Cargando…

A comparison in women with newly diagnosed diabetes between those with and without a history of gestational diabetes: a new perspective

AIMS: Previous gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) entails increased risk of future diabetes. We describe the characteristics of women with previous GDM and compare with no previous GDM from the cohort Diabetes in Kalmar and Kronoberg (DKK) of 1248 adults, 40% women, with new diabetes, and factors a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stogianni, Anna, Melin, Eva, Dereke, Jonathan, Rööst, Mattias, Hillman, Magnus, Landin-Olsson, Mona, Wanby, Pär, Thunander, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10289942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37119303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00592-023-02096-x
_version_ 1785062387380912128
author Stogianni, Anna
Melin, Eva
Dereke, Jonathan
Rööst, Mattias
Hillman, Magnus
Landin-Olsson, Mona
Wanby, Pär
Thunander, Maria
author_facet Stogianni, Anna
Melin, Eva
Dereke, Jonathan
Rööst, Mattias
Hillman, Magnus
Landin-Olsson, Mona
Wanby, Pär
Thunander, Maria
author_sort Stogianni, Anna
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Previous gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) entails increased risk of future diabetes. We describe the characteristics of women with previous GDM and compare with no previous GDM from the cohort Diabetes in Kalmar and Kronoberg (DKK) of 1248 adults, 40% women, with new diabetes, and factors affecting age and C-peptide levels at diagnosis of diabetes. METHODS: Age-at-diagnosis of diabetes, BMI, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, physical activity, and pre-existing myocardial infarction, stroke, or peripheral arterial insufficiency were registered at ordinary care visits close to diagnosis of diabetes, for the 43 women (9.4% of 456 from DKK with complete data for this analysis) with self-reported previous GDM (yes/no) and 86 controls without it, matched for date of diagnosis of diabetes. Blood samples were centrally analyzed for GADA and C-peptide for classification of diabetes. RESULTS: Women with previous GDM had lower mean age-at-diagnosis of diabetes, 53.4 vs 65.0 years, lower systolic blood pressure (SBP), 131.2 vs 137.5 mmHg, and fewer had pre-existing hypertension than without previous GDM (p < 0.001–0.05). Among antibody negative women with previous GDM, BMI (p = 0.024), hypertension (p = 0.023) and hyperlipidemia (p < 0.001) were associated with higher levels of C-peptide, while physical activity was inversely associated (p = 0.035), and SBP (p = 0.02) and hypertension (p = 0.016) were associated with age-at-diagnosis of diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Women with previous GDM were a decade younger and had lower prevalence of hypertension at diagnosis of diabetes; C-peptide levels were associated with BMI, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia and showed a tendency to be lower, possibly indicating a phenotype with higher risk of overt cardiovascular disease later in life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10289942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102899422023-06-25 A comparison in women with newly diagnosed diabetes between those with and without a history of gestational diabetes: a new perspective Stogianni, Anna Melin, Eva Dereke, Jonathan Rööst, Mattias Hillman, Magnus Landin-Olsson, Mona Wanby, Pär Thunander, Maria Acta Diabetol Original Article AIMS: Previous gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) entails increased risk of future diabetes. We describe the characteristics of women with previous GDM and compare with no previous GDM from the cohort Diabetes in Kalmar and Kronoberg (DKK) of 1248 adults, 40% women, with new diabetes, and factors affecting age and C-peptide levels at diagnosis of diabetes. METHODS: Age-at-diagnosis of diabetes, BMI, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, physical activity, and pre-existing myocardial infarction, stroke, or peripheral arterial insufficiency were registered at ordinary care visits close to diagnosis of diabetes, for the 43 women (9.4% of 456 from DKK with complete data for this analysis) with self-reported previous GDM (yes/no) and 86 controls without it, matched for date of diagnosis of diabetes. Blood samples were centrally analyzed for GADA and C-peptide for classification of diabetes. RESULTS: Women with previous GDM had lower mean age-at-diagnosis of diabetes, 53.4 vs 