Cargando…

Comparison of Recovery Effect for Sufentanil vs. Remifentanil Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Curative Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of sufentanil vs. remifentanil anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Medical records of elderly patients aged ≥ 65 years who received curative resect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ji, Nan, Zhang, Yan, Li, Lin, Du, Jinju, Tan, Shigang, Liu, Fang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10289946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37243868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00522-0
_version_ 1785062388374962176
author Ji, Nan
Zhang, Yan
Li, Lin
Du, Jinju
Tan, Shigang
Liu, Fang
author_facet Ji, Nan
Zhang, Yan
Li, Lin
Du, Jinju
Tan, Shigang
Liu, Fang
author_sort Ji, Nan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of sufentanil vs. remifentanil anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Medical records of elderly patients aged ≥ 65 years who received curative resection for HCC between January 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into either the sufentanil group or the remifentanil group according to the method of analgesia used. Vital signs including mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and arterial oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), distribution of T-cell subsets (CD3, CD4, and CD8 lymphocytes), distribution of the stress response index [cortisol (COR), interleukin (IL)-6, C-reactive protein (CRP), and glucose (GLU)] were recorded prior to anesthesia (T0), after induction of anesthesia (T1), at the end of surgery (T2), 24 h after surgery (T3), and 72 h after surgery (T4). Postoperative adverse events were collected. RESULTS: Repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that after controlling for baseline patient demographic and treatment characteristics as covariates, both between- and within-group effects were significant (all P < 0.01), and the interaction between time and treatments was also significant (all P < 0.01) in the vital signs (MAP, HR, and SpO(2)), distribution of T-cell subsets (CD3, CD4, and CD8 lymphocytes), and distribution of the stress response index (COR, IL-6, CRP, and GLU), indicating that sufentanil led to stable hemodynamic and respiratory functions, lower reduction of T-lymphocyte subsets, and stable stress response indices compared to remifentanil. There is no significant difference in adverse reactions between the two groups (P = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Sufentanil was associated with improved hemodynamic and respiratory function, less stress response, less inhibition of cellular immunity, and similar adverse reactions compared with remifentanil.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10289946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102899462023-06-25 Comparison of Recovery Effect for Sufentanil vs. Remifentanil Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Curative Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ji, Nan Zhang, Yan Li, Lin Du, Jinju Tan, Shigang Liu, Fang Pain Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of sufentanil vs. remifentanil anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Medical records of elderly patients aged ≥ 65 years who received curative resection for HCC between January 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into either the sufentanil group or the remifentanil group according to the method of analgesia used. Vital signs including mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and arterial oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), distribution of T-cell subsets (CD3, CD4, and CD8 lymphocytes), distribution of the stress response index [cortisol (COR), interleukin (IL)-6, C-reactive protein (CRP), and glucose (GLU)] were recorded prior to anesthesia (T0), after induction of anesthesia (T1), at the end of surgery (T2), 24 h after surgery (T3), and 72 h after surgery (T4). Postoperative adverse events were collected. RESULTS: Repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that after controlling for baseline patient demographic and treatment characteristics as covariates, both between- and within-group effects were significant (all P < 0.01), and the interaction between time and treatments was also significant (all P < 0.01) in the vital signs (MAP, HR, and SpO(2)), distribution of T-cell subsets (CD3, CD4, and CD8 lymphocytes), and distribution of the stress response index (COR, IL-6, CRP, and GLU), indicating that sufentanil led to stable hemodynamic and respiratory functions, lower reduction of T-lymphocyte subsets, and stable stress response indices compared to remifentanil. There is no significant difference in adverse reactions between the two groups (P = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Sufentanil was associated with improved hemodynamic and respiratory function, less stress response, less inhibition of cellular immunity, and similar adverse reactions compared with remifentanil. Springer Healthcare 2023-05-27 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10289946/ /pubmed/37243868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00522-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Ji, Nan
Zhang, Yan
Li, Lin
Du, Jinju
Tan, Shigang
Liu, Fang
Comparison of Recovery Effect for Sufentanil vs. Remifentanil Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Curative Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title Comparison of Recovery Effect for Sufentanil vs. Remifentanil Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Curative Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full Comparison of Recovery Effect for Sufentanil vs. Remifentanil Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Curative Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_fullStr Comparison of Recovery Effect for Sufentanil vs. Remifentanil Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Curative Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Recovery Effect for Sufentanil vs. Remifentanil Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Curative Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_short Comparison of Recovery Effect for Sufentanil vs. Remifentanil Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Curative Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_sort comparison of recovery effect for sufentanil vs. remifentanil anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10289946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37243868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00522-0
work_keys_str_mv AT jinan comparisonofrecoveryeffectforsufentanilvsremifentanilanesthesiainelderlypatientsundergoingcurativeresectionforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT zhangyan comparisonofrecoveryeffectforsufentanilvsremifentanilanesthesiainelderlypatientsundergoingcurativeresectionforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT lilin comparisonofrecoveryeffectforsufentanilvsremifentanilanesthesiainelderlypatientsundergoingcurativeresectionforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT dujinju comparisonofrecoveryeffectforsufentanilvsremifentanilanesthesiainelderlypatientsundergoingcurativeresectionforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT tanshigang comparisonofrecoveryeffectforsufentanilvsremifentanilanesthesiainelderlypatientsundergoingcurativeresectionforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT liufang comparisonofrecoveryeffectforsufentanilvsremifentanilanesthesiainelderlypatientsundergoingcurativeresectionforhepatocellularcarcinoma