Cargando…

Evaluation of endometrioma size effect on ovarian reserve, embryo quality and pregnancy outcome after in vitro fertilization cycle; a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION: Investigation of endometrioma size and its laterality on the quality of the embryo in patients with endometrioma compared to healthy subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective and cross-sectional study, 70 patients with unilateral and bilateral endometrioma were recruited a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zareii, Afsson, Askary, Elham, Ghahramani, Ameneh, Chamanara, Kefayat, Abadi, Alimohammad Keshtvarz Hesam, Afzalzadeh, Azadeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02482-1
_version_ 1785061750546104320
author Zareii, Afsson
Askary, Elham
Ghahramani, Ameneh
Chamanara, Kefayat
Abadi, Alimohammad Keshtvarz Hesam
Afzalzadeh, Azadeh
author_facet Zareii, Afsson
Askary, Elham
Ghahramani, Ameneh
Chamanara, Kefayat
Abadi, Alimohammad Keshtvarz Hesam
Afzalzadeh, Azadeh
author_sort Zareii, Afsson
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Investigation of endometrioma size and its laterality on the quality of the embryo in patients with endometrioma compared to healthy subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective and cross-sectional study, 70 patients with unilateral and bilateral endometrioma were recruited and compared with 70 age-matched infertile patients as the control group in terms of AMH before ovum pick-up, embryo quality as well as pregnancy outcome. Additionally, in the case group, we divided both unilateral (n = 32) and bilateral endometrioma patients (n = 38) into three groups based on the size of endometrioma. (1–3 cm, 3–6 cm, 6–10 cm) RESULTS: There was no difference in terms of age, BMI, parity, and age of menarche between the case and control groups. Moreover, no significant difference was observed in the baseline level of AMH between the case 2.96 ± 2.72 ng/dl (0.21–11.3) and control 2.73 ± 2.39 (0.21–12.8) groups. (P = 0.59) There was also no significant difference concerning AMH level between unilateral 3.58 ± 3.20 ng/dl (0.21–12.8) and bilateral endometrioma 2.45 ± 2.14 (0.21 − 0.20) groups. In terms of the quality and number of embryos, there was no significant difference between the case and control groups. (P = 0.30) Although the AMH level decreased with the increase in endometrioma size, this difference was not statistically significant. (P = 0.07) There was no significant difference in terms of the embryo quality between the groups based on the size of endometrioma. (P = 0.77) In addition, no significant difference was observed between the case and control groups in the terms of birth weight and pregnancy complications, such as premature delivery, cesarean section rate, neonatal respiratory distress, jaundice, as well as hospitalization rate. Head circumference of the newborns was higher in the endometrioma group while their Apgar score was lower in the case compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: The presence of endometrioma by itself does not affect the main result of IVF procedures, including the number and quality of embryos and pregnancy outcome. Thus, IVF and embryo preservation and even pregnancy before surgery seem to be reasonable for endometriotic patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10286444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102864442023-06-23 Evaluation of endometrioma size effect on ovarian reserve, embryo quality and pregnancy outcome after in vitro fertilization cycle; a cross-sectional study Zareii, Afsson Askary, Elham Ghahramani, Ameneh Chamanara, Kefayat Abadi, Alimohammad Keshtvarz Hesam Afzalzadeh, Azadeh BMC Womens Health Research INTRODUCTION: Investigation of endometrioma size and its laterality on the quality of the embryo in patients with endometrioma compared to healthy subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective and cross-sectional study, 70 patients with unilateral and bilateral endometrioma were recruited and compared with 70 age-matched infertile patients as the control group in terms of AMH before ovum pick-up, embryo quality as well as pregnancy outcome. Additionally, in the case group, we divided both unilateral (n = 32) and bilateral endometrioma patients (n = 38) into three groups based on the size of endometrioma. (1–3 cm, 3–6 cm, 6–10 cm) RESULTS: There was no difference in terms of age, BMI, parity, and age of menarche between the case and control groups. Moreover, no significant difference was observed in the baseline level of AMH between the case 2.96 ± 2.72 ng/dl (0.21–11.3) and control 2.73 ± 2.39 (0.21–12.8) groups. (P = 0.59) There was also no significant difference concerning AMH level between unilateral 3.58 ± 3.20 ng/dl (0.21–12.8) and bilateral endometrioma 2.45 ± 2.14 (0.21 − 0.20) groups. In terms of the quality and number of embryos, there was no significant difference between the case and control groups. (P = 0.30) Although the AMH level decreased with the increase in endometrioma size, this difference was not statistically significant. (P = 0.07) There was no significant difference in terms of the embryo quality between the groups based on the size of endometrioma. (P = 0.77) In addition, no significant difference was observed between the case and control groups in the terms of birth weight and pregnancy complications, such as premature delivery, cesarean section rate, neonatal respiratory distress, jaundice, as well as hospitalization rate. Head circumference of the newborns was higher in the endometrioma group while their Apgar score was lower in the case compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: The presence of endometrioma by itself does not affect the main result of IVF procedures, including the number and quality of embryos and pregnancy outcome. Thus, IVF and embryo preservation and even pregnancy before surgery seem to be reasonable for endometriotic patients. BioMed Central 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10286444/ /pubmed/37344833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02482-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zareii, Afsson
Askary, Elham
Ghahramani, Ameneh
Chamanara, Kefayat
Abadi, Alimohammad Keshtvarz Hesam
Afzalzadeh, Azadeh
Evaluation of endometrioma size effect on ovarian reserve, embryo quality and pregnancy outcome after in vitro fertilization cycle; a cross-sectional study
title Evaluation of endometrioma size effect on ovarian reserve, embryo quality and pregnancy outcome after in vitro fertilization cycle; a cross-sectional study
title_full Evaluation of endometrioma size effect on ovarian reserve, embryo quality and pregnancy outcome after in vitro fertilization cycle; a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Evaluation of endometrioma size effect on ovarian reserve, embryo quality and pregnancy outcome after in vitro fertilization cycle; a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of endometrioma size effect on ovarian reserve, embryo quality and pregnancy outcome after in vitro fertilization cycle; a cross-sectional study
title_short Evaluation of endometrioma size effect on ovarian reserve, embryo quality and pregnancy outcome after in vitro fertilization cycle; a cross-sectional study
title_sort evaluation of endometrioma size effect on ovarian reserve, embryo quality and pregnancy outcome after in vitro fertilization cycle; a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02482-1
work_keys_str_mv AT zareiiafsson evaluationofendometriomasizeeffectonovarianreserveembryoqualityandpregnancyoutcomeafterinvitrofertilizationcycleacrosssectionalstudy
AT askaryelham evaluationofendometriomasizeeffectonovarianreserveembryoqualityandpregnancyoutcomeafterinvitrofertilizationcycleacrosssectionalstudy
AT ghahramaniameneh evaluationofendometriomasizeeffectonovarianreserveembryoqualityandpregnancyoutcomeafterinvitrofertilizationcycleacrosssectionalstudy
AT chamanarakefayat evaluationofendometriomasizeeffectonovarianreserveembryoqualityandpregnancyoutcomeafterinvitrofertilizationcycleacrosssectionalstudy
AT abadialimohammadkeshtvarzhesam evaluationofendometriomasizeeffectonovarianreserveembryoqualityandpregnancyoutcomeafterinvitrofertilizationcycleacrosssectionalstudy
AT afzalzadehazadeh evaluationofendometriomasizeeffectonovarianreserveembryoqualityandpregnancyoutcomeafterinvitrofertilizationcycleacrosssectionalstudy