65.0 years, lower systolic blood pressure (SBP), 131.2 vs 137.5 mmHg, and fewer had pre-existing hypertension than without previous GDM (p < 0.001–0.05). Among antibody negative women with previous GDM, BMI (p = 0.024), hypertension (p = 0.023) and hyperlipidemia (p < 0.001) were associated with higher levels of C-peptide, while physical activity was inversely associated (p = 0.035), and SBP (p = 0.02) and hypertension (p = 0.016) were associated with age-at-diagnosis of diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Women with previous GDM were a decade younger and had lower prevalence of hypertension at diagnosis of diabetes; C-peptide levels were associated with BMI, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia and showed a tendency to be lower, possibly indicating a phenotype with higher risk of overt cardiovascular disease later in life. Springer Milan 2023-04-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10289942/ /pubmed/37119303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00592-023-02096-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Stogianni, Anna
Melin, Eva
Dereke, Jonathan
Rööst, Mattias
Hillman, Magnus
Landin-Olsson, Mona
Wanby, Pär
Thunander, Maria
A comparison in women with newly diagnosed diabetes between those with and without a history of gestational diabetes: a new perspective
title A comparison in women with newly diagnosed diabetes between those with and without a history of gestational diabetes: a new perspective
title_full A comparison in women with newly diagnosed diabetes between those with and without a history of gestational diabetes: a new perspective
title_fullStr A comparison in women with newly diagnosed diabetes between those with and without a history of gestational diabetes: a new perspective
title_full_unstemmed A comparison in women with newly diagnosed diabetes between those with and without a history of gestational diabetes: a new perspective
title_short A comparison in women with newly diagnosed diabetes between those with and without a history of gestational diabetes: a new perspective
title_sort comparison in women with newly diagnosed diabetes between those with and without a history of gestational diabetes: a new perspective
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10289942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37119303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00592-023-02096-x
work_keys_str_mv AT stogiannianna acomparisoninwomenwithnewlydiagnoseddiabetesbetweenthosewithandwithoutahistoryofgestationaldiabetesanewperspective
AT melineva acomparisoninwomenwithnewlydiagnoseddiabetesbetweenthosewithandwithoutahistoryofgestationaldiabetesanewperspective
AT derekejonathan acomparisoninwomenwithnewlydiagnoseddiabetesbetweenthosewithandwithoutahistoryofgestationaldiabetesanewperspective
AT roostmattias acomparisoninwomenwithnewlydiagnoseddiabetesbetweenthosewithandwithoutahistoryofgestationaldiabetesanewperspective
AT hillmanmagnus acomparisoninwomenwithnewlydiagnoseddiabetesbetweenthosewithandwithoutahistoryofgestationaldiabetesanewperspective
AT landinolssonmona acomparisoninwomenwithnewlydiagnoseddiabetesbetweenthosewithandwithoutahistoryofgestationaldiabetesanewperspective
AT wanbypar acomparisoninwomenwithnewlydiagnoseddiabetesbetweenthosewithandwithoutahistoryofgestationaldiabetesanewperspective
AT thunandermaria acomparisoninwomenwithnewlydiagnoseddiabetesbetweenthosewithandwithoutahistoryofgestationaldiabetesanewperspective
AT stogiannianna comparisoninwomenwithnewlydiagnoseddiabetesbetweenthosewithandwithoutahistoryofgestationaldiabetesanewperspective
AT melineva comparisoninwomenwithnewlydiagnoseddiabetesbetweenthosewithandwithoutahistoryofgestationaldiabetesanewperspective
AT derekejonathan comparisoninwomenwithnewlydiagnoseddiabetesbetweenthosewithandwithoutahistoryofgestationaldiabetesanewperspective
AT roostmattias comparisoninwomenwithnewlydiagnoseddiabetesbetweenthosewithandwithoutahistoryofgestationaldiabetesanewperspective
AT hillmanmagnus comparisoninwomenwithnewlydiagnoseddiabetesbetweenthosewithandwithoutahistoryofgestationaldiabetesanewperspective
AT landinolssonmona comparisoninwomenwithnewlydiagnoseddiabetesbetweenthosewithandwithoutahistoryofgestationaldiabetesanewperspective
AT wanbypar comparisoninwomenwithnewlydiagnoseddiabetesbetweenthosewithandwithoutahistoryofgestationaldiabetesanewperspective
AT thunandermaria comparisoninwomenwithnewlydiagnoseddiabetesbetweenthosewithandwithoutahistoryofgestationaldiabetesanewperspective