Cargando…
Evaluation of the rubella surveillance system in South Africa, 2016–2018: A cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Rubella is a leading vaccine-preventable cause of birth defects. We conducted this study to evaluate the rubella surveillance system in South Africa from 2016 to 2018. The rubella surveillance system had not been evaluated since its inception; therefore, a formal evaluation is necessary...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10289429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37352228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287170 |
_version_ | 1785062276396482560 |
---|---|
author | Gavhi, Fhatuwani De Voux, Alex Kuonza, Lazarus Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen |
author_facet | Gavhi, Fhatuwani De Voux, Alex Kuonza, Lazarus Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen |
author_sort | Gavhi, Fhatuwani |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rubella is a leading vaccine-preventable cause of birth defects. We conducted this study to evaluate the rubella surveillance system in South Africa from 2016 to 2018. The rubella surveillance system had not been evaluated since its inception; therefore, a formal evaluation is necessary to assess key attributes and to ascertain the extent to which the system achieves its objectives. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the usefulness, simplicity, positive predictive value, timeliness, and data quality of the rubella surveillance system from 2016 to 2018. We reviewed retrospective rubella surveillance data and conducted a survey with key stakeholders of the system. We compiled a summary report from the survey and calculated the annualized detection rate of rubella and non-rubella febrile rash, positive predictive value, the proportion of complete records, and timeliness between the surveillance steps. We compared our results with recommended performance indicators from the 2015 revised World Health Organization African regional guidelines for measles and rubella surveillance. RESULTS: The rubella surveillance system was useful but weak in terms of simplicity. The annualized detection rate of rubella febrile rash was 1.5 per 100,000 populations in 2016, 4.4 in 2017, and 2.1 in 2018. The positive predictive value was 29.1% in 2016, 40.9% in 2017, and 32.9% in 2018. The system did not meet the timeliness goal in the health facility component but met this goal in the laboratory component. The system had poor data quality, particularly in the health facility component. CONCLUSIONS: The rubella surveillance system was useful, although it was not simple to use and had low PPV, poor timeliness, and poor data quality. Efforts should be made to improve the system’s simplicity, PPV, timeliness, and data quality at the facility level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10289429 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102894292023-06-24 Evaluation of the rubella surveillance system in South Africa, 2016–2018: A cross-sectional study Gavhi, Fhatuwani De Voux, Alex Kuonza, Lazarus Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Rubella is a leading vaccine-preventable cause of birth defects. We conducted this study to evaluate the rubella surveillance system in South Africa from 2016 to 2018. The rubella surveillance system had not been evaluated since its inception; therefore, a formal evaluation is necessary to assess key attributes and to ascertain the extent to which the system achieves its objectives. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the usefulness, simplicity, positive predictive value, timeliness, and data quality of the rubella surveillance system from 2016 to 2018. We reviewed retrospective rubella surveillance data and conducted a survey with key stakeholders of the system. We compiled a summary report from the survey and calculated the annualized detection rate of rubella and non-rubella febrile rash, positive predictive value, the proportion of complete records, and timeliness between the surveillance steps. We compared our results with recommended performance indicators from the 2015 revised World Health Organization African regional guidelines for measles and rubella surveillance. RESULTS: The rubella surveillance system was useful but weak in terms of simplicity. The annualized detection rate of rubella febrile rash was 1.5 per 100,000 populations in 2016, 4.4 in 2017, and 2.1 in 2018. The positive predictive value was 29.1% in 2016, 40.9% in 2017, and 32.9% in 2018. The system did not meet the timeliness goal in the health facility component but met this goal in the laboratory component. The system had poor data quality, particularly in the health facility component. CONCLUSIONS: The rubella surveillance system was useful, although it was not simple to use and had low PPV, poor timeliness, and poor data quality. Efforts should be made to improve the system’s simplicity, PPV, timeliness, and data quality at the facility level. Public Library of Science 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10289429/ /pubmed/37352228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287170 Text en © 2023 Gavhi et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gavhi, Fhatuwani De Voux, Alex Kuonza, Lazarus Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen Evaluation of the rubella surveillance system in South Africa, 2016–2018: A cross-sectional study |
title | Evaluation of the rubella surveillance system in South Africa, 2016–2018: A cross-sectional study |
title_full | Evaluation of the rubella surveillance system in South Africa, 2016–2018: A cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the rubella surveillance system in South Africa, 2016–2018: A cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the rubella surveillance system in South Africa, 2016–2018: A cross-sectional study |
title_short | Evaluation of the rubella surveillance system in South Africa, 2016–2018: A cross-sectional study |
title_sort | evaluation of the rubella surveillance system in south africa, 2016–2018: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10289429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37352228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gavhifhatuwani evaluationoftherubellasurveillancesysteminsouthafrica20162018acrosssectionalstudy AT devouxalex evaluationoftherubellasurveillancesysteminsouthafrica20162018acrosssectionalstudy AT kuonzalazarus evaluationoftherubellasurveillancesysteminsouthafrica20162018acrosssectionalstudy AT motazenkengafacvillyen evaluationoftherubellasurveillancesysteminsouthafrica20162018acrosssectionalstudy |