Cargando…

Eye-tracking technology and the dynamics of natural gaze behavior in sports: an update 2016–2022

Updating and complementing a previous review on eye-tracking technology and the dynamics of natural gaze behavior in sports, this short review focuses on the progress concerning researched sports tasks, applied methods of gaze data collection and analysis as well as derived gaze measures for the tim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kredel, Ralf, Hernandez, Julia, Hossner, Ernst-Joachim, Zahno, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359890
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1130051
_version_ 1785061779559153664
author Kredel, Ralf
Hernandez, Julia
Hossner, Ernst-Joachim
Zahno, Stephan
author_facet Kredel, Ralf
Hernandez, Julia
Hossner, Ernst-Joachim
Zahno, Stephan
author_sort Kredel, Ralf
collection PubMed
description Updating and complementing a previous review on eye-tracking technology and the dynamics of natural gaze behavior in sports, this short review focuses on the progress concerning researched sports tasks, applied methods of gaze data collection and analysis as well as derived gaze measures for the time interval of 2016–2022. To that end, a systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines was conducted, searching Web of Science, PubMed Central, SPORTDiscus, and ScienceDirect for the keywords: eye tracking, gaze behavio*r, eye movement, and visual search. Thirty-one studies were identified for the review. On the one hand, a generally increased research interest and a wider area of researched sports with a particular increase in official’s gaze behavior were diagnosed. On the other hand, a general lack of progress concerning sample sizes, amounts of trials, employed eye-tracking technology and gaze analysis procedures must be acknowledged. Nevertheless, first attempts to automated gaze-cue-allocations (GCA) in mobile eye-tracking studies were seen, potentially enhancing objectivity, and alleviating the burden of manual workload inherently associated with conventional gaze analyses. Reinforcing the claims of the previous review, this review concludes by describing four distinct technological approaches to automating GCA, some of which are specifically suited to tackle the validity and generalizability issues associated with the current limitations of mobile eye-tracking studies on natural gaze behavior in sports.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10286576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102865762023-06-23 Eye-tracking technology and the dynamics of natural gaze behavior in sports: an update 2016–2022 Kredel, Ralf Hernandez, Julia Hossner, Ernst-Joachim Zahno, Stephan Front Psychol Psychology Updating and complementing a previous review on eye-tracking technology and the dynamics of natural gaze behavior in sports, this short review focuses on the progress concerning researched sports tasks, applied methods of gaze data collection and analysis as well as derived gaze measures for the time interval of 2016–2022. To that end, a systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines was conducted, searching Web of Science, PubMed Central, SPORTDiscus, and ScienceDirect for the keywords: eye tracking, gaze behavio*r, eye movement, and visual search. Thirty-one studies were identified for the review. On the one hand, a generally increased research interest and a wider area of researched sports with a particular increase in official’s gaze behavior were diagnosed. On the other hand, a general lack of progress concerning sample sizes, amounts of trials, employed eye-tracking technology and gaze analysis procedures must be acknowledged. Nevertheless, first attempts to automated gaze-cue-allocations (GCA) in mobile eye-tracking studies were seen, potentially enhancing objectivity, and alleviating the burden of manual workload inherently associated with conventional gaze analyses. Reinforcing the claims of the previous review, this review concludes by describing four distinct technological approaches to automating GCA, some of which are specifically suited to tackle the validity and generalizability issues associated with the current limitations of mobile eye-tracking studies on natural gaze behavior in sports. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10286576/ /pubmed/37359890 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1130051 Text en Copyright © 2023 Kredel, Hernandez, Hossner and Zahno. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Kredel, Ralf
Hernandez, Julia
Hossner, Ernst-Joachim
Zahno, Stephan
Eye-tracking technology and the dynamics of natural gaze behavior in sports: an update 2016–2022
title Eye-tracking technology and the dynamics of natural gaze behavior in sports: an update 2016–2022
title_full Eye-tracking technology and the dynamics of natural gaze behavior in sports: an update 2016–2022
title_fullStr Eye-tracking technology and the dynamics of natural gaze behavior in sports: an update 2016–2022
title_full_unstemmed Eye-tracking technology and the dynamics of natural gaze behavior in sports: an update 2016–2022
title_short Eye-tracking technology and the dynamics of natural gaze behavior in sports: an update 2016–2022
title_sort eye-tracking technology and the dynamics of natural gaze behavior in sports: an update 2016–2022
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359890
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1130051
work_keys_str_mv AT kredelralf eyetrackingtechnologyandthedynamicsofnaturalgazebehaviorinsportsanupdate20162022
AT hernandezjulia eyetrackingtechnologyandthedynamicsofnaturalgazebehaviorinsportsanupdate20162022
AT hossnerernstjoachim eyetrackingtechnologyandthedynamicsofnaturalgazebehaviorinsportsanupdate20162022
AT zahnostephan eyetrackingtechnologyandthedynamicsofnaturalgazebehaviorinsportsanupdate20162022