Cargando…

Protocol for a prospective study evaluating circulating tumour cells status to predict radical prostatectomy treatment failure in localised prostate cancer patients (C-ProMeta-1)

BACKGROUND: Treatment decisions in prostate cancer (PCa) rely on disease stratification between localised and metastatic stages, but current imaging staging technologies are not sensitive to micro-metastatic disease. Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) status is a promising tool in this regard. The Pars...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Hammouri, Tarek, Almeida-Magana, Ricardo, Lawrence, Rachel, Duffy, Tom, White, Laura, Burke, Edwina, Kudahetti, Sakunthala, Collins, Justin, Rajan, Prabhakar, Berney, Daniel, Gabe, Rhian, Shaw, Greg, Lu, Yong-Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10288675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37353740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11081-0
_version_ 1785062119149928448
author Al-Hammouri, Tarek
Almeida-Magana, Ricardo
Lawrence, Rachel
Duffy, Tom
White, Laura
Burke, Edwina
Kudahetti, Sakunthala
Collins, Justin
Rajan, Prabhakar
Berney, Daniel
Gabe, Rhian
Shaw, Greg
Lu, Yong-Jie
author_facet Al-Hammouri, Tarek
Almeida-Magana, Ricardo
Lawrence, Rachel
Duffy, Tom
White, Laura
Burke, Edwina
Kudahetti, Sakunthala
Collins, Justin
Rajan, Prabhakar
Berney, Daniel
Gabe, Rhian
Shaw, Greg
Lu, Yong-Jie
author_sort Al-Hammouri, Tarek
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment decisions in prostate cancer (PCa) rely on disease stratification between localised and metastatic stages, but current imaging staging technologies are not sensitive to micro-metastatic disease. Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) status is a promising tool in this regard. The Parsortix® CTC isolation system employs an epitope-independent approach based on cell size and deformability to increase the capture rate of CTCs. Here, we present a protocol for prospective evaluation of this method to predict post radical prostatectomy (RP) PCa cancer recurrence. METHODS: We plan to recruit 294 patients diagnosed with unfavourable intermediate, to high and very high-risk localised PCa. Exclusion criteria include synchronous cancer diagnosis or prior PCa treatment, including hormone therapy. RP is performed according to the standard of care. Two blood samples (20 ml) are collected before and again 3-months after RP. The clinical team are blinded to CTC results and the laboratory researchers are blinded to clinical information. Treatment failure is defined as a PSA ≥ 0.2 mg/ml, start of salvage treatment or imaging-proven metastatic lesions. The CTC analysis entails enumeration and RNA analysis of gene expression in captured CTCs. The primary outcome is the accuracy of CTC status to predict post-RP treatment failure at 4.5 years. Observed sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values will be reported. Specificity will be presented over time. DISCUSSION: CTC status may reflect the true potential for PCa metastasis and may predict clinical outcomes better than the current PCa progression risk grading systems. Therefore establishing a robust biomarker for predicting treatment failure in localized high-risk PCa would significantly enhance guidance in treatment decision-making, optimizing cure rates while minimizing unnecessary harm from overtreatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN17332543.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10288675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102886752023-06-24 Protocol for a prospective study evaluating circulating tumour cells status to predict radical prostatectomy treatment failure in localised prostate cancer patients (C-ProMeta-1) Al-Hammouri, Tarek Almeida-Magana, Ricardo Lawrence, Rachel Duffy, Tom White, Laura Burke, Edwina Kudahetti, Sakunthala Collins, Justin Rajan, Prabhakar Berney, Daniel Gabe, Rhian Shaw, Greg Lu, Yong-Jie BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Treatment decisions in prostate cancer (PCa) rely on disease stratification between localised and metastatic stages, but current imaging staging technologies are not sensitive to micro-metastatic disease. Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) status is a promising tool in this regard. The Parsortix® CTC isolation system employs an epitope-independent approach based on cell size and deformability to increase the capture rate of CTCs. Here, we present a protocol for prospective evaluation of this method to predict post radical prostatectomy (RP) PCa cancer recurrence. METHODS: We plan to recruit 294 patients diagnosed with unfavourable intermediate, to high and very high-risk localised PCa. Exclusion criteria include synchronous cancer diagnosis or prior PCa treatment, including hormone therapy. RP is performed according to the standard of care. Two blood samples (20 ml) are collected before and again 3-months after RP. The clinical team are blinded to CTC results and the laboratory researchers are blinded to clinical