Cargando…
Measuring National Immunization System Performance: A Systematic Assessment of Available Resources
BACKGROUND: Vaccination coverage is widely used to assess immunization performance but, on its own, provides insufficient information to drive improvements. Assessing the performance of underlying components of immunization systems is less clear, with several monitoring and evaluation (M&E) reso...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Global Health: Science and Practice
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37348935 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00555 |
_version_ | 1785061668186750976 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Cyra Rendell, Nicole Sargent, Ginny M. Ali, Akeem Morgan, Christopher Fields, Rebecca Sheel, Meru |
author_facet | Patel, Cyra Rendell, Nicole Sargent, Ginny M. Ali, Akeem Morgan, Christopher Fields, Rebecca Sheel, Meru |
author_sort | Patel, Cyra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Vaccination coverage is widely used to assess immunization performance but, on its own, provides insufficient information to drive improvements. Assessing the performance of underlying components of immunization systems is less clear, with several monitoring and evaluation (M&E) resources available for use in different operational settings and for different purposes. We studied these resources to understand how immunization system performance is measured. METHODS: We reviewed peer-reviewed and gray literature published since 2000 to identify M&E resources that include national-level indicators measuring the performance of immunization systems or their components (governance, financing, regulation, information systems, vaccine logistics, workforce, service delivery, and demand generation). We summarize indicators by the system components or outcomes measured and describe findings narratively. RESULTS: We identified 20 resources to monitor immunization program objectives and guide national strategic decision-making, encompassing 631 distinct indicators. Indicators for immunization program outcomes comprised the majority (124/631 [19.7%]), largely vaccination coverage (110/124 [88.7%]). Almost all resources (19/20 [95%]) included indicators for vaccine logistics (83/631 [13.2%]), and those for regulation (19/631 [3.0%]) and demand generation (28/631 [4.4%]) were least common. There was heterogeneity in how information systems (92/563 [14.6%]) and workforce (47/631 [7.4%]) were assessed across resources. Indicators for vaccination coverage in adults, data use in decision-making, equity and diversity, effectiveness of safety surveillance, and availability of a public health workforce were notably lacking. CONCLUSIONS: Between the resources identified in this review, we identified considerable variability and gaps in indicators assessing the performance of some immunization system components. Given the multitude of indicators, policymakers may be better served by tailoring evaluation resources to their specific context to gain useful insight into health system performance and improve data use in decision-making for immunization programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10285727 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Global Health: Science and Practice |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102857272023-06-23 Measuring National Immunization System Performance: A Systematic Assessment of Available Resources Patel, Cyra Rendell, Nicole Sargent, Ginny M. Ali, Akeem Morgan, Christopher Fields, Rebecca Sheel, Meru Glob Health Sci Pract Review BACKGROUND: Vaccination coverage is widely used to assess immunization performance but, on its own, provides insufficient information to drive improvements. Assessing the performance of underlying components of immunization systems is less clear, with several monitoring and evaluation (M&E) resources available for use in different operational settings and for different purposes. We studied these resources to understand how immunization system performance is measured. METHODS: We reviewed peer-reviewed and gray literature published since 2000 to identify M&E resources that include national-level indicators measuring the performance of immunization systems or their components (governance, financing, regulation, information systems, vaccine logistics, workforce, service delivery, and demand generation). We summarize indicators by the system components or outcomes measured and describe findings narratively. RESULTS: We identified 20 resources to monitor immunization program objectives and guide national strategic decision-making, encompassing 631 distinct indicators. Indicators for immunization program outcomes comprised the majority (124/631 [19.7%]), largely vaccination coverage (110/124 [88.7%]). Almost all resources (19/20 [95%]) included indicators for vaccine logistics (83/631 [13.2%]), and those for regulation (19/631 [3.0%]) and demand generation (28/631 [4.4%]) were least common. There was heterogeneity in how information systems (92/563 [14.6%]) and workforce (47/631 [7.4%]) were assessed across resources. Indicators for vaccination coverage in adults, data use in decision-making, equity and diversity, effectiveness of safety surveillance, and availability of a public health workforce were notably lacking. CONCLUSIONS: Between the resources identified in this review, we identified considerable variability and gaps in indicators assessing the performance of some immunization system components. Given the multitude of indicators, policymakers may be better served by tailoring evaluation resources to their specific context to gain useful insight into health system performance and improve data use in decision-making for immunization programs. Global Health: Science and Practice 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10285727/ /pubmed/37348935 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00555 Text en © Patel et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00555 |
spellingShingle | Review Patel, Cyra Rendell, Nicole Sargent, Ginny M. Ali, Akeem Morgan, Christopher Fields, Rebecca Sheel, Meru Measuring National Immunization System Performance: A Systematic Assessment of Available Resources |
title | Measuring National Immunization System Performance: A Systematic Assessment of Available Resources |
title_full | Measuring National Immunization System Performance: A Systematic Assessment of Available Resources |
title_fullStr | Measuring National Immunization System Performance: A Systematic Assessment of Available Resources |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring National Immunization System Performance: A Systematic Assessment of Available Resources |
title_short | Measuring National Immunization System Performance: A Systematic Assessment of Available Resources |
title_sort | measuring national immunization system performance: a systematic assessment of available resources |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37348935 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00555 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelcyra measuringnationalimmunizationsystemperformanceasystematicassessmentofavailableresources AT rendellnicole measuringnationalimmunizationsystemperformanceasystematicassessmentofavailableresources AT sargentginnym measuringnationalimmunizationsystemperformanceasystematicassessmentofavailableresources AT aliakeem measuringnationalimmunizationsystemperformanceasystematicassessmentofavailableresources AT morganchristopher measuringnationalimmunizationsystemperformanceasystematicassessmentofavailableresources AT fieldsrebecca measuringnationalimmunizationsystemperformanceasystematicassessmentofavailableresources AT sheelmeru measuringnationalimmunizationsystemperformanceasystematicassessmentofavailableresources |