Cargando…

Comparison of guideline concordant antibiotic prophylaxis in Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs dental settings among those with cardiac conditions or prosthetic joints

BACKGROUND: No research has been conducted to assess whether antibiotic prophylaxis prescribing differs by dental setting. Therefore, the goal of this study was to compare the prescribing of antibiotic prophylaxis in Veterans Affairs (VA) and non-Veterans Affairs settings. METHODS: This was a retros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramanathan, Swetha, Evans, Charlesnika T., Hershow, Ronald C., Calip, Gregory S., Rowan, Susan, Hubbard, Colin, Suda, Katie J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37353757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08400-y
_version_ 1785062465019576320
author Ramanathan, Swetha
Evans, Charlesnika T.
Hershow, Ronald C.
Calip, Gregory S.
Rowan, Susan
Hubbard, Colin
Suda, Katie J.
author_facet Ramanathan, Swetha
Evans, Charlesnika T.
Hershow, Ronald C.
Calip, Gregory S.
Rowan, Susan
Hubbard, Colin
Suda, Katie J.
author_sort Ramanathan, Swetha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: No research has been conducted to assess whether antibiotic prophylaxis prescribing differs by dental setting. Therefore, the goal of this study was to compare the prescribing of antibiotic prophylaxis in Veterans Affairs (VA) and non-Veterans Affairs settings. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of veteran and non-veteran dental patients with cardiac conditions or prosthetic joints between 2015–2017. Multivariable log binomial regression analysis was conducted to compare concordant prescribing by setting with a sub-analysis for errors of dosing based on antibiotic duration (i.e., days prescribed). RESULTS: A total of 61,124 dental visits that received a prophylactic antibiotic were included. Most were male (61.0%), and 55 years of age or older (76.2%). Nearly a third (32.7%) received guideline concordant prophylaxis. VA dental settings had a lower prevalence of guideline concordant prescribing compared to non-VA settings in unadjusted results (unadjusted prevalence ratio [uPR] = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.90–0.95). After adjustment, prevalence of guideline concordant prescribing was higher in those with prosthetic joints in the VA setting (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.59–1.88), with no difference identified in those without a prosthetic joint (aPR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.96–1.01). Concordance of dosing was higher in VA compared to non-VA settings (aPR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07–1.15). CONCLUSIONS: VA has a higher prevalence of guideline concordant prescribing among those with prosthetic joints and when assessing dosing errors. Though the presence of an integrated electronic health record (EHR) may be contributing to these differences, other system or prescriber-related factors may be responsible. Future studies should focus on to what extent the integrated EHR may be responsible for increased guideline concordant prescribing in the VA setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-023-08400-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10290301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102903012023-06-25 Comparison of guideline concordant antibiotic prophylaxis in Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs dental settings among those with cardiac conditions or prosthetic joints Ramanathan, Swetha Evans, Charlesnika T. Hershow, Ronald C. Calip, Gregory S. Rowan, Susan Hubbard, Colin Suda, Katie J. BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: No research has been conducted to assess whether antibiotic prophylaxis prescribing differs by dental setting. Therefore, the goal of this study was to compare the prescribing of antibiotic prophylaxis in Veterans Affairs (VA) and non-Veterans Affairs settings. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of veteran and non-veteran dental patients with cardiac conditions or prosthetic joints between 2015–2017. Multivariable log binomial regression analysis was conducted to compare concordant prescribing by setting with a sub-analysis for errors of dosing based on antibiotic duration (i.e., days prescribed). RESULTS: A total of 61,124 dental visits that received a prophylactic antibiotic were included. Most were male (61.0%), and 55 years of age or older (76.2%). Nearly a third (32.7%) received guideline concordant prophylaxis. VA dental settings had a lower prevalence of guideline concordant prescribing compared to non-VA settings in unadjusted results (unadjusted prevalence ratio [uPR] = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.90–0.95). After adjustment, prevalence of guideline concordant prescribing was higher in those with prosthetic joints in the VA setting (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.59–1.88), with no difference identified in those without a prosthetic joint (aPR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.96–1.01). Concordance of dosing was higher in VA compared to non-VA settings (aPR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07–1.15). CONCLUSIONS: VA has a higher prevalence of guideline concordant prescribing among those with prosthetic joints and when assessing dosing errors. Though the presence of an integrated electronic health record (EHR) may be contributing to these differences, other system or prescriber-related factors may be responsible. Future studies should focus on to what extent the integrated EHR may be responsible for increased guideline concordant prescribing in the VA setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-023-08400-y. BioMed Central 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10290301/ /pubmed/37353757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08400-y Text en © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ramanathan, Swetha
Evans, Charlesnika T.
Hershow, Ronald C.
Calip, Gregory S.
Rowan, Susan
Hubbard, Colin
Suda, Katie J.
Comparison of guideline concordant antibiotic prophylaxis in Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs dental settings among those with cardiac conditions or prosthetic joints
title Comparison of guideline concordant antibiotic prophylaxis in Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs dental settings among those with cardiac conditions or prosthetic joints
title_full Comparison of guideline concordant antibiotic prophylaxis in Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs dental settings among those with cardiac conditions or prosthetic joints
title_fullStr Comparison of guideline concordant antibiotic prophylaxis in Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs dental settings among those with cardiac conditions or prosthetic joints
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of guideline concordant antibiotic prophylaxis in Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs dental settings among those with cardiac conditions or prosthetic joints
title_short Comparison of guideline concordant antibiotic prophylaxis in Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs dental settings among those with cardiac conditions or prosthetic joints
title_sort comparison of guideline concordant antibiotic prophylaxis in veterans affairs and non-veterans affairs dental settings among those with cardiac conditions or prosthetic joints
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37353757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08400-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ramanathanswetha comparisonofguidelineconcordantantibioticprophylaxisinveteransaffairsandnonveteransaffairsdentalsettingsamongthosewithcardiacconditionsorprostheticjoints
AT evanscharlesnikat comparisonofguidelineconcordantantibioticprophylaxisinveteransaffairsandnonveteransaffairsdentalsettingsamongthosewithcardiacconditionsorprostheticjoints
AT hershowronaldc comparisonofguidelineconcordantantibioticprophylaxisinveteransaffairsandnonveteransaffairsdentalsettingsamongthosewithcardiacconditionsorprostheticjoints
AT calipgregorys comparisonofguidelineconcordantantibioticprophylaxisinveteransaffairsandnonveteransaffairsdentalsettingsamongthosewithcardiacconditionsorprostheticjoints
AT rowansusan comparisonofguidelineconcordantantibioticprophylaxisinveteransaffairsandnonveteransaffairsdentalsettingsamongthosewithcardiacconditionsorprostheticjoints
AT hubbardcolin comparisonofguidelineconcordantantibioticprophylaxisinveteransaffairsandnonveteransaffairsdentalsettingsamongthosewithcardiacconditionsorprostheticjoints
AT sudakatiej comparisonofguidelineconcordantantibioticprophylaxisinveteransaffairsandnonveteransaffairsdentalsettingsamongthosewithcardiacconditionsorprostheticjoints