Cargando…

Physical therapist perceptions and use of clinical pain mechanism assessment in the musculoskeletal setting: a survey analysis

BACKGROUND: A mechanism-based approach to the evaluation and management of pain has been suggested across disciplines in contemporary research. However, the translation of pain mechanism assessment strategies in research to clinical practice is unclear. This study sought to explore perceptions and u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jayaseelan, Dhinu J., Scalzitti, David A., Courtney, Carol A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37349782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06618-0
_version_ 1785061745575854080
author Jayaseelan, Dhinu J.
Scalzitti, David A.
Courtney, Carol A.
author_facet Jayaseelan, Dhinu J.
Scalzitti, David A.
Courtney, Carol A.
author_sort Jayaseelan, Dhinu J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A mechanism-based approach to the evaluation and management of pain has been suggested across disciplines in contemporary research. However, the translation of pain mechanism assessment strategies in research to clinical practice is unclear. This study sought to explore perceptions and use of clinical pain mechanism assessment by physical therapists managing musculoskeletal pain. METHODS: This was an electronic cross-sectional survey. After initial development, refinement, and piloting for comprehensiveness, comprehensibility and relevance, the survey was disseminated to members of the Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy via email listserv. Data was maintained anonymously using the online database REDCap. Descriptive statistics and Spearman’s correlations for non-parametric data were analyzed for frequencies and associations across variables. RESULTS: In total, 148 respondents completed all aspects of the survey. Respondent age ranged from 26 to 73 years, with a mean (SD) of 43.9 (12.0). Most respondents (70.8%) reported performing clinical pain mechanism assessments at least ‘sometimes’. A majority (80.4%) believed clinical pain mechanism assessments are useful in guiding management strategies while 79.8% reported specifically choosing interventions to alter aberrant pain mechanisms. The most commonly used pain severity, physical examination testing and questionnaires were the numeric pain rating scale, pressure pain thresholds and pain diagrams, respectively. However, the vast majority of instruments to clinically assess pain mechanisms were performed by a small proportion of respondents (< 30%). There were no significant correlations between age, years of experience, highest earned degree, completion of advanced training or specialist certification and testing frequency. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of pain mechanisms involved in the pain experience is becoming common in research. The clinical application of pain mechanism assessment is unclear. Based on the results of this survey, physical therapists in the orthopedic setting believe pain mechanism assessment is useful, but data suggests it is infrequently performed. Additional research to uncover clinician motivation related to pain mechanism assessment is warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06618-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10286424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102864242023-06-23 Physical therapist perceptions and use of clinical pain mechanism assessment in the musculoskeletal setting: a survey analysis Jayaseelan, Dhinu J. Scalzitti, David A. Courtney, Carol A. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: A mechanism-based approach to the evaluation and management of pain has been suggested across disciplines in contemporary research. However, the translation of pain mechanism assessment strategies in research to clinical practice is unclear. This study sought to explore perceptions and use of clinical pain mechanism assessment by physical therapists managing musculoskeletal pain. METHODS: This was an electronic cross-sectional survey. After initial development, refinement, and piloting for comprehensiveness, comprehensibility and relevance, the survey was disseminated to members of the Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy via email listserv. Data was maintained anonymously using the online database REDCap. Descriptive statistics and Spearman’s correlations for non-parametric data were analyzed for frequencies and associations across variables. RESULTS: In total, 148 respondents completed all aspects of the survey. Respondent age ranged from 26 to 73 years, with a mean (SD) of 43.9 (12.0). Most respondents (70.8%) reported performing clinical pain mechanism assessments at least ‘sometimes’. A majority (80.4%) believed clinical pain mechanism assessments are useful in guiding management strategies while 79.8% reported specifically choosing interventions to alter aberrant pain mechanisms. The most commonly used pain severity, physical examination testing and questionnaires were the numeric pain rating scale, pressure pain thresholds and pain diagrams, respectively. However, the vast majority of instruments to clinically assess pain mechanisms were performed by a small proportion of respondents (< 30%). There were no significant correlations between age, years of experience, highest earned degree, completion of advanced training or specialist certification and testing frequency. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of pain mechanisms involved in the pain experience is becoming common in research. The clinical application of pain mechanism assessment is unclear. Based on the results of this survey, physical therapists in the orthopedic setting believe pain mechanism assessment is useful, but data suggests it is infrequently performed. Additional research to uncover clinician motivation related to pain mechanism assessment is warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06618-0. BioMed Central 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10286424/ /pubmed/37349782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06618-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Jayaseelan, Dhinu J.
Scalzitti, David A.
Courtney, Carol A.
Physical therapist perceptions and use of clinical pain mechanism assessment in the musculoskeletal setting: a survey analysis
title Physical therapist perceptions and use of clinical pain mechanism assessment in the musculoskeletal setting: a survey analysis
title_full Physical therapist perceptions and use of clinical pain mechanism assessment in the musculoskeletal setting: a survey analysis
title_fullStr Physical therapist perceptions and use of clinical pain mechanism assessment in the musculoskeletal setting: a survey analysis
title_full_unstemmed Physical therapist perceptions and use of clinical pain mechanism assessment in the musculoskeletal setting: a survey analysis
title_short Physical therapist perceptions and use of clinical pain mechanism assessment in the musculoskeletal setting: a survey analysis
title_sort physical therapist perceptions and use of clinical pain mechanism assessment in the musculoskeletal setting: a survey analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37349782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06618-0
work_keys_str_mv AT jayaseelandhinuj physicaltherapistperceptionsanduseofclinicalpainmechanismassessmentinthemusculoskeletalsettingasurveyanalysis
AT scalzittidavida physicaltherapistperceptionsanduseofclinicalpainmechanismassessmentinthemusculoskeletalsettingasurveyanalysis
AT courtneycarola physicaltherapistperceptionsanduseofclinicalpainmechanismassessmentinthemusculoskeletalsettingasurveyanalysis