Cargando…
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ranibizumab Biosimilar for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Japan
INTRODUCTION: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is the world’s leading cause of blindness in elderly people. While anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments are used as the first option for patients with nAMD, they are generally expensive and need repeated injection...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10287869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37171557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00715-y |
_version_ | 1785061961281568768 |
---|---|
author | Yanagi, Yasuo Takahashi, Kanji Iida, Tomohiro Gomi, Fumi Morii, Junko Kunikane, Eriko Sakamoto, Taiji |
author_facet | Yanagi, Yasuo Takahashi, Kanji Iida, Tomohiro Gomi, Fumi Morii, Junko Kunikane, Eriko Sakamoto, Taiji |
author_sort | Yanagi, Yasuo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is the world’s leading cause of blindness in elderly people. While anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments are used as the first option for patients with nAMD, they are generally expensive and need repeated injections. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anti-VEGF therapies, focusing on the newly launched ranibizumab biosimilar (RBZ BS) in patients with nAMD from a Japanese societal perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to simulate the lifetime transitions of a cohort of treatment-naïve patients with nAMD through health states that were based on the involvement of nAMD (single eye vs. both eyes), the treatment status of the patients, and decimal best-corrected visual acuity. The model compared RBZ BS with branded RBZ, aflibercept (AFL), and AFL as loading dose switched to RBZ BS in maintenance in the treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen (RBZ TAE, AFL TAE, and AFL to RBZ BS TAE, respectively), and with branded RBZ in the pro re nata (PRN) regimen, as well as best supportive care (BSC). All processes were validated by five clinical experts. RESULTS: When TAE regimens were compared, RBZ BS was dominant (higher quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and lower total cost) to AFL TAE and AFL to RBZ BS TAE. The result was robust regardless of whether the clinical data were taken from the direct head-to-head clinical trial or from indirect treatment comparison. RBZ BS TAE was cost-saving compared to RBZ TAE. RBZ BS TAE was estimated to be dominant to BSC owing to a lower societal cost. Like TAE regimens, RBZ BS was cost-saving compared to RBZ PRN and was dominant to BSC in PRN regimens. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that RBZ BS is dominant to other anti-VEGF treatments in patients with nAMD in both TAE and PRN regimens and BSC from a Japanese societal perspective. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-023-00715-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10287869 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102878692023-06-24 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ranibizumab Biosimilar for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Japan Yanagi, Yasuo Takahashi, Kanji Iida, Tomohiro Gomi, Fumi Morii, Junko Kunikane, Eriko Sakamoto, Taiji Ophthalmol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is the world’s leading cause of blindness in elderly people. While anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments are used as the first option for patients with nAMD, they are generally expensive and need repeated injections. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anti-VEGF therapies, focusing on the newly launched ranibizumab biosimilar (RBZ BS) in patients with nAMD from a Japanese societal perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to simulate the lifetime transitions of a cohort of treatment-naïve patients with nAMD through health states that were based on the involvement of nAMD (single eye vs. both eyes), the treatment status of the patients, and decimal best-corrected visual acuity. The model compared RBZ BS with branded RBZ, aflibercept (AFL), and AFL as loading dose switched to RBZ BS in maintenance in the treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen (RBZ TAE, AFL TAE, and AFL to RBZ BS TAE, respectively), and with branded RBZ in the pro re nata (PRN) regimen, as well as best supportive care (BSC). All processes were validated by five clinical experts. RESULTS: When TAE regimens were compared, RBZ BS was dominant (higher quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and lower total cost) to AFL TAE and AFL to RBZ BS TAE. The result was robust regardless of whether the clinical data were taken from the direct head-to-head clinical trial or from indirect treatment comparison. RBZ BS TAE was cost-saving compared to RBZ TAE. RBZ BS TAE was estimated to be dominant to BSC owing to a lower societal cost. Like TAE regimens, RBZ BS was cost-saving compared to RBZ PRN and was dominant to BSC in PRN regimens. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that RBZ BS is dominant to other anti-VEGF treatments in patients with nAMD in both TAE and PRN regimens and BSC from a Japanese societal perspective. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-023-00715-y. Springer Healthcare 2023-05-12 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10287869/ /pubmed/37171557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00715-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Yanagi, Yasuo Takahashi, Kanji Iida, Tomohiro Gomi, Fumi Morii, Junko Kunikane, Eriko Sakamoto, Taiji Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ranibizumab Biosimilar for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Japan |
title | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ranibizumab Biosimilar for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Japan |
title_full | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ranibizumab Biosimilar for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Japan |
title_fullStr | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ranibizumab Biosimilar for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Japan |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ranibizumab Biosimilar for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Japan |
title_short | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ranibizumab Biosimilar for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Japan |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of ranibizumab biosimilar for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in japan |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10287869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37171557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00715-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanagiyasuo costeffectivenessanalysisofranibizumabbiosimilarforneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationinjapan AT takahashikanji costeffectivenessanalysisofranibizumabbiosimilarforneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationinjapan AT iidatomohiro costeffectivenessanalysisofranibizumabbiosimilarforneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationinjapan AT gomifumi costeffectivenessanalysisofranibizumabbiosimilarforneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationinjapan AT moriijunko costeffectivenessanalysisofranibizumabbiosimilarforneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationinjapan AT kunikaneeriko costeffectivenessanalysisofranibizumabbiosimilarforneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationinjapan AT sakamototaiji costeffectivenessanalysisofranibizumabbiosimilarforneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationinjapan |