Cargando…
Effectiveness of laparoscopic removal of isolated superficial peritoneal endometriosis for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women (ESPriT2): protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Endometriosis affects 190 million women and those assigned female at birth worldwide. For some, it is associated with debilitating chronic pelvic pain. Diagnosis of endometriosis is often achieved through diagnostic laparoscopy. However, when isolated superficial peritoneal endometriosis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37349849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07386-x |
_version_ | 1785061765061541888 |
---|---|
author | Mackenzie, Scott C. Stephen, Jacqueline Williams, Linda Daniels, Jane Norrie, John Becker, Christian M. Byrne, Dominic Cheong, Ying Clark, T. Justin Cooper, Kevin G. Cox, Emma Doust, Ann M. Fernandez, Priscilla Hawe, Jeremy Holland, Tom Hummelshoj, Lone Jackson, Louise J. King, Kathleen Maheshwari, Abha Martin, Dan C. Sutherland, Lauren Thornton, Jim Vincent, Katy Vyas, Sanjay Horne, Andrew W. Whitaker, Lucy H. R. |
author_facet | Mackenzie, Scott C. Stephen, Jacqueline Williams, Linda Daniels, Jane Norrie, John Becker, Christian M. Byrne, Dominic Cheong, Ying Clark, T. Justin Cooper, Kevin G. Cox, Emma Doust, Ann M. Fernandez, Priscilla Hawe, Jeremy Holland, Tom Hummelshoj, Lone Jackson, Louise J. King, Kathleen Maheshwari, Abha Martin, Dan C. Sutherland, Lauren Thornton, Jim Vincent, Katy Vyas, Sanjay Horne, Andrew W. Whitaker, Lucy H. R. |
author_sort | Mackenzie, Scott C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endometriosis affects 190 million women and those assigned female at birth worldwide. For some, it is associated with debilitating chronic pelvic pain. Diagnosis of endometriosis is often achieved through diagnostic laparoscopy. However, when isolated superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SPE), the most common endometriosis subtype, is identified during laparoscopy, limited evidence exists to support the common decision to surgically remove it via excision or ablation. Improved understanding of the impact of surgical removal of isolated SPE for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women is required. Here, we describe our protocol for a multi-centre trial to determine the effectiveness of surgical removal of isolated SPE for the management of endometriosis-associated pain. METHODS: We plan to undertake a multi-centre participant-blind parallel-group randomised controlled clinical and cost-effectiveness trial with internal pilot. We plan to randomise 400 participants from up to 70 National Health Service Hospitals in the UK. Participants with chronic pelvic pain awaiting diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected endometriosis will be consented by the clinical research team. If isolated SPE is identified at laparoscopy, and deep or ovarian endometriosis is not seen, participants will be randomised intraoperatively (1:1) to surgical removal (by excision or ablation or both, according to surgeons’ preference) versus diagnostic laparoscopy alone. Randomisation with block-stratification will be used. Participants will be given a diagnosis but will not be informed of the procedure they received until 12 months post-randomisation, unless required. Post-operative medical treatment will be according to participants’ preference. Participants will be asked to complete validated pain and quality of life questionnaires at 3, 6 and 12 months after randomisation. Our primary outcome is the pain domain of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30), via a between randomised group comparison of adjusted means at 12 months. Assuming a standard deviation of 22 points around the pain score, 90% power, 5% significance and 20% missing data, 400 participants are required to be randomised to detect an 8-point pain score difference. DISCUSSION: This trial aims to provide high quality evidence of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of surgical removal of isolated SPE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry ISRCTN27244948. Registered 6 April 2021. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10286505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102865052023-06-23 Effectiveness of laparoscopic removal of isolated superficial peritoneal endometriosis for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women (ESPriT2): protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial Mackenzie, Scott C. Stephen, Jacqueline Williams, Linda Daniels, Jane Norrie, John Becker, Christian M. Byrne, Dominic Cheong, Ying Clark, T. Justin Cooper, Kevin G. Cox, Emma Doust, Ann M. Fernandez, Priscilla Hawe, Jeremy Holland, Tom Hummelshoj, Lone Jackson, Louise J. King, Kathleen Maheshwari, Abha Martin, Dan C. Sutherland, Lauren Thornton, Jim Vincent, Katy Vyas, Sanjay Horne, Andrew W. Whitaker, Lucy H. R. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Endometriosis affects 190 million women and those assigned female at birth worldwide. For some, it is associated with debilitating chronic pelvic pain. Diagnosis of endometriosis is often achieved through diagnostic laparoscopy. However, when isolated superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SPE), the most common endometriosis subtype, is identified during laparoscopy, limited evidence exists to support the common decision to surgically remove it via excision or ablation. Improved understanding of the impact of surgical removal of isolated SPE for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women is required. Here, we describe our protocol for a multi-centre trial to determine the effectiveness of surgical removal of isolated SPE for the management of endometriosis-associated pain. METHODS: We plan to undertake a multi-centre