Cargando…
Techno-economic assessment of co-production of edible bioplastic and food supplements from Spirulina
Large amount of plastic wastes harming the environment have raised concerns worldwide on finding alternatives to non-biodegradable plastics. Microalgae has been found as a potential source for bioplastic production, besides its more common application in the pharmaceutical and nutraceutical industry...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10287645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37349407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37156-3 |
_version_ | 1785061916426633216 |
---|---|
author | Chalermthai, Bushra Charoensuppanimit, Pongtorn Nootong, Kasidit Olsen, Bradley D. Assabumrungrat, Suttichai |
author_facet | Chalermthai, Bushra Charoensuppanimit, Pongtorn Nootong, Kasidit Olsen, Bradley D. Assabumrungrat, Suttichai |
author_sort | Chalermthai, Bushra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Large amount of plastic wastes harming the environment have raised concerns worldwide on finding alternatives to non-biodegradable plastics. Microalgae has been found as a potential source for bioplastic production, besides its more common application in the pharmaceutical and nutraceutical industry. In this study, the objective was to techno-economically evaluate the large-scale co-production of Spirulina powder as food supplements and edible bioplastic for food packaging. The scale of production was large enough to satisfy 1% of local (Thailand) plastic demand (i.e., approx. 1200 MT y(−1)), and 1% of the global Spirulina demand (approx. 1000 MT y(−1)) as food supplements. Results showed that the co-production of the Spirulina powder and bioplastic revealed an attractive venture with a payback time (PBT) as low as 2.6 y and ROI as high as 38.5%. This was because the revenues generated were as high as US$ 55.6 million y(−1), despite high capital (US$ 55.7 million) and operating (US$ 34.9 million y(−1)) costs. Sensitivity analysis showed differences in the profitability based on variations of major parameters in the study, where the split ratio of biomass used for food supplement versus bioplastic production and the bioplastic’s selling price were found to be the most sensitive. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10287645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102876452023-06-24 Techno-economic assessment of co-production of edible bioplastic and food supplements from Spirulina Chalermthai, Bushra Charoensuppanimit, Pongtorn Nootong, Kasidit Olsen, Bradley D. Assabumrungrat, Suttichai Sci Rep Article Large amount of plastic wastes harming the environment have raised concerns worldwide on finding alternatives to non-biodegradable plastics. Microalgae has been found as a potential source for bioplastic production, besides its more common application in the pharmaceutical and nutraceutical industry. In this study, the objective was to techno-economically evaluate the large-scale co-production of Spirulina powder as food supplements and edible bioplastic for food packaging. The scale of production was large enough to satisfy 1% of local (Thailand) plastic demand (i.e., approx. 1200 MT y(−1)), and 1% of the global Spirulina demand (approx. 1000 MT y(−1)) as food supplements. Results showed that the co-production of the Spirulina powder and bioplastic revealed an attractive venture with a payback time (PBT) as low as 2.6 y and ROI as high as 38.5%. This was because the revenues generated were as high as US$ 55.6 million y(−1), despite high capital (US$ 55.7 million) and operating (US$ 34.9 million y(−1)) costs. Sensitivity analysis showed differences in the profitability based on variations of major parameters in the study, where the split ratio of biomass used for food supplement versus bioplastic production and the bioplastic’s selling price were found to be the most sensitive. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10287645/ /pubmed/37349407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37156-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Chalermthai, Bushra Charoensuppanimit, Pongtorn Nootong, Kasidit Olsen, Bradley D. Assabumrungrat, Suttichai Techno-economic assessment of co-production of edible bioplastic and food supplements from Spirulina |
title | Techno-economic assessment of co-production of edible bioplastic and food supplements from Spirulina |
title_full | Techno-economic assessment of co-production of edible bioplastic and food supplements from Spirulina |
title_fullStr | Techno-economic assessment of co-production of edible bioplastic and food supplements from Spirulina |
title_full_unstemmed | Techno-economic assessment of co-production of edible bioplastic and food supplements from Spirulina |
title_short | Techno-economic assessment of co-production of edible bioplastic and food supplements from Spirulina |
title_sort | techno-economic assessment of co-production of edible bioplastic and food supplements from spirulina |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10287645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37349407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37156-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chalermthaibushra technoeconomicassessmentofcoproductionofediblebioplasticandfoodsupplementsfromspirulina AT charoensuppanimitpongtorn technoeconomicassessmentofcoproductionofediblebioplasticandfoodsupplementsfromspirulina AT nootongkasidit technoeconomicassessmentofcoproductionofediblebioplasticandfoodsupplementsfromspirulina AT olsenbradleyd technoeconomicassessmentofcoproductionofediblebioplasticandfoodsupplementsfromspirulina AT assabumrungratsuttichai technoeconomicassessmentofcoproductionofediblebioplasticandfoodsupplementsfromspirulina |