Cargando…

Comparison of spirometric parameters in athletes engaged in aerobic and anaerobic sports: a cross-sectional study

Pulmonary function tests are better among athletes than non-athletes. The spirometry parameters may vary among athletes involved in aerobic and anaerobic sports. This study aims to study the difference in spirometry parameters among aerobic and anaerobic sports athletes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajaure, Yesha Shree, Thapa, Bikalp, Budhathoki, Lee, Rana, Shavana RL, Khadka, Manoj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10289598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000000729
_version_ 1785062315546116096
author Rajaure, Yesha Shree
Thapa, Bikalp
Budhathoki, Lee
Rana, Shavana RL
Khadka, Manoj
author_facet Rajaure, Yesha Shree
Thapa, Bikalp
Budhathoki, Lee
Rana, Shavana RL
Khadka, Manoj
author_sort Rajaure, Yesha Shree
collection PubMed
description Pulmonary function tests are better among athletes than non-athletes. The spirometry parameters may vary among athletes involved in aerobic and anaerobic sports. This study aims to study the difference in spirometry parameters among aerobic and anaerobic sports athletes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 131 professional athletes. A convenience sampling technique was used. The data were collected from April to November 2022 using a proforma form, entered into Microsoft Excel, and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 16. RESULTS: Out of 131 total participants, 65 were involved in aerobic sports, while 66 were in anaerobic sports. The mean age of the participants was 27.34±5 years, the majority being male (n=104). Aerobic athletes had higher differences in forced vital capacity (1.19%, P=0.726) and forced expiratory volume in the first second (3.08%, P=0.315), the difference was not statistically significant. Statistically significantly higher difference in forced expiratory flow at 25–75% (13.42%, P=0.001), forced expiratory flow at 0.2–1.2 l/s (7.47%, P=0.035), and maximum voluntary ventilation (8.58%, P=0.023) values were observed among aerobic athletes. CONCLUSION: Aerobic and anaerobic athletes had no statistically significant difference in forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in the first second; however, other spirometry parameters were comparatively better in aerobic athletes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10289598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102895982023-06-24 Comparison of spirometric parameters in athletes engaged in aerobic and anaerobic sports: a cross-sectional study Rajaure, Yesha Shree Thapa, Bikalp Budhathoki, Lee Rana, Shavana RL Khadka, Manoj Ann Med Surg (Lond) Original Research Pulmonary function tests are better among athletes than non-athletes. The spirometry parameters may vary among athletes involved in aerobic and anaerobic sports. This study aims to study the difference in spirometry parameters among aerobic and anaerobic sports athletes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 131 professional athletes. A convenience sampling technique was used. The data were collected from April to November 2022 using a proforma form, entered into Microsoft Excel, and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 16. RESULTS: Out of 131 total participants, 65 were involved in aerobic sports, while 66 were in anaerobic sports. The mean age of the participants was 27.34±5 years, the majority being male (n=104). Aerobic athletes had higher differences in forced vital capacity (1.19%, P=0.726) and forced expiratory volume in the first second (3.08%, P=0.315), the difference was not statistically significant. Statistically significantly higher difference in forced expiratory flow at 25–75% (13.42%, P=0.001), forced expiratory flow at 0.2–1.2 l/s (7.47%, P=0.035), and maximum voluntary ventilation (8.58%, P=0.023) values were observed among aerobic athletes. CONCLUSION: Aerobic and anaerobic athletes had no statistically significant difference in forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in the first second; however, other spirometry parameters were comparatively better in aerobic athletes. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10289598/ /pubmed/37363603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000000729 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Research
Rajaure, Yesha Shree
Thapa, Bikalp
Budhathoki, Lee
Rana, Shavana RL
Khadka, Manoj
Comparison of spirometric parameters in athletes engaged in aerobic and anaerobic sports: a cross-sectional study
title Comparison of spirometric parameters in athletes engaged in aerobic and anaerobic sports: a cross-sectional study
title_full Comparison of spirometric parameters in athletes engaged in aerobic and anaerobic sports: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Comparison of spirometric parameters in athletes engaged in aerobic and anaerobic sports: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of spirometric parameters in athletes engaged in aerobic and anaerobic sports: a cross-sectional study
title_short Comparison of spirometric parameters in athletes engaged in aerobic and anaerobic sports: a cross-sectional study
title_sort comparison of spirometric parameters in athletes engaged in aerobic and anaerobic sports: a cross-sectional study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10289598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000000729
work_keys_str_mv AT rajaureyeshashree comparisonofspirometricparametersinathletesengagedinaerobicandanaerobicsportsacrosssectionalstudy
AT thapabikalp comparisonofspirometricparametersinathletesengagedinaerobicandanaerobicsportsacrosssectionalstudy
AT budhathokilee comparisonofspirometricparametersinathletesengagedinaerobicandanaerobicsportsacrosssectionalstudy
AT ranashavanarl comparisonofspirometricparametersinathletesengagedinaerobicandanaerobicsportsacrosssectionalstudy
AT khadkamanoj comparisonofspirometricparametersinathletesengagedinaerobicandanaerobicsportsacrosssectionalstudy