Cargando…

The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples’ preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVES: Understanding young people’s preferences for healthcare is critical for reducing the negative effect of undesirable choices. This review aims to synthesise the evidence obtained from discrete choice experiments (DCEs) eliciting young people’s preferences for healthcare interventions and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Galina, Kinchin, Irina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36169764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01528-9
_version_ 1785062524457058304
author Williams, Galina
Kinchin, Irina
author_facet Williams, Galina
Kinchin, Irina
author_sort Williams, Galina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Understanding young people’s preferences for healthcare is critical for reducing the negative effect of undesirable choices. This review aims to synthesise the evidence obtained from discrete choice experiments (DCEs) eliciting young people’s preferences for healthcare interventions and service deliveries, specifically, to (1) examine the methodology, including a selection of attributes and levels, experimental design, estimation procedure and validity; (2) evaluate similarities, differences and rigour of designs to the general population DCEs; and, (3) compare the DCEs’ application to the seven health priority areas defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO). METHODS: A systematic review searching Medline, EconLIT, PsychINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed up until May 2021. Inclusion criteria: a DCE, eliciting young peoples’ preferences (10–24 years of age), on a healthcare-related topic defined by WHO, peer-reviewed, full-text available in English. A bespoke checklist was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. RESULTS: Eighteen DCE studies were included in the review, exploring interventions and service in sexual and reproductive health (n = 9; 50%), smoking cessation (n = 4; 22%), mental health (n = 1), nutrition (n = 1), unintentional injuries (n = 1), vaccination against severe but rare diseases (n = 1); and diabetes (n = 1). Compared to the general population, DCEs eliciting young people’s preferences had a high proportion of monetary measures and a smaller number of choices per respondent with the overwhelming number of surveys using fractional factorial design. The majority of studies were of moderate quality (50–75% of the criteria met). CONCLUSIONS: While identified DCEs touched on most health priority areas, the scope was limited. The conduct and reporting of DCEs with young people could be improved by including the state-of-the-art design, estimation procedures and analysis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10198-022-01528-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10290600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102906002023-06-26 The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples’ preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review Williams, Galina Kinchin, Irina Eur J Health Econ Original Paper OBJECTIVES: Understanding young people’s preferences for healthcare is critical for reducing the negative effect of undesirable choices. This review aims to synthesise the evidence obtained from discrete choice experiments (DCEs) eliciting young people’s preferences for healthcare interventions and service deliveries, specifically, to (1) examine the methodology, including a selection of attributes and levels, experimental design, estimation procedure and validity; (2) evaluate similarities, differences and rigour of designs to the general population DCEs; and, (3) compare the DCEs’ application to the seven health priority areas defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO). METHODS: A systematic review searching Medline, EconLIT, PsychINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed up until May 2021. Inclusion criteria: a DCE, eliciting young peoples’ preferences (10–24 years of age), on a healthcare-related topic defined by WHO, peer-reviewed, full-text available in English. A bespoke checklist was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. RESULTS: Eighteen DCE studies were included in the review, exploring interventions and service in sexual and reproductive health (n = 9; 50%), smoking cessation (n = 4; 22%), mental health (n = 1), nutrition (n = 1), unintentional injuries (n = 1), vaccination against severe but rare diseases (n = 1); and diabetes (n = 1). Compared to the general population, DCEs eliciting young people’s preferences had a high proportion of monetary measures and a smaller number of choices per respondent with the overwhelming number of surveys using fractional factorial design. The majority of studies were of moderate quality (50–75% of the criteria met). CONCLUSIONS: While identified DCEs touched on most health priority areas, the scope was limited. The conduct and reporting of DCEs with young people could be improved by including the state-of-the-art design, estimation procedures and analysis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10198-022-01528-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10290600/ /pubmed/36169764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01528-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Williams, Galina
Kinchin, Irina
The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples’ preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review
title The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples’ preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review
title_full The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples’ preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples’ preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples’ preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review
title_short The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples’ preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review
title_sort application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples’ preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36169764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01528-9
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsgalina theapplicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentselicitingyoungpeoplespreferencesforhealthcareasystematicliteraturereview
AT kinchinirina theapplicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentselicitingyoungpeoplespreferencesforhealthcareasystematicliteraturereview
AT williamsgalina applicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentselicitingyoungpeoplespreferencesforhealthcareasystematicliteraturereview
AT kinchinirina applicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentselicitingyoungpeoplespreferencesforhealthcareasystematicliteraturereview