Cargando…
Final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: An NRG oncology randomized study
OBJECTIVE. To determine whether a non-platinum chemotherapy doublet improves overall survival (OS) among patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical carcinoma. METHODS. Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 240 is a phase 3, randomized, open-label, clinical trial that studied the efficacy of paclitaxe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36898292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.010 |
_version_ | 1785061828924014592 |
---|---|
author | Tewari, Krishnansu S. Sill, Michael W. Birrer, Michael J. Penson, Richard T. Huang, Helen Moore, David H. Ramondetta, Lois M. Landrum, Lisa M. Oaknin, Ana Reid, Thomas J. Leitao, Mario M. Michael, Helen E. Monk, Bradley J. |
author_facet | Tewari, Krishnansu S. Sill, Michael W. Birrer, Michael J. Penson, Richard T. Huang, Helen Moore, David H. Ramondetta, Lois M. Landrum, Lisa M. Oaknin, Ana Reid, Thomas J. Leitao, Mario M. Michael, Helen E. Monk, Bradley J. |
author_sort | Tewari, Krishnansu S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE. To determine whether a non-platinum chemotherapy doublet improves overall survival (OS) among patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical carcinoma. METHODS. Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 240 is a phase 3, randomized, open-label, clinical trial that studied the efficacy of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) plus topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2) days 1–3 (n = 223) vs cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) plus paclitaxel 135 or 175 mg/m(2) (n = 229), in 452 patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. Each chemotherapy doublet was also studied with and without bevacizumab (15 mg/kg). Cycles were repeated every 21 days until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or complete response. The primary endpoints were OS and the frequency and severity of adverse effects. We report the final analysis of OS. RESULTS. At the protocol-specified final analysis, median OS was 16.3 (cisplatin-paclitaxel backbone) and 13.8 months (topotecan-paclitaxel backbone) (HR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91–1.38; p = 0.28). Median OS for cisplatin-paclitaxel and topotecan-paclitaxel was 15 vs 12 months, respectively (HR 1.10; 95% CI,0.82–1.48; p = 0.52), and for cisplatin-paclitaxel-bevacizumab and topotecan-paclitaxel-bevacizumab was 17.5 vs 16.2 months, respectively (HR 1.16; 95% CI, 0.86–1.56; p = 0.34). Among the 75% of patients in the study population previously exposed to platinum, median OS was 14.6 (cisplatin-paclitaxel backbone) vs 12.9 months (topotecan-paclitaxel backbone), respectively (HR 1.09; 95% CI, 0.86–1.38;p = 0.48). Post-progression survival was 7.9 (cisplatin-paclitaxel backbone) vs 8.1 months (topotecan-paclitaxel backbone) (HR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.75–1.19). Grade 4 hematologic toxicity was similar between chemotherapy backbones. CONCLUSIONS. Topotecan plus paclitaxel does not confer a survival benefit to women with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer, even among platinum-exposed patients. Topotecan-paclitaxel should not be routinely recommended in this population. NCT00803062. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10286827 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102868272023-06-22 Final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: An NRG oncology randomized study Tewari, Krishnansu S. Sill, Michael W. Birrer, Michael J. Penson, Richard T. Huang, Helen Moore, David H. Ramondetta, Lois M. Landrum, Lisa M. Oaknin, Ana Reid, Thomas J. Leitao, Mario M. Michael, Helen E. Monk, Bradley J. Gynecol Oncol Article OBJECTIVE. To determine whether a non-platinum chemotherapy doublet improves overall survival (OS) among patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical carcinoma. METHODS. Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 240 is a phase 3, randomized, open-label, clinical trial that studied the efficacy of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) plus topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2) days 1–3 (n = 223) vs cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) plus paclitaxel 135 or 175 mg/m(2) (n = 229), in 452 patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. Each chemotherapy doublet was also studied with and without bevacizumab (15 mg/kg). Cycles were repeated every 21 days until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or complete response. The primary endpoints were OS and the frequency and severity of adverse effects. We report the final analysis of OS. RESULTS. At the protocol-specified final analysis, median OS was 16.3 (cisplatin-paclitaxel backbone) and 13.8 months (topotecan-paclitaxel backbone) (HR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91–1.38; p = 0.28). Median OS for cisplatin-paclitaxel and topotecan-paclitaxel was 15 vs 12 months, respectively (HR 1.10; 95% CI,0.82–1.48; p = 0.52), and for cisplatin-paclitaxel-bevacizumab and topotecan-paclitaxel-bevacizumab was 17.5 vs 16.2 months, respectively (HR 1.16; 95% CI, 0.86–1.56; p = 0.34). Among the 75% of patients in the study population previously exposed to platinum, median OS was 14.6 (cisplatin-paclitaxel backbone) vs 12.9 months (topotecan-paclitaxel backbone), respectively (HR 1.09; 95% CI, 0.86–1.38;p = 0.48). Post-progression survival was 7.9 (cisplatin-paclitaxel backbone) vs 8.1 months (topotecan-paclitaxel backbone) (HR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.75–1.19). Grade 4 hematologic toxicity was similar between chemotherapy backbones. CONCLUSIONS. Topotecan plus paclitaxel does not confer a survival benefit to women with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer, even among platinum-exposed patients. Topotecan-paclitaxel should not be routinely recommended in this population. NCT00803062. 2023-04 2023-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10286827/ /pubmed/36898292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.010 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Tewari, Krishnansu S. Sill, Michael W. Birrer, Michael J. Penson, Richard T. Huang, Helen Moore, David H. Ramondetta, Lois M. Landrum, Lisa M. Oaknin, Ana Reid, Thomas J. Leitao, Mario M. Michael, Helen E. Monk, Bradley J. Final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: An NRG oncology randomized study |
title | Final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: An NRG oncology randomized study |
title_full | Final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: An NRG oncology randomized study |
title_fullStr | Final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: An NRG oncology randomized study |
title_full_unstemmed | Final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: An NRG oncology randomized study |
title_short | Final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: An NRG oncology randomized study |
title_sort | final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: an nrg oncology randomized study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36898292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tewarikrishnansus finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy AT sillmichaelw finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy AT birrermichaelj finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy AT pensonrichardt finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy AT huanghelen finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy AT mooredavidh finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy AT ramondettaloism finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy AT landrumlisam finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy AT oakninana finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy AT reidthomasj finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy AT leitaomariom finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy AT michaelhelene finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy AT monkbradleyj finalsurvivalanalysisoftopotecanandpaclitaxelforfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedcervicalcancerannrgoncologyrandomizedstudy |