Cargando…
An Evaluation of Local Implementing Partner Performance During the First 2 Years of the USAID/PEPFAR Transition
INTRODUCTION: Locally led and owned development is considered the best practice for international aid. As an implementing agency for the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) supported the goal of transitioning 70% of its port...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Global Health: Science and Practice
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37348934 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00337 |
_version_ | 1785061667257712640 |
---|---|
author | White, Lauren A. Avery, Latham Bonanno, Lindsay Knight, Christy Irwin, Courtney Hoeflich, Kathryn Kaliel, Deborah Hijazi, Mai Raulfs-Wang, E. Callie |
author_facet | White, Lauren A. Avery, Latham Bonanno, Lindsay Knight, Christy Irwin, Courtney Hoeflich, Kathryn Kaliel, Deborah Hijazi, Mai Raulfs-Wang, E. Callie |
author_sort | White, Lauren A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Locally led and owned development is considered the best practice for international aid. As an implementing agency for the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) supported the goal of transitioning 70% of its portfolio funding directly to local organizations by 2020, including partner country governments. However, limited evidence or evaluation exists on how such a transition can help achieve HIV-related health outcomes. METHODS: We evaluated monitoring, evaluation, and reporting performance; calculated indicators; and quality of service across the HIV/AIDS treatment cascade for local and international partners in the USAID/PEPFAR portfolio implementing similar programs during the U.S. Government fiscal years (FY) 2019 to 2020 (October 1, 2018–September 30, 2020). We compared results aggregated globally, by country, and across individual partners. RESULTS: Globally, local partners met a lower proportion of their treatment targets than international partners and did not meet targets for pre-exposure prophylaxis or voluntary medical male circumcision in FY2020. However, local partners exceeded targets in programs supporting orphans, vulnerable children, and key populations affected by HIV/AIDS. Local partners also had testing positivity, linkage rates, and viral load suppression that were equivalent to or higher than that of international partners. Based on available assessments, local partners displayed quality of service delivery comparable to international partners. CONCLUSION: Local partners faced challenges, including unfamiliarity with USAID funding, increasing targets across several indicators, and the syndemics of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19. A higher percentage of targets and funding led South African local partners to yield an outsized effect on global percent target achievement. While these findings should be interpreted cautiously due to limited sample size and short time horizon, they are a key first step in evaluating the local partner transition support of the long-term goal of sustained epidemic control of HIV/AIDS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10285723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Global Health: Science and Practice |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102857232023-06-23 An Evaluation of Local Implementing Partner Performance During the First 2 Years of the USAID/PEPFAR Transition White, Lauren A. Avery, Latham Bonanno, Lindsay Knight, Christy Irwin, Courtney Hoeflich, Kathryn Kaliel, Deborah Hijazi, Mai Raulfs-Wang, E. Callie Glob Health Sci Pract Article INTRODUCTION: Locally led and owned development is considered the best practice for international aid. As an implementing agency for the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) supported the goal of transitioning 70% of its portfolio funding directly to local organizations by 2020, including partner country governments. However, limited evidence or evaluation exists on how such a transition can help achieve HIV-related health outcomes. METHODS: We evaluated monitoring, evaluation, and reporting performance; calculated indicators; and quality of service across the HIV/AIDS treatment cascade for local and international partners in the USAID/PEPFAR portfolio implementing similar programs during the U.S. Government fiscal years (FY) 2019 to 2020 (October 1, 2018–September 30, 2020). We compared results aggregated globally, by country, and across individual partners. RESULTS: Globally, local partners met a lower proportion of their treatment targets than international partners and did not meet targets for pre-exposure prophylaxis or voluntary medical male circumcision in FY2020. However, local partners exceeded targets in programs supporting orphans, vulnerable children, and key populations affected by HIV/AIDS. Local partners also had testing positivity, linkage rates, and viral load suppression that were equivalent to or higher than that of international partners. Based on available assessments, local partners displayed quality of service delivery comparable to international partners. CONCLUSION: Local partners faced challenges, including unfamiliarity with USAID funding, increasing targets across several indicators, and the syndemics of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19. A higher percentage of targets and funding led South African local partners to yield an outsized effect on global percent target achievement. While these findings should be interpreted cautiously due to limited sample size and short time horizon, they are a key first step in evaluating the local partner transition support of the long-term goal of sustained epidemic control of HIV/AIDS. Global Health: Science and Practice 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10285723/ /pubmed/37348934 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00337 Text en © White et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00337 |
spellingShingle | Article White, Lauren A. Avery, Latham Bonanno, Lindsay Knight, Christy Irwin, Courtney Hoeflich, Kathryn Kaliel, Deborah Hijazi, Mai Raulfs-Wang, E. Callie An Evaluation of Local Implementing Partner Performance During the First 2 Years of the USAID/PEPFAR Transition |
title | An Evaluation of Local Implementing Partner Performance During the First 2 Years of the USAID/PEPFAR Transition |
title_full | An Evaluation of Local Implementing Partner Performance During the First 2 Years of the USAID/PEPFAR Transition |
title_fullStr | An Evaluation of Local Implementing Partner Performance During the First 2 Years of the USAID/PEPFAR Transition |
title_full_unstemmed | An Evaluation of Local Implementing Partner Performance During the First 2 Years of the USAID/PEPFAR Transition |
title_short | An Evaluation of Local Implementing Partner Performance During the First 2 Years of the USAID/PEPFAR Transition |
title_sort | evaluation of local implementing partner performance during the first 2 years of the usaid/pepfar transition |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37348934 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00337 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whitelaurena anevaluationoflocalimplementingpartnerperformanceduringthefirst2yearsoftheusaidpepfartransition AT averylatham anevaluationoflocalimplementingpartnerperformanceduringthefirst2yearsoftheusaidpepfartransition AT bonannolindsay anevaluationoflocalimplementingpartnerperformanceduringthefirst2yearsoftheusaidpepfartransition AT knightchristy anevaluationoflocalimplementingpartnerperformanceduringthefirst2yearsoftheusaidpepfartransition AT irwincourtney anevaluationoflocalimplementingpartnerperformanceduringthefirst2yearsoftheusaidpepfartransition AT hoeflichkathryn anevaluationoflocalimplementingpartnerperformanceduringthefirst2yearsoftheusaidpepfartransition AT kalieldeborah anevaluationoflocalimplementingpartnerperformanceduringthefirst2yearsoftheusaidpepfartransition AT hijazimai anevaluationoflocalimplementingpartnerperformanceduringthefirst2yearsoftheusaidpepfartransition AT raulfswangecallie anevaluationoflocalimplementingpartnerperformanceduringthefirst2yearsoftheusaidpepfartransition AT whitelaurena evaluationoflocalimplementingpartnerperformanceduringthefirst2yearsoftheusaidpepfartransition AT averylatham evaluationoflocalimplementingpartnerperformanceduringthefirst2yearsoftheusaidpepfartransition AT bonannolindsay evaluationoflocalimplementingpartnerperformanceduringthefirst2yearsoftheusaidpepfartransition AT knightchristy evaluationoflocalimplementingpartnerperformanceduringthefirst2yearsoftheusaidpepfartransition AT irwincourtney evaluationoflocalimplementingpartnerperformanceduringthefirst2yearsoftheusaidpepfartransition AT hoeflichkathryn evaluationoflocalimplementingpartnerperformanceduringthefirst2yearsoftheusaidpepfartransition AT kalieldeborah evaluationoflocalimplementingpartnerperformanceduringthefirst2yearsoftheusaidpepfartransition AT hijazimai evaluationoflocalimplementingpartnerperformanceduringthefirst2yearsoftheusaidpepfartransition AT raulfswangecallie evaluationoflocalimplementingpartnerperformanceduringthefirst2yearsoftheusaidpepfartransition |