Cargando…
A data-driven approach for modelling Karst spring discharge using transfer function noise models
Karst aquifers are important sources of fresh water on a global scale. The hydrological modelling of karst spring discharge, however, still poses a challenge. In this study we apply a transfer function noise (TFN) model in combination with a bucket-type recharge model to simulate karst spring discha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37366470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11012-z |
_version_ | 1785062527325962240 |
---|---|
author | Rudolph, Max Gustav Collenteur, Raoul Alexander Kavousi, Alireza Giese, Markus Wöhling, Thomas Birk, Steffen Hartmann, Andreas Reimann, Thomas |
author_facet | Rudolph, Max Gustav Collenteur, Raoul Alexander Kavousi, Alireza Giese, Markus Wöhling, Thomas Birk, Steffen Hartmann, Andreas Reimann, Thomas |
author_sort | Rudolph, Max Gustav |
collection | PubMed |
description | Karst aquifers are important sources of fresh water on a global scale. The hydrological modelling of karst spring discharge, however, still poses a challenge. In this study we apply a transfer function noise (TFN) model in combination with a bucket-type recharge model to simulate karst spring discharge. The application of the noise model for the residual series has the advantage that it is more consistent with assumptions for optimization such as homoscedasticity and independence. In an earlier hydrological modeling study, named Karst Modeling Challenge (KMC; Jeannin et al., J Hydrol 600:126–508, 2021), several modelling approaches were compared for the Milandre Karst System in Switzerland. This serves as a benchmark and we apply the TFN model to KMC data, subsequently comparing the results to other models. Using different data-model-combinations, the most promising data-model-combination is identified in a three-step least-squares calibration. To quantify uncertainty, the Bayesian approach of Markov-chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling is subsequently used with uniform priors for the previously identified best data-model combination. The MCMC maximum likelihood solution is used to simulate spring discharge for a previously unseen testing period, indicating a superior performance compared to all other models in the KMC. It is found that the model gives a physically feasible representation of the system, which is supported by field measurements. While the TFN model simulated rising limbs and flood recession especially well, medium and baseflow conditions were not represented as accurately. The TFN approach poses a well-performing data-driven alternative to other approaches that should be considered in future studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10290613 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102906132023-06-26 A data-driven approach for modelling Karst spring discharge using transfer function noise models Rudolph, Max Gustav Collenteur, Raoul Alexander Kavousi, Alireza Giese, Markus Wöhling, Thomas Birk, Steffen Hartmann, Andreas Reimann, Thomas Environ Earth Sci Original Article Karst aquifers are important sources of fresh water on a global scale. The hydrological modelling of karst spring discharge, however, still poses a challenge. In this study we apply a transfer function noise (TFN) model in combination with a bucket-type recharge model to simulate karst spring discharge. The application of the noise model for the residual series has the advantage that it is more consistent with assumptions for optimization such as homoscedasticity and independence. In an earlier hydrological modeling study, named Karst Modeling Challenge (KMC; Jeannin et al., J Hydrol 600:126–508, 2021), several modelling approaches were compared for the Milandre Karst System in Switzerland. This serves as a benchmark and we apply the TFN model to KMC data, subsequently comparing the results to other models. Using different data-model-combinations, the most promising data-model-combination is identified in a three-step least-squares calibration. To quantify uncertainty, the Bayesian approach of Markov-chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling is subsequently used with uniform priors for the previously identified best data-model combination. The MCMC maximum likelihood solution is used to simulate spring discharge for a previously unseen testing period, indicating a superior performance compared to all other models in the KMC. It is found that the model gives a physically feasible representation of the system, which is supported by field measurements. While the TFN model simulated rising limbs and flood recession especially well, medium and baseflow conditions were not represented as accurately. The TFN approach poses a well-performing data-driven alternative to other approaches that should be considered in future studies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10290613/ /pubmed/37366470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11012-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rudolph, Max Gustav Collenteur, Raoul Alexander Kavousi, Alireza Giese, Markus Wöhling, Thomas Birk, Steffen Hartmann, Andreas Reimann, Thomas A data-driven approach for modelling Karst spring discharge using transfer function noise models |
title | A data-driven approach for modelling Karst spring discharge using transfer function noise models |
title_full | A data-driven approach for modelling Karst spring discharge using transfer function noise models |
title_fullStr | A data-driven approach for modelling Karst spring discharge using transfer function noise models |
title_full_unstemmed | A data-driven approach for modelling Karst spring discharge using transfer function noise models |
title_short | A data-driven approach for modelling Karst spring discharge using transfer function noise models |
title_sort | data-driven approach for modelling karst spring discharge using transfer function noise models |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37366470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11012-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rudolphmaxgustav adatadrivenapproachformodellingkarstspringdischargeusingtransferfunctionnoisemodels AT collenteurraoulalexander adatadrivenapproachformodellingkarstspringdischargeusingtransferfunctionnoisemodels AT kavousialireza adatadrivenapproachformodellingkarstspringdischargeusingtransferfunctionnoisemodels AT giesemarkus adatadrivenapproachformodellingkarstspringdischargeusingtransferfunctionnoisemodels AT wohlingthomas adatadrivenapproachformodellingkarstspringdischargeusingtransferfunctionnoisemodels AT birksteffen adatadrivenapproachformodellingkarstspringdischargeusingtransferfunctionnoisemodels AT hartmannandreas adatadrivenapproachformodellingkarstspringdischargeusingtransferfunctionnoisemodels AT reimannthomas adatadrivenapproachformodellingkarstspringdischargeusingtransferfunctionnoisemodels AT rudolphmaxgustav datadrivenapproachformodellingkarstspringdischargeusingtransferfunctionnoisemodels AT collenteurraoulalexander datadrivenapproachformodellingkarstspringdischargeusingtransferfunctionnoisemodels AT kavousialireza datadrivenapproachformodellingkarstspringdischargeusingtransferfunctionnoisemodels AT giesemarkus datadrivenapproachformodellingkarstspringdischargeusingtransferfunctionnoisemodels AT wohlingthomas datadrivenapproachformodellingkarstspringdischargeusingtransferfunctionnoisemodels AT birksteffen datadrivenapproachformodellingkarstspringdischargeusingtransferfunctionnoisemodels AT hartmannandreas datadrivenapproachformodellingkarstspringdischargeusingtransferfunctionnoisemodels AT reimannthomas datadrivenapproachformodellingkarstspringdischargeusingtransferfunctionnoisemodels |