Cargando…
Does mechanical loading restore ligament biomechanics after injury? A systematic review of studies using animal models
BACKGROUND: Mechanical loading is purported to restore ligament biomechanics post-injury. But this is difficult to corroborate in clinical research when key ligament tissue properties (e.g. strength, stiffness), cannot be accurately measured. We reviewed experimental animal models, to evaluate if po...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37349749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06653-x |
_version_ | 1785061728474628096 |
---|---|
author | Bleakley, Chris Netterström-Wedin, Fredh |
author_facet | Bleakley, Chris Netterström-Wedin, Fredh |
author_sort | Bleakley, Chris |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mechanical loading is purported to restore ligament biomechanics post-injury. But this is difficult to corroborate in clinical research when key ligament tissue properties (e.g. strength, stiffness), cannot be accurately measured. We reviewed experimental animal models, to evaluate if post-injury loading restores tissue biomechanics more favourably than immobilisation or unloading. Our second objective was to explore if outcomes are moderated by loading parameters (e.g. nature, magnitude, duration, frequency of loading). METHODS: Electronic and supplemental searches were performed in April 2021 and updated in May 2023. We included controlled trials using injured animal ligament models, where at least one group was subjected to a mechanical loading intervention postinjury. There were no restrictions on the dose, time of initiation, intensity, or nature of the load. Animals with concomitant fractures or tendon injuries were excluded. Prespecified primary and secondary outcomes were force/stress at ligament failure, stiffness, laxity/deformation. The Systematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation tool was used to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: There were seven eligible studies; all had a high risk of bias. All studies used surgically induced injury to the medial collateral ligament of the rat or rabbit knee. Three studies recorded large effects in favour of ad libitum loading postinjury (vs. unloading), for force at failure and stiffness at 12-week follow up. However, loaded ligaments had greater laxity at initial recruitment (vs. unloaded) at 6 and 12 weeks postinjury. There were trends from two studies that adding structured exercise intervention (short bouts of daily swimming) to ad libitum activity further enhances ligament behaviour under high loads (force at failure, stiffness). Only one study compared different loading parameters (e.g. type, frequency); reporting that an increase in loading duration (from 5 to 15 min/day) had minimal effect on biomechanical outcomes. CONCLUSION: There is preliminary evidence that post-injury loading results in stronger, stiffer ligament tissue, but has a negative effect on low load extensibility. Findings are preliminary due to high risk of bias in animal models, and the optimal loading dose for healing ligaments remains unclear. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06653-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10286351 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102863512023-06-23 Does mechanical loading restore ligament biomechanics after injury? A systematic review of studies using animal models Bleakley, Chris Netterström-Wedin, Fredh BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Mechanical loading is purported to restore ligament biomechanics post-injury. But this is difficult to corroborate in clinical research when key ligament tissue properties (e.g. strength, stiffness), cannot be accurately measured. We reviewed experimental animal models, to evaluate if post-injury loading restores tissue biomechanics more favourably than immobilisation or unloading. Our second objective was to explore if outcomes are moderated by loading parameters (e.g. nature, magnitude, duration, frequency of loading). METHODS: Electronic and supplemental searches were performed in April 2021 and updated in May 2023. We included controlled trials using injured animal ligament models, where at least one group was subjected to a mechanical loading intervention postinjury. There were no restrictions on the dose, time of initiation, intensity, or nature of the load. Animals with concomitant fractures or tendon injuries were excluded. Prespecified primary and secondary outcomes were force/stress at ligament failure, stiffness, laxity/deformation. The Systematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation tool was used to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: There were seven eligible studies; all had a high risk of bias. All studies used surgically induced injury to the medial collateral ligament of the rat or rabbit knee. Three studies recorded large effects in favour of ad libitum loading postinjury (vs. unloading), for force at failure and stiffness at 12-week follow up. However, loaded ligaments had greater laxity at initial recruitment (vs. unloaded) at 6 and 12 weeks postinjury. There were trends from two studies that adding structured exercise intervention (short bouts of daily swimming) to ad libitum activity further enhances ligament behaviour under high loads (force at failure, stiffness). Only one study compared different loading parameters (e.g. type, frequency); reporting that an increase in loading duration (from 5 to 15 min/day) had minimal effect on biomechanical outcomes. CONCLUSION: There is preliminary evidence that post-injury loading results in stronger, stiffer ligament tissue, but has a negative effect on low load extensibility. Findings are preliminary due to high risk of bias in animal models, and the optimal loading dose for healing ligaments remains unclear. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06653-x. BioMed Central 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10286351/ /pubmed/37349749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06653-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Bleakley, Chris Netterström-Wedin, Fredh Does mechanical loading restore ligament biomechanics after injury? A systematic review of studies using animal models |
title | Does mechanical loading restore ligament biomechanics after injury? A systematic review of studies using animal models |
title_full | Does mechanical loading restore ligament biomechanics after injury? A systematic review of studies using animal models |
title_fullStr | Does mechanical loading restore ligament biomechanics after injury? A systematic review of studies using animal models |
title_full_unstemmed | Does mechanical loading restore ligament biomechanics after injury? A systematic review of studies using animal models |
title_short | Does mechanical loading restore ligament biomechanics after injury? A systematic review of studies using animal models |
title_sort | does mechanical loading restore ligament biomechanics after injury? a systematic review of studies using animal models |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37349749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06653-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bleakleychris doesmechanicalloadingrestoreligamentbiomechanicsafterinjuryasystematicreviewofstudiesusinganimalmodels AT netterstromwedinfredh doesmechanicalloadingrestoreligamentbiomechanicsafterinjuryasystematicreviewofstudiesusinganimalmodels |