Cargando…

Final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: An NRG oncology randomized study

OBJECTIVE. To determine whether a non-platinum chemotherapy doublet improves overall survival (OS) among patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical carcinoma. METHODS. Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 240 is a phase 3, randomized, open-label, clinical trial that studied the efficacy of paclitaxe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tewari, Krishnansu S., Sill, Michael W., Birrer, Michael J., Penson, Richard T., Huang, Helen, Moore, David H., Ramondetta, Lois M., Landrum, Lisa M., Oaknin, Ana, Reid, Thomas J., Leitao, Mario M., Michael, Helen E., Monk, Bradley J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36898292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.010
_version_ 1785061828924014592
author Tewari, Krishnansu S.
Sill, Michael W.
Birrer, Michael J.
Penson, Richard T.
Huang, Helen
Moore, David H.
Ramondetta, Lois M.
Landrum, Lisa M.
Oaknin, Ana
Reid, Thomas J.
Leitao, Mario M.
Michael, Helen E.
Monk, Bradley J.
author_facet Tewari, Krishnansu S.
Sill, Michael W.
Birrer, Michael J.
Penson, Richard T.
Huang, Helen
Moore, David H.
Ramondetta, Lois M.
Landrum, Lisa M.
Oaknin, Ana
Reid, Thomas J.
Leitao, Mario M.
Michael, Helen E.
Monk, Bradley J.
author_sort Tewari, Krishnansu S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE. To determine whether a non-platinum chemotherapy doublet improves overall survival (OS) among patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical carcinoma. METHODS. Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 240 is a phase 3, randomized, open-label, clinical trial that studied the efficacy of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) plus topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2) days 1–3 (n = 223) vs cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) plus paclitaxel 135 or 175 mg/m(2) (n = 229), in 452 patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. Each chemotherapy doublet was also studied with and without bevacizumab (15 mg/kg). Cycles were repeated every 21 days until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or complete response. The primary endpoints were OS and the frequency and severity of adverse effects. We report the final analysis of OS. RESULTS. At the protocol-specified final analysis, median OS was 16.3 (cisplatin-paclitaxel backbone) and 13.8 months (topotecan-paclitaxel backbone) (HR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91–1.38; p = 0.28). Median OS for cisplatin-paclitaxel and topotecan-paclitaxel was 15 vs 12 months, respectively (HR 1.10; 95% CI,0.82–1.48; p = 0.52), and for cisplatin-paclitaxel-bevacizumab and topotecan-paclitaxel-bevacizumab was 17.5 vs 16.2 months, respectively (HR 1.16; 95% CI, 0.86–1.56; p = 0.34). Among the 75% of patients in the study population previously exposed to platinum, median OS was 14.6 (cisplatin-paclitaxel backbone) vs 12.9 months (topotecan-paclitaxel backbone), respectively (HR 1.09; 95% CI, 0.86–1.38;p = 0.48). Post-progression survival was 7.9 (cisplatin-paclitaxel backbone) vs 8.1 months (topotecan-paclitaxel backbone) (HR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.75–1.19). Grade 4 hematologic toxicity was similar between chemotherapy backbones. CONCLUSIONS. Topotecan plus paclitaxel does not confer a survival benefit to women with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer, even among platinum-exposed patients. Topotecan-paclitaxel should not be routinely recommended in this population. NCT00803062.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10286827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102868272023-06-22 Final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: An NRG oncology randomized study Tewari, Krishnansu S. Sill, Michael W. Birrer, Michael J. Penson, Richard T. Huang, Helen Moore, David H. Ramondetta, Lois M. Landrum, Lisa M. Oaknin, Ana Reid, Thomas J. Leitao, Mario M. Michael, Helen E. Monk, Bradley J. Gynecol Oncol Article OBJECTIVE. To determine whether a non-platinum chemotherapy doublet improves overall survival (OS) among patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical carcinoma. METHODS. Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 240 is a phase 3, randomized, open-label, clinical trial that studied the efficacy of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) plus topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2) days 1–3 (n = 223) vs cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) plus paclitaxel 135 or 175 mg/m(2) (n = 229), in 452 patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. Each chemotherapy doublet was also studied with and without bevacizumab (15 mg/kg). Cycles were repeated every 21 days until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or complete response. The primary endpoints were OS and the frequency and severity of adverse effects. We report the final analysis of OS. RESULTS. At the protocol-specified final analysis, median OS was 16.3 (cisplatin-paclitaxel backbone) and 13.8 months (topotecan-paclitaxel backbone) (HR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91–1.38; p = 0.28). Median OS for cisplatin-paclitaxel and topotecan-paclitaxel was 15 vs 12 months, respectively (HR 1.10; 95% CI,0.82–1.48; p = 0.52), and for cisplatin-paclitaxel-bevacizumab and topotecan-paclitaxel-bevacizumab was 17.5 vs 16.2 months, respectively (HR 1.16; 95% CI, 0.86–1.56; p = 0.34). Among the 75% of patients in the study population previously exposed to platinum, median OS was 14.6 (cisplatin-paclitaxel backbone) vs 12.9 months (topotecan-paclitaxel backbone), respectively (HR 1.09; 95% CI, 0.86–1.38;p = 0.48). Post-progression survival was 7.9 (cisplatin-paclitaxel backbone) vs 8.1 months (topotecan-paclitaxel backbone) (HR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.75–1.19). Grade 4 hematologic toxicity was similar between chemotherapy backbones. CONCLUSIONS. Topotecan plus paclitaxel does not confer a survival benefit to women with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer, even among platinum-exposed patients. Topotecan-paclitaxel should not be routinely recommended in this population. NCT00803062. 2023-04 2023-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10286827/ /pubmed/36898292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.010 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Tewari, Krishnansu S.
Sill, Michael W.
Birrer, Michael J.
Penson, Richard T.
Huang, Helen
Moore, David H.
Ramondetta, Lois M.
Landrum, Lisa M.
Oaknin, Ana
Reid, Thomas J.
Leitao, Mario M.
Michael, Helen E.
Monk, Bradley J.
Final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: An NRG oncology randomized study
title Final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: An NRG oncology randomized study
title_full Final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: An NRG oncology randomized study
title_fullStr Final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: An NRG oncology randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: An NRG oncology randomized study
title_short Final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: An NRG oncology randomized study
title_sort final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: an nrg oncology randomized study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36898292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.010
work_keys_str_mv AT tewarikrishnansus finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy
AT sillmichaelw finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy
AT birrermichaelj finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy
AT pensonrichardt finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy
AT huanghelen finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy
AT mooredavidh finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy
AT ramondettaloism finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy
AT landrumlisam finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy
AT oakninana finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy
AT reidthomasj finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy
AT leitaomariom finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy
AT michaelhelene finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy
AT monkbradleyj finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy