Cargando…

Oncolytic DNX-2401 virotherapy plus pembrolizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a phase 1/2 trial

Immune-mediated anti-tumoral responses, elicited by oncolytic viruses and augmented with checkpoint inhibition, may be an effective treatment approach for glioblastoma. Here in this multicenter phase 1/2 study we evaluated the combination of intratumoral delivery of oncolytic virus DNX-2401 followed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nassiri, Farshad, Patil, Vikas, Yefet, Leeor S., Singh, Olivia, Liu, Jeff, Dang, Rachel M. A., Yamaguchi, Takafumi N., Daras, Mariza, Cloughesy, Timothy F., Colman, Howard, Kumthekar, Priya U., Chen, Clark C., Aiken, Robert, Groves, Morris D., Ong, Shirley S., Ramakrishna, Rohan, Vogelbaum, Michael A., Khagi, Simon, Kaley, Thomas, Melear, Jason M., Peereboom, David M., Rodriguez, Analiz, Yankelevich, Maxim, Nair, Suresh G., Puduvalli, Vinay K., Aldape, Kenneth, Gao, Andrew, López-Janeiro, Álvaro, de Andrea, Carlos E., Alonso, Marta M., Boutros, Paul, Robbins, Joan, Mason, Warren P., Sonabend, Adam M., Stupp, Roger, Fueyo, Juan, Gomez-Manzano, Candelaria, Lang, Frederick F., Zadeh, Gelareh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10287560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37188783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02347-y
_version_ 1785061900313165824
author Nassiri, Farshad
Patil, Vikas
Yefet, Leeor S.
Singh, Olivia
Liu, Jeff
Dang, Rachel M. A.
Yamaguchi, Takafumi N.
Daras, Mariza
Cloughesy, Timothy F.
Colman, Howard
Kumthekar, Priya U.
Chen, Clark C.
Aiken, Robert
Groves, Morris D.
Ong, Shirley S.
Ramakrishna, Rohan
Vogelbaum, Michael A.
Khagi, Simon
Kaley, Thomas
Melear, Jason M.
Peereboom, David M.
Rodriguez, Analiz
Yankelevich, Maxim
Nair, Suresh G.
Puduvalli, Vinay K.
Aldape, Kenneth
Gao, Andrew
López-Janeiro, Álvaro
de Andrea, Carlos E.
Alonso, Marta M.
Boutros, Paul
Robbins, Joan
Mason, Warren P.
Sonabend, Adam M.
Stupp, Roger
Fueyo, Juan
Gomez-Manzano, Candelaria
Lang, Frederick F.
Zadeh, Gelareh
author_facet Nassiri, Farshad
Patil, Vikas
Yefet, Leeor S.
Singh, Olivia
Liu, Jeff
Dang, Rachel M. A.
Yamaguchi, Takafumi N.
Daras, Mariza
Cloughesy, Timothy F.
Colman, Howard
Kumthekar, Priya U.
Chen, Clark C.
Aiken, Robert
Groves, Morris D.
Ong, Shirley S.
Ramakrishna, Rohan
Vogelbaum, Michael A.
Khagi, Simon
Kaley, Thomas
Melear, Jason M.
Peereboom, David M.
Rodriguez, Analiz
Yankelevich, Maxim
Nair, Suresh G.
Puduvalli, Vinay K.
Aldape, Kenneth
Gao, Andrew
López-Janeiro, Álvaro
de Andrea, Carlos E.
Alonso, Marta M.
Boutros, Paul
Robbins, Joan
Mason, Warren P.
Sonabend, Adam M.
Stupp, Roger
Fueyo, Juan
Gomez-Manzano, Candelaria
Lang, Frederick F.
Zadeh, Gelareh
author_sort Nassiri, Farshad
collection PubMed
description Immune-mediated anti-tumoral responses, elicited by oncolytic viruses and augmented with checkpoint inhibition, may be an effective treatment approach for glioblastoma. Here in this multicenter phase 1/2 study we evaluated the combination of intratumoral delivery of oncolytic virus DNX-2401 followed by intravenous anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab in recurrent glioblastoma, first in a dose-escalation and then in a dose-expansion phase, in 49 patients. The primary endpoints were overall safety and objective response rate. The primary safety endpoint was met, whereas the primary efficacy endpoint was not met. There were no dose-limiting toxicities, and full dose combined treatment was well tolerated. The objective response rate was 10.4% (90% confidence interval (CI) 4.2–20.7%), which was not statistically greater than the prespecified control rate of 5%. The secondary endpoint of overall survival at 12 months was 52.7% (95% CI 40.1–69.2%), which was statistically greater than the prespecified control rate of 20%. Median overall survival was 12.5 months (10.7–13.5 months). Objective responses led to longer survival (hazard ratio 0.20, 95% CI 0.05–0.87). A total of 56.2% (95% CI 41.1–70.5%) of patients had a clinical benefit defined as stable disease or better. Three patients completed treatment with durable responses and remain alive at 45, 48 and 60 months. Exploratory mutational, gene-expression and immunophenotypic analyses revealed that the balance between immune cell infiltration and expression of checkpoint inhibitors may potentially inform on response to treatment and mechanisms of resistance. Overall, the combination of intratumoral DNX-2401 followed by pembrolizumab was safe with notable survival benefit in select patients (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02798406).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10287560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102875602023-06-24 Oncolytic DNX-2401 virotherapy plus pembrolizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a phase 1/2 trial Nassiri, Farshad Patil, Vikas Yefet, Leeor S. Singh, Olivia Liu, Jeff Dang, Rachel M. A. Yamaguchi, Takafumi N. Daras, Mariza Cloughesy, Timothy F. Colman, Howard Kumthekar, Priya U. Chen, Clark C. Aiken, Robert Groves, Morris D. Ong, Shirley S. Ramakrishna, Rohan Vogelbaum, Michael A. Khagi, Simon Kaley, Thomas Melear, Jason M. Peereboom, David M. Rodriguez, Analiz Yankelevich, Maxim Nair, Suresh G. Puduvalli, Vinay K. Aldape, Kenneth Gao, Andrew López-Janeiro, Álvaro de Andrea, Carlos E. Alonso, Marta M. Boutros, Paul Robbins, Joan Mason, Warren P. Sonabend, Adam M. Stupp, Roger Fueyo, Juan Gomez-Manzano, Candelaria Lang, Frederick F. Zadeh, Gelareh Nat Med Article Immune-mediated anti-tumoral responses, elicited by oncolytic viruses and augmented with checkpoint inhibition, may be an effective treatment approach for glioblastoma. Here in this multicenter phase 1/2 study we evaluated the combination of intratumoral delivery of oncolytic virus DNX-2401 followed by intravenous anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab in recurrent glioblastoma, first in a dose-escalation and then in a dose-expansion phase, in 49 patients. The primary endpoints were overall safety