Cargando…
Efficacy and safety profile of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors in the management of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Several guidelines have recommended the use of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) as replacement for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the management of heart failure. Till date, there are no reviews done that comprehensively cover different aspects of efficacy and safety p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10289972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36184714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-022-10273-3 |
_version_ | 1785062392945704960 |
---|---|
author | Gao, Juan Zhao, Cong Zhang, Wen-Zhong Liu, Song Xin, Hui Lian, Zhe-Xun |
author_facet | Gao, Juan Zhao, Cong Zhang, Wen-Zhong Liu, Song Xin, Hui Lian, Zhe-Xun |
author_sort | Gao, Juan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several guidelines have recommended the use of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) as replacement for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the management of heart failure. Till date, there are no reviews done that comprehensively cover different aspects of efficacy and safety parameters. Hence, we have performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis on role of ARNIs for the management of heart failure patients. Searches were done in Embase, Scopus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed Central, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect and Clinicaltrials.gov until June 2022. Risk of bias assessment was done with Cochrane’s risk of bias tool. Meta-analysis was carried out using random-effects model. Pooled standardized mean difference (SMD)/mean difference (MD) and/or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was reported. In total, we analysed 34 studies, with almost all of them had a high risk of bias. Pooled RR was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82–0.95) for all-cause mortality, 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77–0.92) for cardiovascular mortality and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70–0.87) for hospitalization. Pooled MD was 3.74 (95% CI: 1.93–5.55) for left ventricular ejection fraction, −2.16 (95% CI: −3.58 to −0.74) for left atrial volume index, −3.80 (95% CI: −6.60 to −1.00) for left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and −1.16 (95% CI: −1.98 to −0.35) for E/E′ ratio. Regarding adverse events, pooled RR was 1.55 (95% CI: 1.31–1.85) for symptomatic hypotension, 0.93 (95% CI: 0.78–1.11) for worsening renal function, 1.09 (95% CI: 0.94–1.26) for hyperkalaemia and 1.29 (95% CI: 0.67–2.50) for angioedema. ARNIs had beneficial efficacy and safety profile on the management of heart failure especially patients with reduced ejection fraction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10741-022-10273-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10289972 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102899722023-06-25 Efficacy and safety profile of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors in the management of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Gao, Juan Zhao, Cong Zhang, Wen-Zhong Liu, Song Xin, Hui Lian, Zhe-Xun Heart Fail Rev Article Several guidelines have recommended the use of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) as replacement for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the management of heart failure. Till date, there are no reviews done that comprehensively cover different aspects of efficacy and safety parameters. Hence, we have performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis on role of ARNIs for the management of heart failure patients. Searches were done in Embase, Scopus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed Central, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect and Clinicaltrials.gov until June 2022. Risk of bias assessment was done with Cochrane’s risk of bias tool. Meta-analysis was carried out using random-effects model. Pooled standardized mean difference (SMD)/mean difference (MD) and/or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was reported. In total, we analysed 34 studies, with almost all of them had a high risk of bias. Pooled RR was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82–0.95) for all-cause mortality, 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77–0.92) for cardiovascular mortality and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70–0.87) for hospitalization. Pooled MD was 3.74 (95% CI: 1.93–5.55) for left ventricular ejection fraction, −2.16 (95% CI: −3.58 to −0.74) for left atrial volume index, −3.80 (95% CI: −6.60 to −1.00) for left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and −1.16 (95% CI: −1.98 to −0.35) for E/E′ ratio. Regarding adverse events, pooled RR was 1.55 (95% CI: 1.31–1.85) for symptomatic hypotension, 0.93 (95% CI: 0.78–1.11) for worsening renal function, 1.09 (95% CI: 0.94–1.26) for hyperkalaemia and 1.29 (95% CI: 0.67–2.50) for angioedema. ARNIs had beneficial efficacy and safety profile on the management of heart failure especially patients with reduced ejection fraction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10741-022-10273-3. Springer US 2022-10-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10289972/ /pubmed/36184714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-022-10273-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Gao, Juan Zhao, Cong Zhang, Wen-Zhong Liu, Song Xin, Hui Lian, Zhe-Xun Efficacy and safety profile of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors in the management of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | Efficacy and safety profile of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors in the management of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Efficacy and safety profile of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors in the management of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety profile of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors in the management of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety profile of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors in the management of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Efficacy and safety profile of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors in the management of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | efficacy and safety profile of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors in the management of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10289972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36184714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-022-10273-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaojuan efficacyandsafetyprofileofangiotensinreceptorneprilysininhibitorsinthemanagementofheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhaocong efficacyandsafetyprofileofangiotensinreceptorneprilysininhibitorsinthemanagementofheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhangwenzhong efficacyandsafetyprofileofangiotensinreceptorneprilysininhibitorsinthemanagementofheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liusong efficacyandsafetyprofileofangiotensinreceptorneprilysininhibitorsinthemanagementofheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT xinhui efficacyandsafetyprofileofangiotensinreceptorneprilysininhibitorsinthemanagementofheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT lianzhexun efficacyandsafetyprofileofangiotensinreceptorneprilysininhibitorsinthemanagementofheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |