Cargando…

Post-induction hypotension with remimazolam versus propofol in patients routinely administered angiotensin axis blockades: a randomized control trial

BACKGROUND: Certain routine medication could result in post-induction hypotension (PIH), such as angiotensin axis blockades, which are frequently administered as a first-line therapy against hypertension. Remimazolam is reportedly associated with lesser intraoperative hypotension than propofol. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Seung Woo, Kim, Sujin, Park, Ji-Hyoung, Cho, Yun Hyung, Jeon, Yeong-Gwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37349690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02188-9
_version_ 1785061724084240384
author Song, Seung Woo
Kim, Sujin
Park, Ji-Hyoung
Cho, Yun Hyung
Jeon, Yeong-Gwan
author_facet Song, Seung Woo
Kim, Sujin
Park, Ji-Hyoung
Cho, Yun Hyung
Jeon, Yeong-Gwan
author_sort Song, Seung Woo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Certain routine medication could result in post-induction hypotension (PIH), such as angiotensin axis blockades, which are frequently administered as a first-line therapy against hypertension. Remimazolam is reportedly associated with lesser intraoperative hypotension than propofol. This study compared the overall incidence of PIH following remimazolam or propofol administration in patients managed by angiotensin axis blockades. METHODS: This single-blind, parallel-group, randomized control trial was conducted in a tertiary university hospital in South Korea. Patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia were considered for enrollment if the inclusion criteria were met: administration of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, 19 to 65 years old, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification ≤ III, and no involvement in other clinical trials. The primary outcome was the overall incidence of PIH, defined as a mean blood pressure (MBP) < 65 mmHg or decrease by ≥ 30% of the baseline MBP. The time points of measurement were baseline, just before the initial intubation attempt, and 1, 5, 10, and 15 min following intubation. The heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and bispectral index were also recorded. Groups P and R included patients administered propofol and remimazolam, respectively, as an induction agent. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients were analyzed, of the 82 randomized patients. PIH was less frequent in group R than group P (62.5% versus 82.9%; t value 4.27, P = 0.04, adjusted odds ratio = 0.32 [95% confidence interval 0.10–0.99]). The decrease in the MBP from baseline was 9.6 mmHg lesser in group R than in group P before the initial intubation attempt (95% confidence interval 3.3–15.9). A similar trend was observed for systolic and diastolic blood pressures. No severe adverse events were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: Remimazolam results in less frequent PIH than propofol in patients undergoing routine administration of angiotensin axis blockades. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was retrospectively registered on Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Republic of Korea (KCT0007488). Registration date: 30/06/2022.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10286332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102863322023-06-23 Post-induction hypotension with remimazolam versus propofol in patients routinely administered angiotensin axis blockades: a randomized control trial Song, Seung Woo Kim, Sujin Park, Ji-Hyoung Cho, Yun Hyung Jeon, Yeong-Gwan BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Certain routine medication could result in post-induction hypotension (PIH), such as angiotensin axis blockades, which are frequently administered as a first-line therapy against hypertension. Remimazolam is reportedly associated with lesser intraoperative hypotension than propofol. This study compared the overall incidence of PIH following remimazolam or propofol administration in patients managed by angiotensin axis blockades. METHODS: This single-blind, parallel-group, randomized control trial was conducted in a tertiary university hospital in South Korea. Patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia were considered for enrollment if the inclusion criteria were met: administration of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, 19 to 65 years old, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification ≤ III, and no involvement in other clinical trials. The primary outcome was the overall incidence of PIH, defined as a mean blood pressure (MBP) < 65 mmHg or decrease by ≥ 30% of the baseline MBP. The time points of measurement were baseline, just before the initial intubation attempt, and 1, 5, 10, and 15 min following intubation. The heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and bispectral index were also recorded. Groups P and R included patients administered propofol and remimazolam, respectively, as an induction agent. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients were analyzed, of the 82 randomized patients. PIH was less frequent in group R than group P (62.5% versus 82.9%; t value 4.27, P = 0.04, adjusted odds ratio = 0.32 [95% confidence interval 0.10–0.99]). The decrease in the MBP from baseline was 9.6 mmHg lesser in group R than in group P before the initial intubation attempt (95% confidence interval 3.3–15.9). A similar trend was observed for systolic and diastolic blood pressures. No severe adverse events were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: Remimazolam results in less frequent PIH than propofol in patients undergoing routine administration of angiotensin axis blockades. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was retrospectively registered on Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Republic of Korea (KCT0007488). Registration date: 30/06/2022. BioMed Central 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10286332/ /pubmed/37349690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02188-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Song, Seung Woo
Kim, Sujin
Park, Ji-Hyoung
Cho, Yun Hyung
Jeon, Yeong-Gwan
Post-induction hypotension with remimazolam versus propofol in patients routinely administered angiotensin axis blockades: a randomized control trial
title Post-induction hypotension with remimazolam versus propofol in patients routinely administered angiotensin axis blockades: a randomized control trial
title_full Post-induction hypotension with remimazolam versus propofol in patients routinely administered angiotensin axis blockades: a randomized control trial
title_fullStr Post-induction hypotension with remimazolam versus propofol in patients routinely administered angiotensin axis blockades: a randomized control trial
title_full_unstemmed Post-induction hypotension with remimazolam versus propofol in patients routinely administered angiotensin axis blockades: a randomized control trial
title_short Post-induction hypotension with remimazolam versus propofol in patients routinely administered angiotensin axis blockades: a randomized control trial
title_sort post-induction hypotension with remimazolam versus propofol in patients routinely administered angiotensin axis blockades: a randomized control trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37349690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02188-9
work_keys_str_mv AT songseungwoo postinductionhypotensionwithremimazolamversuspropofolinpatientsroutinelyadministeredangiotensinaxisblockadesarandomizedcontroltrial
AT kimsujin postinductionhypotensionwithremimazolamversuspropofolinpatientsroutinelyadministeredangiotensinaxisblockadesarandomizedcontroltrial
AT parkjihyoung postinductionhypotensionwithremimazolamversuspropofolinpatientsroutinelyadministeredangiotensinaxisblockadesarandomizedcontroltrial
AT choyunhyung postinductionhypotensionwithremimazolamversuspropofolinpatientsroutinelyadministeredangiotensinaxisblockadesarandomizedcontroltrial
AT jeonyeonggwan postinductionhypotensionwithremimazolamversuspropofolinpatientsroutinelyadministeredangiotensinaxisblockadesarandomizedcontroltrial