Cargando…

Grouping by Time and Pitch Facilitates Free but Not Cued Recall for Word Lists in Normally-Hearing Listeners

Auditory memory is an important everyday skill evaluated more and more frequently in clinical settings as there is recently a greater recognition of the cost of hearing loss to cognitive systems. Testing often involves reading a list of unrelated items aloud; but prosodic variations in pitch and tim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sares, Anastasia G., Gilbert, Annie C., Zhang, Yue, Iordanov, Maria, Lehmann, Alexandre, Deroche, Mickael L. D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37338981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165231181757
_version_ 1785061692091138048
author Sares, Anastasia G.
Gilbert, Annie C.
Zhang, Yue
Iordanov, Maria
Lehmann, Alexandre
Deroche, Mickael L. D.
author_facet Sares, Anastasia G.
Gilbert, Annie C.
Zhang, Yue
Iordanov, Maria
Lehmann, Alexandre
Deroche, Mickael L. D.
author_sort Sares, Anastasia G.
collection PubMed
description Auditory memory is an important everyday skill evaluated more and more frequently in clinical settings as there is recently a greater recognition of the cost of hearing loss to cognitive systems. Testing often involves reading a list of unrelated items aloud; but prosodic variations in pitch and timing across the list can affect the number of items remembered. Here, we ran a series of online studies on normally-hearing participants to provide normative data (with a larger and more diverse population than the typical student sample) on a novel protocol characterizing the effects of suprasegmental properties in speech, namely investigating pitch patterns, fast and slow pacing, and interactions between pitch and time grouping. In addition to free recall, and in line with our desire to work eventually with individuals exhibiting more limited cognitive capacity, we included a cued recall task to help participants recover specifically the words forgotten during the free recall part. We replicated key findings from previous research, demonstrating the benefits of slower pacing and of grouping on free recall. However, only slower pacing led to better performance on cued recall, indicating that grouping effects may decay surprisingly fast (over a matter of one minute) compared to the effect of slowed pacing. These results provide a benchmark for future comparisons of short-term recall performance in hearing-impaired listeners and users of cochlear implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10286184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102861842023-06-23 Grouping by Time and Pitch Facilitates Free but Not Cued Recall for Word Lists in Normally-Hearing Listeners Sares, Anastasia G. Gilbert, Annie C. Zhang, Yue Iordanov, Maria Lehmann, Alexandre Deroche, Mickael L. D. Trends Hear Original Article Auditory memory is an important everyday skill evaluated more and more frequently in clinical settings as there is recently a greater recognition of the cost of hearing loss to cognitive systems. Testing often involves reading a list of unrelated items aloud; but prosodic variations in pitch and timing across the list can affect the number of items remembered. Here, we ran a series of online studies on normally-hearing participants to provide normative data (with a larger and more diverse population than the typical student sample) on a novel protocol characterizing the effects of suprasegmental properties in speech, namely investigating pitch patterns, fast and slow pacing, and interactions between pitch and time grouping. In addition to free recall, and in line with our desire to work eventually with individuals exhibiting more limited cognitive capacity, we included a cued recall task to help participants recover specifically the words forgotten during the free recall part. We replicated key findings from previous research, demonstrating the benefits of slower pacing and of grouping on free recall. However, only slower pacing led to better performance on cued recall, indicating that grouping effects may decay surprisingly fast (over a matter of one minute) compared to the effect of slowed pacing. These results provide a benchmark for future comparisons of short-term recall performance in hearing-impaired listeners and users of cochlear implants. SAGE Publications 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10286184/ /pubmed/37338981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165231181757 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Sares, Anastasia G.
Gilbert, Annie C.
Zhang, Yue
Iordanov, Maria
Lehmann, Alexandre
Deroche, Mickael L. D.
Grouping by Time and Pitch Facilitates Free but Not Cued Recall for Word Lists in Normally-Hearing Listeners
title Grouping by Time and Pitch Facilitates Free but Not Cued Recall for Word Lists in Normally-Hearing Listeners
title_full Grouping by Time and Pitch Facilitates Free but Not Cued Recall for Word Lists in Normally-Hearing Listeners
title_fullStr Grouping by Time and Pitch Facilitates Free but Not Cued Recall for Word Lists in Normally-Hearing Listeners
title_full_unstemmed Grouping by Time and Pitch Facilitates Free but Not Cued Recall for Word Lists in Normally-Hearing Listeners
title_short Grouping by Time and Pitch Facilitates Free but Not Cued Recall for Word Lists in Normally-Hearing Listeners
title_sort grouping by time and pitch facilitates free but not cued recall for word lists in normally-hearing listeners
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37338981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165231181757
work_keys_str_mv AT saresanastasiag groupingbytimeandpitchfacilitatesfreebutnotcuedrecallforwordlistsinnormallyhearinglisteners
AT gilbertanniec groupingbytimeandpitchfacilitatesfreebutnotcuedrecallforwordlistsinnormallyhearinglisteners
AT zhangyue groupingbytimeandpitchfacilitatesfreebutnotcuedrecallforwordlistsinnormallyhearinglisteners
AT iordanovmaria groupingbytimeandpitchfacilitatesfreebutnotcuedrecallforwordlistsinnormallyhearinglisteners
AT lehmannalexandre groupingbytimeandpitchfacilitatesfreebutnotcuedrecallforwordlistsinnormallyhearinglisteners
AT derochemickaelld groupingbytimeandpitchfacilitatesfreebutnotcuedrecallforwordlistsinnormallyhearinglisteners