participant-blind parallel-group randomised controlled clinical and cost-effectiveness trial with internal pilot. We plan to randomise 400 participants from up to 70 National Health Service Hospitals in the UK. Participants with chronic pelvic pain awaiting diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected endometriosis will be consented by the clinical research team. If isolated SPE is identified at laparoscopy, and deep or ovarian endometriosis is not seen, participants will be randomised intraoperatively (1:1) to surgical removal (by excision or ablation or both, according to surgeons’ preference) versus diagnostic laparoscopy alone. Randomisation with block-stratification will be used. Participants will be given a diagnosis but will not be informed of the procedure they received until 12 months post-randomisation, unless required. Post-operative medical treatment will be according to participants’ preference. Participants will be asked to complete validated pain and quality of life questionnaires at 3, 6 and 12 months after randomisation. Our primary outcome is the pain domain of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30), via a between randomised group comparison of adjusted means at 12 months. Assuming a standard deviation of 22 points around the pain score, 90% power, 5% significance and 20% missing data, 400 participants are required to be randomised to detect an 8-point pain score difference. DISCUSSION: This trial aims to provide high quality evidence of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of surgical removal of isolated SPE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry ISRCTN27244948. Registered 6 April 2021. BioMed Central 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10286505/ /pubmed/37349849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07386-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Mackenzie, Scott C. Stephen, Jacqueline Williams, Linda Daniels, Jane Norrie, John Becker, Christian M. Byrne, Dominic Cheong, Ying Clark, T. Justin Cooper, Kevin G. Cox, Emma Doust, Ann M. Fernandez, Priscilla Hawe, Jeremy Holland, Tom Hummelshoj, Lone Jackson, Louise J. King, Kathleen Maheshwari, Abha Martin, Dan C. Sutherland, Lauren Thornton, Jim Vincent, Katy Vyas, Sanjay Horne, Andrew W. Whitaker, Lucy H. R. Effectiveness of laparoscopic removal of isolated superficial peritoneal endometriosis for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women (ESPriT2): protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
title | Effectiveness of laparoscopic removal of isolated superficial peritoneal endometriosis for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women (ESPriT2): protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Effectiveness of laparoscopic removal of isolated superficial peritoneal endometriosis for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women (ESPriT2): protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of laparoscopic removal of isolated superficial peritoneal endometriosis for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women (ESPriT2): protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of laparoscopic removal of isolated superficial peritoneal endometriosis for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women (ESPriT2): protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Effectiveness of laparoscopic removal of isolated superficial peritoneal endometriosis for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women (ESPriT2): protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of laparoscopic removal of isolated superficial peritoneal endometriosis for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women (esprit2): protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37349849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07386-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mackenziescottc effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT stephenjacqueline effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT williamslinda effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT danielsjane effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT norriejohn effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT beckerchristianm effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT byrnedominic effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cheongying effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT clarktjustin effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cooperkeving effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT coxemma effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT doustannm effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT fernandezpriscilla effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hawejeremy effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hollandtom effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hummelshojlone effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jacksonlouisej effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kingkathleen effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT maheshwariabha effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT martindanc effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sutherlandlauren effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT thorntonjim effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vincentkaty effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vyassanjay effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT horneandreww effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT whitakerlucyhr effectivenessoflaparoscopicremovalofisolatedsuperficialperitonealendometriosisforthemanagementofchronicpelvicpaininwomenesprit2protocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial |