Cargando…
Does open reduction internal fixation using a volar locking plate and closed reduction percutaneous pinning using K wires provide similar functional and radiological outcomes for unstable distal radius fractures?
Background: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are a common orthopedic injury, with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) being the two most frequently used methods for treating unstable DRFs. The optimal treatment approach for DRFs is still a matter of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
EDP Sciences
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10288971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37350673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2023015 |
_version_ | 1785062183650983936 |
---|---|
author | Radaideh, Ahmad Abualadas, Jehad Anaqreh, Yazan Alnemer, Adham Alghzawi, Ahmad Abdalmajeed Abualadas, Rawan Alawneh, Mohammad Essa, Suhaib Bani |
author_facet | Radaideh, Ahmad Abualadas, Jehad Anaqreh, Yazan Alnemer, Adham Alghzawi, Ahmad Abdalmajeed Abualadas, Rawan Alawneh, Mohammad Essa, Suhaib Bani |
author_sort | Radaideh, Ahmad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are a common orthopedic injury, with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) being the two most frequently used methods for treating unstable DRFs. The optimal treatment approach for DRFs is still a matter of debate. Therefore, this retrospective analysis aimed to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of ORIF and CRPP to determine the most effective approach for treating unstable DRFs. Material and Methods: A total of 89 patients were included in this retrospective study; 34 underwent CRPP and 55 underwent ORIF (61 males and 28 females, mean age: 35.5). Radiographic measurements of radial inclination, radial height, and volar tilt, as well as patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) scores for pain and function, were used to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes during the final follow-up period, ranging from 1 to 4 years. Results: There were significant improvements in the radiographic measurements for both groups, indicating a good reduction. However, the two fixation methods had no significant difference in radiographic measurements during the entire follow-up period. Regarding PRWE scores, there was a significant difference between the two groups, with patients in the CRPP group reporting better wrist function and less pain. Conclusions: Both CRPP and ORIF are effective methods for treating unstable DRFs. Achieving an acceptable reduction did not correlate with better pain management, function, or the ability to carry out day-to-day activities. However, patients treated with CRPP had better wrist function and less pain during follow-up. Radiographic measurements did not differ significantly between the two groups. Clinicians should consider closed-reduction percutaneous pinning as a viable and effective treatment option for distal radius fractures, particularly when optimal wrist function and pain management are important considerations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10288971 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | EDP Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102889712023-06-24 Does open reduction internal fixation using a volar locking plate and closed reduction percutaneous pinning using K wires provide similar functional and radiological outcomes for unstable distal radius fractures? Radaideh, Ahmad Abualadas, Jehad Anaqreh, Yazan Alnemer, Adham Alghzawi, Ahmad Abdalmajeed Abualadas, Rawan Alawneh, Mohammad Essa, Suhaib Bani SICOT J Original Article Background: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are a common orthopedic injury, with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) being the two most frequently used methods for treating unstable DRFs. The optimal treatment approach for DRFs is still a matter of debate. Therefore, this retrospective analysis aimed to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of ORIF and CRPP to determine the most effective approach for treating unstable DRFs. Material and Methods: A total of 89 patients were included in this retrospective study; 34 underwent CRPP and 55 underwent ORIF (61 males and 28 females, mean age: 35.5). Radiographic measurements of radial inclination, radial height, and volar tilt, as well as patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) scores for pain and function, were used to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes during the final follow-up period, ranging from 1 to 4 years. Results: There were significant improvements in the radiographic measurements for both groups, indicating a good reduction. However, the two fixation methods had no significant difference in radiographic measurements during the entire follow-up period. Regarding PRWE scores, there was a significant difference between the two groups, with patients in the CRPP group reporting better wrist function and less pain. Conclusions: Both CRPP and ORIF are effective methods for treating unstable DRFs. Achieving an acceptable reduction did not correlate with better pain management, function, or the ability to carry out day-to-day activities. However, patients treated with CRPP had better wrist function and less pain during follow-up. Radiographic measurements did not differ significantly between the two groups. Clinicians should consider closed-reduction percutaneous pinning as a viable and effective treatment option for distal radius fractures, particularly when optimal wrist function and pain management are important considerations. EDP Sciences 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10288971/ /pubmed/37350673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2023015 Text en © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Radaideh, Ahmad Abualadas, Jehad Anaqreh, Yazan Alnemer, Adham Alghzawi, Ahmad Abdalmajeed Abualadas, Rawan Alawneh, Mohammad Essa, Suhaib Bani Does open reduction internal fixation using a volar locking plate and closed reduction percutaneous pinning using K wires provide similar functional and radiological outcomes for unstable distal radius fractures? |
title | Does open reduction internal fixation using a volar locking plate and closed reduction percutaneous pinning using K wires provide similar functional and radiological outcomes for unstable distal radius fractures? |
title_full | Does open reduction internal fixation using a volar locking plate and closed reduction percutaneous pinning using K wires provide similar functional and radiological outcomes for unstable distal radius fractures? |
title_fullStr | Does open reduction internal fixation using a volar locking plate and closed reduction percutaneous pinning using K wires provide similar functional and radiological outcomes for unstable distal radius fractures? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does open reduction internal fixation using a volar locking plate and closed reduction percutaneous pinning using K wires provide similar functional and radiological outcomes for unstable distal radius fractures? |
title_short | Does open reduction internal fixation using a volar locking plate and closed reduction percutaneous pinning using K wires provide similar functional and radiological outcomes for unstable distal radius fractures? |
title_sort | does open reduction internal fixation using a volar locking plate and closed reduction percutaneous pinning using k wires provide similar functional and radiological outcomes for unstable distal radius fractures? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10288971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37350673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2023015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT radaidehahmad doesopenreductioninternalfixationusingavolarlockingplateandclosedreductionpercutaneouspinningusingkwiresprovidesimilarfunctionalandradiologicaloutcomesforunstabledistalradiusfractures AT abualadasjehad doesopenreductioninternalfixationusingavolarlockingplateandclosedreductionpercutaneouspinningusingkwiresprovidesimilarfunctionalandradiologicaloutcomesforunstabledistalradiusfractures AT anaqrehyazan doesopenreductioninternalfixationusingavolarlockingplateandclosedreductionpercutaneouspinningusingkwiresprovidesimilarfunctionalandradiologicaloutcomesforunstabledistalradiusfractures AT alnemeradham doesopenreductioninternalfixationusingavolarlockingplateandclosedreductionpercutaneouspinningusingkwiresprovidesimilarfunctionalandradiologicaloutcomesforunstabledistalradiusfractures AT alghzawiahmadabdalmajeed doesopenreductioninternalfixationusingavolarlockingplateandclosedreductionpercutaneouspinningusingkwiresprovidesimilarfunctionalandradiologicaloutcomesforunstabledistalradiusfractures AT abualadasrawan doesopenreductioninternalfixationusingavolarlockingplateandclosedreductionpercutaneouspinningusingkwiresprovidesimilarfunctionalandradiologicaloutcomesforunstabledistalradiusfractures AT alawnehmohammad doesopenreductioninternalfixationusingavolarlockingplateandclosedreductionpercutaneouspinningusingkwiresprovidesimilarfunctionalandradiologicaloutcomesforunstabledistalradiusfractures AT essasuhaibbani doesopenreductioninternalfixationusingavolarlockingplateandclosedreductionpercutaneouspinningusingkwiresprovidesimilarfunctionalandradiologicaloutcomesforunstabledistalradiusfractures |