information. Treatment failure is defined as a PSA ≥ 0.2 mg/ml, start of salvage treatment or imaging-proven metastatic lesions. The CTC analysis entails enumeration and RNA analysis of gene expression in captured CTCs. The primary outcome is the accuracy of CTC status to predict post-RP treatment failure at 4.5 years. Observed sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values will be reported. Specificity will be presented over time. DISCUSSION: CTC status may reflect the true potential for PCa metastasis and may predict clinical outcomes better than the current PCa progression risk grading systems. Therefore establishing a robust biomarker for predicting treatment failure in localized high-risk PCa would significantly enhance guidance in treatment decision-making, optimizing cure rates while minimizing unnecessary harm from overtreatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN17332543. BioMed Central 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10288675/ /pubmed/37353740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11081-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Al-Hammouri, Tarek
Almeida-Magana, Ricardo
Lawrence, Rachel
Duffy, Tom
White, Laura
Burke, Edwina
Kudahetti, Sakunthala
Collins, Justin
Rajan, Prabhakar
Berney, Daniel
Gabe, Rhian
Shaw, Greg
Lu, Yong-Jie
Protocol for a prospective study evaluating circulating tumour cells status to predict radical prostatectomy treatment failure in localised prostate cancer patients (C-ProMeta-1)
title Protocol for a prospective study evaluating circulating tumour cells status to predict radical prostatectomy treatment failure in localised prostate cancer patients (C-ProMeta-1)
title_full Protocol for a prospective study evaluating circulating tumour cells status to predict radical prostatectomy treatment failure in localised prostate cancer patients (C-ProMeta-1)
title_fullStr Protocol for a prospective study evaluating circulating tumour cells status to predict radical prostatectomy treatment failure in localised prostate cancer patients (C-ProMeta-1)
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for a prospective study evaluating circulating tumour cells status to predict radical prostatectomy treatment failure in localised prostate cancer patients (C-ProMeta-1)
title_short Protocol for a prospective study evaluating circulating tumour cells status to predict radical prostatectomy treatment failure in localised prostate cancer patients (C-ProMeta-1)
title_sort protocol for a prospective study evaluating circulating tumour cells status to predict radical prostatectomy treatment failure in localised prostate cancer patients (c-prometa-1)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10288675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37353740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11081-0
work_keys_str_mv AT alhammouritarek protocolforaprospectivestudyevaluatingcirculatingtumourcellsstatustopredictradicalprostatectomytreatmentfailureinlocalisedprostatecancerpatientscprometa1
AT almeidamaganaricardo protocolforaprospectivestudyevaluatingcirculatingtumourcellsstatustopredictradicalprostatectomytreatmentfailureinlocalisedprostatecancerpatientscprometa1
AT lawrencerachel protocolforaprospectivestudyevaluatingcirculatingtumourcellsstatustopredictradicalprostatectomytreatmentfailureinlocalisedprostatecancerpatientscprometa1
AT duffytom protocolforaprospectivestudyevaluatingcirculatingtumourcellsstatustopredictradicalprostatectomytreatmentfailureinlocalisedprostatecancerpatientscprometa1
AT whitelaura protocolforaprospectivestudyevaluatingcirculatingtumourcellsstatustopredictradicalprostatectomytreatmentfailureinlocalisedprostatecancerpatientscprometa1
AT burkeedwina protocolforaprospectivestudyevaluatingcirculatingtumourcellsstatustopredictradicalprostatectomytreatmentfailureinlocalisedprostatecancerpatientscprometa1
AT kudahettisakunthala protocolforaprospectivestudyevaluatingcirculatingtumourcellsstatustopredictradicalprostatectomytreatmentfailureinlocalisedprostatecancerpatientscprometa1
AT collinsjustin protocolforaprospectivestudyevaluatingcirculatingtumourcellsstatustopredictradicalprostatectomytreatmentfailureinlocalisedprostatecancerpatientscprometa1
AT rajanprabhakar protocolforaprospectivestudyevaluatingcirculatingtumourcellsstatustopredictradicalprostatectomytreatmentfailureinlocalisedprostatecancerpatientscprometa1
AT berneydaniel protocolforaprospectivestudyevaluatingcirculatingtumourcellsstatustopredictradicalprostatectomytreatmentfailureinlocalisedprostatecancerpatientscprometa1
AT gaberhian protocolforaprospectivestudyevaluatingcirculatingtumourcellsstatustopredictradicalprostatectomytreatmentfailureinlocalisedprostatecancerpatientscprometa1
AT shawgreg protocolforaprospectivestudyevaluatingcirculatingtumourcellsstatustopredictradicalprostatectomytreatmentfailureinlocalisedprostatecancerpatientscprometa1
AT luyongjie protocolforaprospectivestudyevaluatingcirculatingtumourcellsstatustopredictradicalprostatectomytreatmentfailureinlocalisedprostatecancerpatientscprometa1