Cargando…

Differences in treatment and outcomes among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with and without standard modifiable risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

There are limited data available on outcomes and pathophysiology behind ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in populations without standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs). The authors carried out this meta-analysis to understand the differences in treatment and outcomes of STEMI pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shrestha, Biraj, Shrestha, Dhan B., Sedhai, Yub R., Shtembari, Jurgen, Oli, Prakash R., Shikhrakar, Shreeja, Paudel, Bidhya, Roberts, Madhur, Patel, Nimesh K., Singh, Aniruddha, Singh, Karan, Waheed, Irfan, Basnyat, Soney, Khan, Mohammad S., Kazimuddin, Mohammed, Elgendy, Islam Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10289527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000000738
_version_ 1785062299209302016
author Shrestha, Biraj
Shrestha, Dhan B.
Sedhai, Yub R.
Shtembari, Jurgen
Oli, Prakash R.
Shikhrakar, Shreeja
Paudel, Bidhya
Roberts, Madhur
Patel, Nimesh K.
Singh, Aniruddha
Singh, Karan
Waheed, Irfan
Basnyat, Soney
Khan, Mohammad S.
Kazimuddin, Mohammed
Elgendy, Islam Y.
author_facet Shrestha, Biraj
Shrestha, Dhan B.
Sedhai, Yub R.
Shtembari, Jurgen
Oli, Prakash R.
Shikhrakar, Shreeja
Paudel, Bidhya
Roberts, Madhur
Patel, Nimesh K.
Singh, Aniruddha
Singh, Karan
Waheed, Irfan
Basnyat, Soney
Khan, Mohammad S.
Kazimuddin, Mohammed
Elgendy, Islam Y.
author_sort Shrestha, Biraj
collection PubMed
description There are limited data available on outcomes and pathophysiology behind ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in populations without standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs). The authors carried out this meta-analysis to understand the differences in treatment and outcomes of STEMI patients with and without SMuRFs. METHODS: A systematic database search was performed for relevant studies. Studies reporting desired outcomes among STEMI patients with and without SMuRFs were selected based on predefined criteria in the study protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42022341389). Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts using Covidence. Full texts of the selected studies were independently reviewed to confirm eligibility. Data were extracted from all eligible studies via a full-text review of the primary article for qualitative and quantitative analysis. In-hospital mortality following the first episode of STEMI was the primary outcome, with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), repeat myocardial infarction (MI), cardiogenic shock, heart failure, and stroke as secondary outcomes of interest. Odds ratio (OR) with a 95% CI was used to estimate the effect. RESULTS: A total of 2135 studies were identified from database search, six studies with 521 150 patients with the first STEMI episode were included in the analysis. The authors found higher in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.43; CI: 1.40–1.47) and cardiogenic shock (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.55–1.63) in the SMuRF-less group with no differences in MACE, recurrent MI, major bleeding, heart failure, and stroke. There were lower prescriptions of statin (OR: 0.62; CI: 0.42–0.91) and Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor /Angiotensin II receptor blocker (OR: 0.49; CI: 0.28–0.87) at discharge in SMuRF-less patients. There was no difference in procedures like coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, and thrombolysis. CONCLUSION: In the SMuRF-less STEMI patients, higher in-hospital mortality and treatment discrepancies were noted at discharge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10289527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102895272023-06-24 Differences in treatment and outcomes among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with and without standard modifiable risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis Shrestha, Biraj Shrestha, Dhan B. Sedhai, Yub R. Shtembari, Jurgen Oli, Prakash R. Shikhrakar, Shreeja Paudel, Bidhya Roberts, Madhur Patel, Nimesh K. Singh, Aniruddha Singh, Karan Waheed, Irfan Basnyat, Soney Khan, Mohammad S. Kazimuddin, Mohammed Elgendy, Islam Y. Ann Med Surg (Lond) Review Articles There are limited data available on outcomes and pathophysiology behind ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in populations without standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs). The authors carried out this meta-analysis to understand the differences in treatment and outcomes of STEMI patients with and without SMuRFs. METHODS: A systematic database search was performed for relevant studies. Studies reporting desired outcomes among STEMI patients with and without SMuRFs were selected based on predefined criteria in the study protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42022341389). Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts using Covidence. Full texts of the selected studies were independently reviewed to confirm eligibility. Data were extracted from all eligible studies via a full-text review of the primary article for qualitative and quantitative analysis. In-hospital mortality following the first episode of STEMI was the primary outcome, with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), repeat myocardial infarction (MI), cardiogenic shock, heart failure, and stroke as secondary outcomes of interest. Odds ratio (OR) with a 95% CI was used to estimate the effect. RESULTS: A total of 2135 studies were identified from database search, six studies with 521 150 patients with the first STEMI episode were included in the analysis. The authors found higher in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.43; CI: 1.40–1.47) and cardiogenic shock (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.55–1.63) in the SMuRF-less group with no differences in MACE, recurrent MI, major bleeding, heart failure, and stroke. There were lower prescriptions of statin (OR: 0.62; CI: 0.42–0.91) and Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor /Angiotensin II receptor blocker (OR: 0.49; CI: 0.28–0.87) at discharge in SMuRF-less patients. There was no difference in procedures like coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, and thrombolysis. CONCLUSION: In the SMuRF-less STEMI patients, higher in-hospital mortality and treatment discrepancies were noted at discharge. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10289527/ /pubmed/37363488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000000738 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Review Articles
Shrestha, Biraj
Shrestha, Dhan B.
Sedhai, Yub R.
Shtembari, Jurgen
Oli, Prakash R.
Shikhrakar, Shreeja
Paudel, Bidhya
Roberts, Madhur
Patel, Nimesh K.
Singh, Aniruddha
Singh, Karan
Waheed, Irfan
Basnyat, Soney
Khan, Mohammad S.
Kazimuddin, Mohammed
Elgendy, Islam Y.
Differences in treatment and outcomes among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with and without standard modifiable risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Differences in treatment and outcomes among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with and without standard modifiable risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Differences in treatment and outcomes among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with and without standard modifiable risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Differences in treatment and outcomes among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with and without standard modifiable risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Differences in treatment and outcomes among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with and without standard modifiable risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Differences in treatment and outcomes among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with and without standard modifiable risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort differences in treatment and outcomes among patients with st-segment elevation myocardial infarction with and without standard modifiable risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10289527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000000738
work_keys_str_mv AT shresthabiraj differencesintreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithandwithoutstandardmodifiableriskfactorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shresthadhanb differencesintreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithandwithoutstandardmodifiableriskfactorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sedhaiyubr differencesintreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithandwithoutstandardmodifiableriskfactorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shtembarijurgen differencesintreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithandwithoutstandardmodifiableriskfactorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT oliprakashr differencesintreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithandwithoutstandardmodifiableriskfactorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shikhrakarshreeja differencesintreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithandwithoutstandardmodifiableriskfactorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT paudelbidhya differencesintreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithandwithoutstandardmodifiableriskfactorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT robertsmadhur differencesintreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithandwithoutstandardmodifiableriskfactorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT patelnimeshk differencesintreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithandwithoutstandardmodifiableriskfactorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT singhaniruddha differencesintreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithandwithoutstandardmodifiableriskfactorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT singhkaran differencesintreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithandwithoutstandardmodifiableriskfactorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT waheedirfan differencesintreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithandwithoutstandardmodifiableriskfactorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT basnyatsoney differencesintreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithandwithoutstandardmodifiableriskfactorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT khanmohammads differencesintreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithandwithoutstandardmodifiableriskfactorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kazimuddinmohammed differencesintreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithandwithoutstandardmodifiableriskfactorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT elgendyislamy differencesintreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithandwithoutstandardmodifiableriskfactorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis