions of these subthemes were described.Discussion: This first analysis of obstacles and facilitators of couples’ cancer-related dyadic efficacy capitalized on the experiential expertise of individuals with cancer and their partners. These thematic results are instructive for the design of dyadic efficacy-enhancing interventions for couples coping with cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10285665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102856652023-06-23 Obstacles and facilitators of cancer-related dyadic efficacy experienced by couples coping with non-metastatic cancers Brosseau, Danielle C. Peláez, Sandra Ananng, Bethsheba Körner, Annett Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: Cancer-related dyadic efficacy is an individual’s confidence to work together with a partner to conjointly manage the effects of cancer and its treatment. In other health contexts, higher levels of dyadic efficacy have been associated with fewer symptoms of psychological distress and higher ratings of relationship satisfaction. The aim of the current study was to explore patient and partner perspectives on what obstructs and facilitates cancer-related dyadic efficacy. METHODS: These aims were accomplished through a secondary analysis of data collected as a part of a collective qualitative case study. Participants (N = 17 participants) were patients undergoing treatment or recently completed treatment (within 6 months) for a non-metastatic cancer and their partners. To enable in-depth discussions among participants, data was collected through five focus groups. Participants described obstacles and facilitators of dyadic efficacy as dimensions of a common influence. Consistent with these descriptions, reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify influences on cancer-related dyadic efficacy and their subsequent obstructive and facilitative dimensions. RESULTS: Four main categories of influence with the potential to obstruct or facilitate cancer-related dyadic efficacy were identified along with their subthemes: appraisals of the couple relationship (quality and togetherness), communication (pattern and interest in information), coping (strategy and evaluation), and responses to change (in tasks and roles and sex life). Eight obstructive and seven facilitative dimensions of these subthemes were described.Discussion: This first analysis of obstacles and facilitators of couples’ cancer-related dyadic efficacy capitalized on the experiential expertise of individuals with cancer and their partners. These thematic results are instructive for the design of dyadic efficacy-enhancing interventions for couples coping with cancer. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10285665/ /pubmed/37359859 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.949443 Text en Copyright © 2023 Brosseau, Peláez, Ananng and Körner. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Brosseau, Danielle C.
Peláez, Sandra
Ananng, Bethsheba
Körner, Annett
Obstacles and facilitators of cancer-related dyadic efficacy experienced by couples coping with non-metastatic cancers
title Obstacles and facilitators of cancer-related dyadic efficacy experienced by couples coping with non-metastatic cancers
title_full Obstacles and facilitators of cancer-related dyadic efficacy experienced by couples coping with non-metastatic cancers
title_fullStr Obstacles and facilitators of cancer-related dyadic efficacy experienced by couples coping with non-metastatic cancers
title_full_unstemmed Obstacles and facilitators of cancer-related dyadic efficacy experienced by couples coping with non-metastatic cancers
title_short Obstacles and facilitators of cancer-related dyadic efficacy experienced by couples coping with non-metastatic cancers
title_sort obstacles and facilitators of cancer-related dyadic efficacy experienced by couples coping with non-metastatic cancers
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359859
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.949443
work_keys_str_mv AT brosseaudaniellec obstaclesandfacilitatorsofcancerrelateddyadicefficacyexperiencedbycouplescopingwithnonmetastaticcancers
AT pelaezsandra obstaclesandfacilitatorsofcancerrelateddyadicefficacyexperiencedbycouplescopingwithnonmetastaticcancers
AT ananngbethsheba obstaclesandfacilitatorsofcancerrelateddyadicefficacyexperiencedbycouplescopingwithnonmetastaticcancers
AT kornerannett obstaclesandfacilitatorsofcancerrelateddyadicefficacyexperiencedbycouplescopingwithnonmetastaticcancers