and objective response rate. The primary safety endpoint was met, whereas the primary efficacy endpoint was not met. There were no dose-limiting toxicities, and full dose combined treatment was well tolerated. The objective response rate was 10.4% (90% confidence interval (CI) 4.2–20.7%), which was not statistically greater than the prespecified control rate of 5%. The secondary endpoint of overall survival at 12 months was 52.7% (95% CI 40.1–69.2%), which was statistically greater than the prespecified control rate of 20%. Median overall survival was 12.5 months (10.7–13.5 months). Objective responses led to longer survival (hazard ratio 0.20, 95% CI 0.05–0.87). A total of 56.2% (95% CI 41.1–70.5%) of patients had a clinical benefit defined as stable disease or better. Three patients completed treatment with durable responses and remain alive at 45, 48 and 60 months. Exploratory mutational, gene-expression and immunophenotypic analyses revealed that the balance between immune cell infiltration and expression of checkpoint inhibitors may potentially inform on response to treatment and mechanisms of resistance. Overall, the combination of intratumoral DNX-2401 followed by pembrolizumab was safe with notable survival benefit in select patients (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02798406). Nature Publishing Group US 2023-05-15 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10287560/ /pubmed/37188783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02347-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Nassiri, Farshad
Patil, Vikas
Yefet, Leeor S.
Singh, Olivia
Liu, Jeff
Dang, Rachel M. A.
Yamaguchi, Takafumi N.
Daras, Mariza
Cloughesy, Timothy F.
Colman, Howard
Kumthekar, Priya U.
Chen, Clark C.
Aiken, Robert
Groves, Morris D.
Ong, Shirley S.
Ramakrishna, Rohan
Vogelbaum, Michael A.
Khagi, Simon
Kaley, Thomas
Melear, Jason M.
Peereboom, David M.
Rodriguez, Analiz
Yankelevich, Maxim
Nair, Suresh G.
Puduvalli, Vinay K.
Aldape, Kenneth
Gao, Andrew
López-Janeiro, Álvaro
de Andrea, Carlos E.
Alonso, Marta M.
Boutros, Paul
Robbins, Joan
Mason, Warren P.
Sonabend, Adam M.
Stupp, Roger
Fueyo, Juan
Gomez-Manzano, Candelaria
Lang, Frederick F.
Zadeh, Gelareh
Oncolytic DNX-2401 virotherapy plus pembrolizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a phase 1/2 trial
title Oncolytic DNX-2401 virotherapy plus pembrolizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a phase 1/2 trial
title_full Oncolytic DNX-2401 virotherapy plus pembrolizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a phase 1/2 trial
title_fullStr Oncolytic DNX-2401 virotherapy plus pembrolizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a phase 1/2 trial
title_full_unstemmed Oncolytic DNX-2401 virotherapy plus pembrolizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a phase 1/2 trial
title_short Oncolytic DNX-2401 virotherapy plus pembrolizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a phase 1/2 trial
title_sort oncolytic dnx-2401 virotherapy plus pembrolizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a phase 1/2 trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10287560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37188783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02347-y
work_keys_str_mv AT nassirifarshad oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT patilvikas oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT yefetleeors oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT singholivia oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT liujeff oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT dangrachelma oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT yamaguchitakafumin oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT darasmariza oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT cloughesytimothyf oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT colmanhoward oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT kumthekarpriyau oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT chenclarkc oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT aikenrobert oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT grovesmorrisd oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT ongshirleys oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT ramakrishnarohan oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT vogelbaummichaela oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT khagisimon oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT kaleythomas oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT melearjasonm oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT peereboomdavidm oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT rodriguezanaliz oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT yankelevichmaxim oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT nairsureshg oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT puduvallivinayk oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT aldapekenneth oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT gaoandrew oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT lopezjaneiroalvaro oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT deandreacarlose oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT alonsomartam oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT boutrospaul oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT robbinsjoan oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT masonwarrenp oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT sonabendadamm oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT stupproger oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT fueyojuan oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT gomezmanzanocandelaria oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT langfrederickf oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial
AT zadehgelareh oncolyticdnx2401virotherapypluspembrolizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaaphase12trial