Cargando…

Long-Term Evaluation of a Course on Evidence-Based Public Health in the U.S. and Europe

The evidence-based public health course equips public health professionals with skills and tools for applying evidence-based frameworks and processes in public health practice. To date, training has included participants from all the 50 U.S. states, 2 U.S. territories, and multiple other countries b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacob, Rebekah R., Brownson, Carol A., Deshpande, Anjali D., Eyler, Amy A., Gillespie, Kathleen N., Hefelfinger, Jennie, Erwin, Paul C., Macchi, Marti, Brownson, Ross C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10288838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34020850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2021.03.003
_version_ 1785062156800098304
author Jacob, Rebekah R.
Brownson, Carol A.
Deshpande, Anjali D.
Eyler, Amy A.
Gillespie, Kathleen N.
Hefelfinger, Jennie
Erwin, Paul C.
Macchi, Marti
Brownson, Ross C.
author_facet Jacob, Rebekah R.
Brownson, Carol A.
Deshpande, Anjali D.
Eyler, Amy A.
Gillespie, Kathleen N.
Hefelfinger, Jennie
Erwin, Paul C.
Macchi, Marti
Brownson, Ross C.
author_sort Jacob, Rebekah R.
collection PubMed
description The evidence-based public health course equips public health professionals with skills and tools for applying evidence-based frameworks and processes in public health practice. To date, training has included participants from all the 50 U.S. states, 2 U.S. territories, and multiple other countries besides the U.S. This study pooled follow-up efforts (5 surveys, with 723 course participants, 2005–2019) to explore the benefits, application, and barriers to applying the evidence-based public health course content. All analyses were completed in 2020. The most common benefits (reported by >80% of all participants) were identifying ways to apply knowledge in their work, acquiring new knowledge, and becoming a better leader who promotes evidence-based approaches. Participants most frequently applied course content to searching the scientific literature (72.9%) and least frequently to writing grants (42.7%). Lack of funds for continued training (35.3%), not having enough time to implement evidence-based public health approaches (33.8%), and not having coworkers trained in evidence-based public health (33.1%) were common barriers to applying the content from the course. Mean scores were calculated for benefits, application, and barriers to explore subgroup differences. European participants generally reported higher benefits from the course (mean difference=0.12, 95% CI=0.00, 0.23) and higher frequency of application of the course content to their job (mean difference=0.17, 95% CI=0.06, 0.28) than U.S. participants. Participants from later cohorts (2012–2019) reported more overall barriers to applying course content in their work (mean difference=0.15, 95% CI=0.05, 0.24). The evidence-based public health course represents an important strategy for increasing the capacity (individual skills) for evidence-based processes within public health practice. Organization-level methods are also needed to scale up and sustain capacity-building efforts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10288838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102888382023-06-23 Long-Term Evaluation of a Course on Evidence-Based Public Health in the U.S. and Europe Jacob, Rebekah R. Brownson, Carol A. Deshpande, Anjali D. Eyler, Amy A. Gillespie, Kathleen N. Hefelfinger, Jennie Erwin, Paul C. Macchi, Marti Brownson, Ross C. Am J Prev Med Article The evidence-based public health course equips public health professionals with skills and tools for applying evidence-based frameworks and processes in public health practice. To date, training has included participants from all the 50 U.S. states, 2 U.S. territories, and multiple other countries besides the U.S. This study pooled follow-up efforts (5 surveys, with 723 course participants, 2005–2019) to explore the benefits, application, and barriers to applying the evidence-based public health course content. All analyses were completed in 2020. The most common benefits (reported by >80% of all participants) were identifying ways to apply knowledge in their work, acquiring new knowledge, and becoming a better leader who promotes evidence-based approaches. Participants most frequently applied course content to searching the scientific literature (72.9%) and least frequently to writing grants (42.7%). Lack of funds for continued training (35.3%), not having enough time to implement evidence-based public health approaches (33.8%), and not having coworkers trained in evidence-based public health (33.1%) were common barriers to applying the content from the course. Mean scores were calculated for benefits, application, and barriers to explore subgroup differences. European participants generally reported higher benefits from the course (mean difference=0.12, 95% CI=0.00, 0.23) and higher frequency of application of the course content to their job (mean difference=0.17, 95% CI=0.06, 0.28) than U.S. participants. Participants from later cohorts (2012–2019) reported more overall barriers to applying course content in their work (mean difference=0.15, 95% CI=0.05, 0.24). The evidence-based public health course represents an important strategy for increasing the capacity (individual skills) for evidence-based processes within public health practice. Organization-level methods are also needed to scale up and sustain capacity-building efforts. 2021-08 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10288838/ /pubmed/34020850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2021.03.003 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Jacob, Rebekah R.
Brownson, Carol A.
Deshpande, Anjali D.
Eyler, Amy A.
Gillespie, Kathleen N.
Hefelfinger, Jennie
Erwin, Paul C.
Macchi, Marti
Brownson, Ross C.
Long-Term Evaluation of a Course on Evidence-Based Public Health in the U.S. and Europe
title Long-Term Evaluation of a Course on Evidence-Based Public Health in the U.S. and Europe
title_full Long-Term Evaluation of a Course on Evidence-Based Public Health in the U.S. and Europe
title_fullStr Long-Term Evaluation of a Course on Evidence-Based Public Health in the U.S. and Europe
title_full_unstemmed Long-Term Evaluation of a Course on Evidence-Based Public Health in the U.S. and Europe
title_short Long-Term Evaluation of a Course on Evidence-Based Public Health in the U.S. and Europe
title_sort long-term evaluation of a course on evidence-based public health in the u.s. and europe
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10288838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34020850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2021.03.003
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobrebekahr longtermevaluationofacourseonevidencebasedpublichealthintheusandeurope
AT brownsoncarola longtermevaluationofacourseonevidencebasedpublichealthintheusandeurope
AT deshpandeanjalid longtermevaluationofacourseonevidencebasedpublichealthintheusandeurope
AT eyleramya longtermevaluationofacourseonevidencebasedpublichealthintheusandeurope
AT gillespiekathleenn longtermevaluationofacourseonevidencebasedpublichealthintheusandeurope
AT hefelfingerjennie longtermevaluationofacourseonevidencebasedpublichealthintheusandeurope
AT erwinpaulc longtermevaluationofacourseonevidencebasedpublichealthintheusandeurope
AT macchimarti longtermevaluationofacourseonevidencebasedpublichealthintheusandeurope
AT brownsonrossc longtermevaluationofacourseonevidencebasedpublichealthintheusandeurope