Cargando…
Accuracy of 23 Equations for Estimating LDL Cholesterol in a Clinical Laboratory Database of 5,051,467 Patients
BACKGROUND: Alternatives to the Friedewald low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) equation have been proposed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of available LDL-C equations with ultracentrifugation measurement. METHODS: We used the second harvest of the Very Large Database of Lipids (VLDbL),...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10289049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37361322 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/gh.1214 |
_version_ | 1785062201260769280 |
---|---|
author | Samuel, Christeen Park, Jihwan Sajja, Aparna Michos, Erin D. Blumenthal, Roger S. Jones, Steven R. Martin, Seth S. |
author_facet | Samuel, Christeen Park, Jihwan Sajja, Aparna Michos, Erin D. Blumenthal, Roger S. Jones, Steven R. Martin, Seth S. |
author_sort | Samuel, Christeen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Alternatives to the Friedewald low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) equation have been proposed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of available LDL-C equations with ultracentrifugation measurement. METHODS: We used the second harvest of the Very Large Database of Lipids (VLDbL), which is a population-representative convenience sample of adult and pediatric patients (N = 5,051,467) with clinical lipid measurements obtained via the vertical auto profile (VAP) ultracentrifugation method between October 1, 2015 and June 30, 2019. We performed a systematic literature review to identify available LDL-C equations and compared their accuracy according to guideline-based classification. We also compared the equations by their median error versus ultracentrifugation. We evaluated LDL-C equations overall and stratified by age, sex, fasting status, and triglyceride levels, as well as in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, kidney disease, inflammation, and thyroid dysfunction. RESULTS: Analyzing 23 identified LDL-C equations in 5,051,467 patients (mean±SD age, 56±16 years; 53.3% women), the Martin/Hopkins equation most accurately classified LDL-C to the correct category (89.6%), followed by the Sampson (86.3%), Chen (84.4%), Puavilai (84.1%), Delong (83.3%), and Friedewald (83.2%) equations. The other 17 equations were less accurate than Friedewald, with accuracy as low as 35.1%. The median error of equations ranged from –10.8 to 18.7 mg/dL, and was best optimized using the Martin/Hopkins equation (0.3, IQR–1.6 to 2.4 mg/dL). The Martin/Hopkins equation had the highest accuracy after stratifying by age, sex, fasting status, triglyceride levels, and clinical subgroups. In addition, one in five patients who had Friedewald LDL-C <70 mg/dL, and almost half of the patients with Friedewald LDL-C <70 mg/dL and triglyceride levels 150–399 mg/dL, had LDL-C correctly reclassified to >70 mg/dL by the Martin/Hopkins equation. CONCLUSIONS: Most proposed alternatives to the Friedewald equation worsen LDL-C accuracy, and their use could introduce unintended disparities in clinical care. The Martin/Hopkins equation demonstrated the highest LDL-C accuracy overall and across subgroups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10289049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102890492023-06-24 Accuracy of 23 Equations for Estimating LDL Cholesterol in a Clinical Laboratory Database of 5,051,467 Patients Samuel, Christeen Park, Jihwan Sajja, Aparna Michos, Erin D. Blumenthal, Roger S. Jones, Steven R. Martin, Seth S. Glob Heart Original Research BACKGROUND: Alternatives to the Friedewald low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) equation have been proposed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of available LDL-C equations with ultracentrifugation measurement. METHODS: We used the second harvest of the Very Large Database of Lipids (VLDbL), which is a population-representative convenience sample of adult and pediatric patients (N = 5,051,467) with clinical lipid measurements obtained via the vertical auto profile (VAP) ultracentrifugation method between October 1, 2015 and June 30, 2019. We performed a systematic literature review to identify available LDL-C equations and compared their accuracy according to guideline-based classification. We also compared the equations by their median error versus ultracentrifugation. We evaluated LDL-C equations overall and stratified by age, sex, fasting status, and triglyceride levels, as well as in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, kidney disease, inflammation, and thyroid dysfunction. RESULTS: Analyzing 23 identified LDL-C equations in 5,051,467 patients (mean±SD age, 56±16 years; 53.3% women), the Martin/Hopkins equation most accurately classified LDL-C to the correct category (89.6%), followed by the Sampson (86.3%), Chen (84.4%), Puavilai (84.1%), Delong (83.3%), and Friedewald (83.2%) equations. The other 17 equations were less accurate than Friedewald, with accuracy as low as 35.1%. The median error of equations ranged from –10.8 to 18.7 mg/dL, and was best optimized using the Martin/Hopkins equation (0.3, IQR–1.6 to 2.4 mg/dL). The Martin/Hopkins equation had the highest accuracy after stratifying by age, sex, fasting status, triglyceride levels, and clinical subgroups. In addition, one in five patients who had Friedewald LDL-C <70 mg/dL, and almost half of the patients with Friedewald LDL-C <70 mg/dL and triglyceride levels 150–399 mg/dL, had LDL-C correctly reclassified to >70 mg/dL by the Martin/Hopkins equation. CONCLUSIONS: Most proposed alternatives to the Friedewald equation worsen LDL-C accuracy, and their use could introduce unintended disparities in clinical care. The Martin/Hopkins equation demonstrated the highest LDL-C accuracy overall and across subgroups. Ubiquity Press 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10289049/ /pubmed/37361322 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/gh.1214 Text en Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Samuel, Christeen Park, Jihwan Sajja, Aparna Michos, Erin D. Blumenthal, Roger S. Jones, Steven R. Martin, Seth S. Accuracy of 23 Equations for Estimating LDL Cholesterol in a Clinical Laboratory Database of 5,051,467 Patients |
title | Accuracy of 23 Equations for Estimating LDL Cholesterol in a Clinical Laboratory Database of 5,051,467 Patients |
title_full | Accuracy of 23 Equations for Estimating LDL Cholesterol in a Clinical Laboratory Database of 5,051,467 Patients |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of 23 Equations for Estimating LDL Cholesterol in a Clinical Laboratory Database of 5,051,467 Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of 23 Equations for Estimating LDL Cholesterol in a Clinical Laboratory Database of 5,051,467 Patients |
title_short | Accuracy of 23 Equations for Estimating LDL Cholesterol in a Clinical Laboratory Database of 5,051,467 Patients |
title_sort | accuracy of 23 equations for estimating ldl cholesterol in a clinical laboratory database of 5,051,467 patients |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10289049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37361322 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/gh.1214 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT samuelchristeen accuracyof23equationsforestimatingldlcholesterolinaclinicallaboratorydatabaseof5051467patients AT parkjihwan accuracyof23equationsforestimatingldlcholesterolinaclinicallaboratorydatabaseof5051467patients AT sajjaaparna accuracyof23equationsforestimatingldlcholesterolinaclinicallaboratorydatabaseof5051467patients AT michoserind accuracyof23equationsforestimatingldlcholesterolinaclinicallaboratorydatabaseof5051467patients AT blumenthalrogers accuracyof23equationsforestimatingldlcholesterolinaclinicallaboratorydatabaseof5051467patients AT jonesstevenr accuracyof23equationsforestimatingldlcholesterolinaclinicallaboratorydatabaseof5051467patients AT martinseths accuracyof23equationsforestimatingldlcholesterolinaclinicallaboratorydatabaseof5051467patients |