Cargando…

Long Biliopancreatic Limb Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the gold standard in bariatric surgery. The one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) procedure, first introduced by Dr. Rutledge, has demonstrated a 25% greater weight loss efficiency than the traditional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedure due to th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salman, Mohamed AbdAlla, Abelsalam, Ahmed, Nashed, George Abdelfady, Yacoub, Mohamed, Abdalla, Ahmed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10289940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37178225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06631-1
_version_ 1785062386918490112
author Salman, Mohamed AbdAlla
Abelsalam, Ahmed
Nashed, George Abdelfady
Yacoub, Mohamed
Abdalla, Ahmed
author_facet Salman, Mohamed AbdAlla
Abelsalam, Ahmed
Nashed, George Abdelfady
Yacoub, Mohamed
Abdalla, Ahmed
author_sort Salman, Mohamed AbdAlla
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the gold standard in bariatric surgery. The one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) procedure, first introduced by Dr. Rutledge, has demonstrated a 25% greater weight loss efficiency than the traditional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedure due to the substantially longer biliopancreatic limb (BPL). AIM OF THE STUDY: The current work aimed to compare the outcomes of OAGB and long BPL RYGB regarding weight loss and comorbidity resolution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was done at our institution between September 2019 and January 2021. Patients who were candidates for bariatric surgery were randomly and equally allocated to two groups. Group A underwent OAGB, while group B underwent long BPL RYGB. Patients were followed up for 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: This study included 62 patients equally allocated to OAGB or long BPL RYGB, with no dropouts during follow-up. At 6 months, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding postoperative BMI (P = 0.313) and the EBWL (P = 0.238). There was comparable remission of diabetes mellitus (P = 0.708), hypertension (P = 0.999), OSA (P = 0.999), joint pain (P = 0.999), and low back pain (P = 0.999). Seven patients in the OAGB group experienced reflux symptoms (P = 0.011), which were managed by proton pump inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Extending the BPL in RYGB provides weight loss and comorbidity remission comparable to that of OAGB. Some OAGB-related reflux cases remain a concern. However, they were sufficiently controlled with PPIs. Due to OAGB superior technical simplicity, long BPL RYGB should be preserved for cases whom are more risky for bile reflux. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10289940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102899402023-06-25 Long Biliopancreatic Limb Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Randomized Controlled Study Salman, Mohamed AbdAlla Abelsalam, Ahmed Nashed, George Abdelfady Yacoub, Mohamed Abdalla, Ahmed Obes Surg Original Contributions BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the gold standard in bariatric surgery. The one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) procedure, first introduced by Dr. Rutledge, has demonstrated a 25% greater weight loss efficiency than the traditional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedure due to the substantially longer biliopancreatic limb (BPL). AIM OF THE STUDY: The current work aimed to compare the outcomes of OAGB and long BPL RYGB regarding weight loss and comorbidity resolution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was done at our institution between September 2019 and January 2021. Patients who were candidates for bariatric surgery were randomly and equally allocated to two groups. Group A underwent OAGB, while group B underwent long BPL RYGB. Patients were followed up for 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: This study included 62 patients equally allocated to OAGB or long BPL RYGB, with no dropouts during follow-up. At 6 months, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding postoperative BMI (P = 0.313) and the EBWL (P = 0.238). There was comparable remission of diabetes mellitus (P = 0.708), hypertension (P = 0.999), OSA (P = 0.999), joint pain (P = 0.999), and low back pain (P = 0.999). Seven patients in the OAGB group experienced reflux symptoms (P = 0.011), which were managed by proton pump inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Extending the BPL in RYGB provides weight loss and comorbidity remission comparable to that of OAGB. Some OAGB-related reflux cases remain a concern. However, they were sufficiently controlled with PPIs. Due to OAGB superior technical simplicity, long BPL RYGB should be preserved for cases whom are more risky for bile reflux. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer US 2023-05-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10289940/ /pubmed/37178225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06631-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Salman, Mohamed AbdAlla
Abelsalam, Ahmed
Nashed, George Abdelfady
Yacoub, Mohamed
Abdalla, Ahmed
Long Biliopancreatic Limb Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Randomized Controlled Study
title Long Biliopancreatic Limb Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Randomized Controlled Study
title_full Long Biliopancreatic Limb Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Randomized Controlled Study
title_fullStr Long Biliopancreatic Limb Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Randomized Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed Long Biliopancreatic Limb Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Randomized Controlled Study
title_short Long Biliopancreatic Limb Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Randomized Controlled Study
title_sort long biliopancreatic limb roux-en-y gastric bypass versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a randomized controlled study
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10289940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37178225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06631-1
work_keys_str_mv AT salmanmohamedabdalla longbiliopancreaticlimbrouxenygastricbypassversusoneanastomosisgastricbypassarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT abelsalamahmed longbiliopancreaticlimbrouxenygastricbypassversusoneanastomosisgastricbypassarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT nashedgeorgeabdelfady longbiliopancreaticlimbrouxenygastricbypassversusoneanastomosisgastricbypassarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT yacoubmohamed longbiliopancreaticlimbrouxenygastricbypassversusoneanastomosisgastricbypassarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT abdallaahmed longbiliopancreaticlimbrouxenygastricbypassversusoneanastomosisgastricbypassarandomizedcontrolledstudy