Cargando…

Changes in the quality of life of early breast cancer patients and comparison with the normative Slovenian population

BACKGROUND: We aimed to identify changes in quality of life after breast cancer treatment and compare them with the normative population data for the Slovenian population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, single-group, cohort design was used. A total of 102 early breast cancer patients treated w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grasic Kuhar, Cvetka, Gortnar Cepeda, Tjasa, Kurzeder, Christian, Vetter, Marcus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37341200
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2023-0019
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: We aimed to identify changes in quality of life after breast cancer treatment and compare them with the normative population data for the Slovenian population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, single-group, cohort design was used. A total of 102 early breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana were included. Of those, 71% returned the questionnaires after one-year post-chemotherapy. The Slovenian versions of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 and BR23 questionnaires were used. Primary outcomes were a comparison of global health status/quality of life (GHS) and C30 Summary Score (C30-SumSc) at baseline and one-year post-chemotherapy with the normative Slovenian population. The exploratory analysis evaluated the differences in symptoms and functional scales of QLQ C-30 and QLQ BR-23 between baseline and one-year post-chemotherapy. RESULTS: At baseline and one-year post-chemotherapy, C30-SumSc of patients was lower than the predicted C30-SumSc from the normative Slovenian population by 2.6 points (p = 0.04) and 6.5 points (p < 0.001), resp. On the contrary, GHS was not statistically different from predicted either at baseline or after one year. Exploratory analysis revealed that one-year post-chemotherapy compared to the beginning of chemotherapy, patients had statistically significantly and clinically meaningful lower scores in body image and cognitive functioning, and increased symptom scores for pain, fatigue, and arm symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The C30-SumSc is reduced one-year post-chemotherapy. Early interventions should be directed toward the prevention of the decline of cognitive functioning and body image, and to alleviate fatigue, pain, and arm symptoms.