Cargando…

Comparing video examinations with physical clinical examinations using finishing pigs with umbilical outpouchings as a model

BACKGROUND: Veterinary telemedicine has only been adopted to some degree. One aspect that needs to be evaluated is clinical examinations using video. The objective of this study was to evaluate agreement between a traditional physical clinical examination and a clinical examination using recorded vi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birch, Julie Melsted, Pedersen, Ken Steen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37355609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-023-00689-8
_version_ 1785062471399112704
author Birch, Julie Melsted
Pedersen, Ken Steen
author_facet Birch, Julie Melsted
Pedersen, Ken Steen
author_sort Birch, Julie Melsted
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Veterinary telemedicine has only been adopted to some degree. One aspect that needs to be evaluated is clinical examinations using video. The objective of this study was to evaluate agreement between a traditional physical clinical examination and a clinical examination using recorded video using finishing pigs with umbilical outpouchings (umbilical hernias, cysts, and abscesses) as the study unit. A total of 102 finisher pigs with umbilical outpouchings were clinically examined and recorded on video. Four experienced pig veterinarians were allowed to examine each pig for approximately 10 min and were individually asked to fill out a predesigned clinical record. Approximately 1 month after the physical examinations, the veterinarians individually reexamined all 102 pigs in a blinded manner, utilizing the video recordings and filling in a predesigned clinical record. RESULTS: For all measurements using a ruler, a high Pearson correlation coefficient was observed between physical and video examinations (range 0.69–0.95). In comparison, the visual bodyweight estimation had a lower Pearson correlation coefficient (range 0.57–0.64). Substantial to almost perfect agreement was observed between the physical and video examinations for abnormal weight distribution on any leg, restricted gait movements, lameness, signs of pain, fitness for transportation, presence of wounds, and categorization of the number of wounds > 4 cm(2) on the umbilical outpouching (mean Kappa range 0.67–0.87). Fair agreement was observed for the presence of perineal soiling, ear wounds, pendulation of umbilical outpouching, umbilical outpouching touching the legs, skin not movable over the umbilical outpouching, and umbilical outpouching wound characteristics: type, presence of crusts, active bleeding, thick wound edges, connective tissue (mean Kappa range 0.21–0.40). Slight agreement was observed for umbilical outpouching characteristics: shape, macroscopic vascularization of the skin covering the outpouching, and the presence of scars, excoriations, and fistulas (mean Kappa range 0.10–0.20). Poor agreement was observed for the presence of granulation tissue (mean Kappa =  − 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The agreement between a physical clinical examination and a clinical examination using recorded video of the same pig varies from poor to almost perfect, depending on the clinical sign and the executing veterinarian. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13028-023-00689-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10290328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102903282023-06-25 Comparing video examinations with physical clinical examinations using finishing pigs with umbilical outpouchings as a model Birch, Julie Melsted Pedersen, Ken Steen Acta Vet Scand Research BACKGROUND: Veterinary telemedicine has only been adopted to some degree. One aspect that needs to be evaluated is clinical examinations using video. The objective of this study was to evaluate agreement between a traditional physical clinical examination and a clinical examination using recorded video using finishing pigs with umbilical outpouchings (umbilical hernias, cysts, and abscesses) as the study unit. A total of 102 finisher pigs with umbilical outpouchings were clinically examined and recorded on video. Four experienced pig veterinarians were allowed to examine each pig for approximately 10 min and were individually asked to fill out a predesigned clinical record. Approximately 1 month after the physical examinations, the veterinarians individually reexamined all 102 pigs in a blinded manner, utilizing the video recordings and filling in a predesigned clinical record. RESULTS: For all measurements using a ruler, a high Pearson correlation coefficient was observed between physical and video examinations (range 0.69–0.95). In comparison, the visual bodyweight estimation had a lower Pearson correlation coefficient (range 0.57–0.64). Substantial to almost perfect agreement was observed between the physical and video examinations for abnormal weight distribution on any leg, restricted gait movements, lameness, signs of pain, fitness for transportation, presence of wounds, and categorization of the number of wounds > 4 cm(2) on the umbilical outpouching (mean Kappa range 0.67–0.87). Fair agreement was observed for the presence of perineal soiling, ear wounds, pendulation of umbilical outpouching, umbilical outpouching touching the legs, skin not movable over the umbilical outpouching, and umbilical outpouching wound characteristics: type, presence of crusts, active bleeding, thick wound edges, connective tissue (mean Kappa range 0.21–0.40). Slight agreement was observed for umbilical outpouching characteristics: shape, macroscopic vascularization of the skin covering the outpouching, and the presence of scars, excoriations, and fistulas (mean Kappa range 0.10–0.20). Poor agreement was observed for the presence of granulation tissue (mean Kappa =  − 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The agreement between a physical clinical examination and a clinical examination using recorded video of the same pig varies from poor to almost perfect, depending on the clinical sign and the executing veterinarian. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13028-023-00689-8. BioMed Central 2023-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10290328/ /pubmed/37355609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-023-00689-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Birch, Julie Melsted
Pedersen, Ken Steen
Comparing video examinations with physical clinical examinations using finishing pigs with umbilical outpouchings as a model
title Comparing video examinations with physical clinical examinations using finishing pigs with umbilical outpouchings as a model
title_full Comparing video examinations with physical clinical examinations using finishing pigs with umbilical outpouchings as a model
title_fullStr Comparing video examinations with physical clinical examinations using finishing pigs with umbilical outpouchings as a model
title_full_unstemmed Comparing video examinations with physical clinical examinations using finishing pigs with umbilical outpouchings as a model
title_short Comparing video examinations with physical clinical examinations using finishing pigs with umbilical outpouchings as a model
title_sort comparing video examinations with physical clinical examinations using finishing pigs with umbilical outpouchings as a model
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37355609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-023-00689-8
work_keys_str_mv AT birchjuliemelsted comparingvideoexaminationswithphysicalclinicalexaminationsusingfinishingpigswithumbilicaloutpouchingsasamodel
AT pedersenkensteen comparingvideoexaminationswithphysicalclinicalexaminationsusingfinishingpigswithumbilicaloutpouchingsasamodel