Cargando…

Measuring National Immunization System Performance: A Systematic Assessment of Available Resources

BACKGROUND: Vaccination coverage is widely used to assess immunization performance but, on its own, provides insufficient information to drive improvements. Assessing the performance of underlying components of immunization systems is less clear, with several monitoring and evaluation (M&E) reso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Cyra, Rendell, Nicole, Sargent, Ginny M., Ali, Akeem, Morgan, Christopher, Fields, Rebecca, Sheel, Meru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Global Health: Science and Practice 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37348935
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00555
_version_ 1785061668186750976
author Patel, Cyra
Rendell, Nicole
Sargent, Ginny M.
Ali, Akeem
Morgan, Christopher
Fields, Rebecca
Sheel, Meru
author_facet Patel, Cyra
Rendell, Nicole
Sargent, Ginny M.
Ali, Akeem
Morgan, Christopher
Fields, Rebecca
Sheel, Meru
author_sort Patel, Cyra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vaccination coverage is widely used to assess immunization performance but, on its own, provides insufficient information to drive improvements. Assessing the performance of underlying components of immunization systems is less clear, with several monitoring and evaluation (M&E) resources available for use in different operational settings and for different purposes. We studied these resources to understand how immunization system performance is measured. METHODS: We reviewed peer-reviewed and gray literature published since 2000 to identify M&E resources that include national-level indicators measuring the performance of immunization systems or their components (governance, financing, regulation, information systems, vaccine logistics, workforce, service delivery, and demand generation). We summarize indicators by the system components or outcomes measured and describe findings narratively. RESULTS: We identified 20 resources to monitor immunization program objectives and guide national strategic decision-making, encompassing 631 distinct indicators. Indicators for immunization program outcomes comprised the majority (124/631 [19.7%]), largely vaccination coverage (110/124 [88.7%]). Almost all resources (19/20 [95%]) included indicators for vaccine logistics (83/631 [13.2%]), and those for regulation (19/631 [3.0%]) and demand generation (28/631 [4.4%]) were least common. There was heterogeneity in how information systems (92/563 [14.6%]) and workforce (47/631 [7.4%]) were assessed across resources. Indicators for vaccination coverage in adults, data use in decision-making, equity and diversity, effectiveness of safety surveillance, and availability of a public health workforce were notably lacking. CONCLUSIONS: Between the resources identified in this review, we identified considerable variability and gaps in indicators assessing the performance of some immunization system components. Given the multitude of indicators, policymakers may be better served by tailoring evaluation resources to their specific context to gain useful insight into health system performance and improve data use in decision-making for immunization programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10285727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Global Health: Science and Practice
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102857272023-06-23 Measuring National Immunization System Performance: A Systematic Assessment of Available Resources Patel, Cyra Rendell, Nicole Sargent, Ginny M. Ali, Akeem Morgan, Christopher Fields, Rebecca Sheel, Meru Glob Health Sci Pract Review BACKGROUND: Vaccination coverage is widely used to assess immunization performance but, on its own, provides insufficient information to drive improvements. Assessing the performance of underlying components of immunization systems is less clear, with several monitoring and evaluation (M&E) resources available for use in different operational settings and for different purposes. We studied these resources to understand how immunization system performance is measured. METHODS: We reviewed peer-reviewed and gray literature published since 2000 to identify M&E resources that include national-level indicators measuring the performance of immunization systems or their components (governance, financing, regulation, information systems, vaccine logistics, workforce, service delivery, and demand generation). We summarize indicators by the system components or outcomes measured and describe findings narratively. RESULTS: We identified 20 resources to monitor immunization program objectives and guide national strategic decision-making, encompassing 631 distinct indicators. Indicators for immunization program outcomes comprised the majority (124/631 [19.7%]), largely vaccination coverage (110/124 [88.7%]). Almost all resources (19/20 [95%]) included indicators for vaccine logistics (83/631 [13.2%]), and those for regulation (19/631 [3.0%]) and demand generation (28/631 [4.4%]) were least common. There was heterogeneity in how information systems (92/563 [14.6%]) and workforce (47/631 [7.4%]) were assessed across resources. Indicators for vaccination coverage in adults, data use in decision-making, equity and diversity, effectiveness of safety surveillance, and availability of a public health workforce were notably lacking. CONCLUSIONS: Between the resources identified in this review, we identified considerable variability and gaps in indicators assessing the performance of some immunization system components. Given the multitude of indicators, policymakers may be better served by tailoring evaluation resources to their specific context to gain useful insight into health system performance and improve data use in decision-making for immunization programs. Global Health: Science and Practice 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10285727/ /pubmed/37348935 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00555 Text en © Patel et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00555
spellingShingle Review
Patel, Cyra
Rendell, Nicole
Sargent, Ginny M.
Ali, Akeem
Morgan, Christopher
Fields, Rebecca
Sheel, Meru
Measuring National Immunization System Performance: A Systematic Assessment of Available Resources
title Measuring National Immunization System Performance: A Systematic Assessment of Available Resources
title_full Measuring National Immunization System Performance: A Systematic Assessment of Available Resources
title_fullStr Measuring National Immunization System Performance: A Systematic Assessment of Available Resources
title_full_unstemmed Measuring National Immunization System Performance: A Systematic Assessment of Available Resources
title_short Measuring National Immunization System Performance: A Systematic Assessment of Available Resources
title_sort measuring national immunization system performance: a systematic assessment of available resources
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37348935
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00555
work_keys_str_mv AT patelcyra measuringnationalimmunizationsystemperformanceasystematicassessmentofavailableresources
AT rendellnicole measuringnationalimmunizationsystemperformanceasystematicassessmentofavailableresources
AT sargentginnym measuringnationalimmunizationsystemperformanceasystematicassessmentofavailableresources
AT aliakeem measuringnationalimmunizationsystemperformanceasystematicassessmentofavailableresources
AT morganchristopher measuringnationalimmunizationsystemperformanceasystematicassessmentofavailableresources
AT fieldsrebecca measuringnationalimmunizationsystemperformanceasystematicassessmentofavailableresources
AT sheelmeru measuringnationalimmunizationsystemperformanceasystematicassessmentofavailableresources