Cargando…
Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome
The gut microbiome is widely analyzed using high-throughput sequencing, such as 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SMS). DNA extraction is known to have a large impact on the metagenomic analyses. The aim of this study was to compare DNA extraction protocols for 16...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37355726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33959-6 |
_version_ | 1785062532060282880 |
---|---|
author | Elie, Céline Perret, Magali Hage, Hayat Sentausa, Erwin Hesketh, Amy Louis, Karen Fritah-Lafont, Asmaà Leissner, Philippe Vachon, Carole Rostaing, Hervé Reynier, Frédéric Gervasi, Gaspard Saliou, Adrien |
author_facet | Elie, Céline Perret, Magali Hage, Hayat Sentausa, Erwin Hesketh, Amy Louis, Karen Fritah-Lafont, Asmaà Leissner, Philippe Vachon, Carole Rostaing, Hervé Reynier, Frédéric Gervasi, Gaspard Saliou, Adrien |
author_sort | Elie, Céline |
collection | PubMed |
description | The gut microbiome is widely analyzed using high-throughput sequencing, such as 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SMS). DNA extraction is known to have a large impact on the metagenomic analyses. The aim of this study was to compare DNA extraction protocols for 16S sequencing. In that context, four commonly used DNA extraction methods were compared for the analysis of the gut microbiota. Commercial versions were evaluated against modified protocols using a stool preprocessing device (SPD, bioMérieux) upstream DNA extraction. Stool samples from nine healthy volunteers and nine patients with a Clostridium difficile infection were extracted with all protocols and 16S sequenced. Protocols were ranked using wet- and dry-lab criteria, including quality controls of the extracted genomic DNA, alpha-diversity, accuracy using a mock community of known composition and repeatability across technical replicates. SPD improved overall efficiency of three of the four tested protocols compared with their commercial version, in terms of DNA extraction yield, sample alpha-diversity, and recovery of Gram-positive bacteria. The best overall performance was obtained for the S-DQ protocol, SPD combined with the DNeasy PowerLyser PowerSoil protocol from QIAGEN. Based on this evaluation, we strongly believe that the use of such stool preprocessing device improves both the standardization and the quality of the DNA extraction in the human gut microbiome studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10290636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102906362023-06-26 Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome Elie, Céline Perret, Magali Hage, Hayat Sentausa, Erwin Hesketh, Amy Louis, Karen Fritah-Lafont, Asmaà Leissner, Philippe Vachon, Carole Rostaing, Hervé Reynier, Frédéric Gervasi, Gaspard Saliou, Adrien Sci Rep Article The gut microbiome is widely analyzed using high-throughput sequencing, such as 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SMS). DNA extraction is known to have a large impact on the metagenomic analyses. The aim of this study was to compare DNA extraction protocols for 16S sequencing. In that context, four commonly used DNA extraction methods were compared for the analysis of the gut microbiota. Commercial versions were evaluated against modified protocols using a stool preprocessing device (SPD, bioMérieux) upstream DNA extraction. Stool samples from nine healthy volunteers and nine patients with a Clostridium difficile infection were extracted with all protocols and 16S sequenced. Protocols were ranked using wet- and dry-lab criteria, including quality controls of the extracted genomic DNA, alpha-diversity, accuracy using a mock community of known composition and repeatability across technical replicates. SPD improved overall efficiency of three of the four tested protocols compared with their commercial version, in terms of DNA extraction yield, sample alpha-diversity, and recovery of Gram-positive bacteria. The best overall performance was obtained for the S-DQ protocol, SPD combined with the DNeasy PowerLyser PowerSoil protocol from QIAGEN. Based on this evaluation, we strongly believe that the use of such stool preprocessing device improves both the standardization and the quality of the DNA extraction in the human gut microbiome studies. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10290636/ /pubmed/37355726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33959-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Elie, Céline Perret, Magali Hage, Hayat Sentausa, Erwin Hesketh, Amy Louis, Karen Fritah-Lafont, Asmaà Leissner, Philippe Vachon, Carole Rostaing, Hervé Reynier, Frédéric Gervasi, Gaspard Saliou, Adrien Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome |
title | Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome |
title_full | Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome |
title_fullStr | Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome |
title_short | Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome |
title_sort | comparison of dna extraction methods for 16s rrna gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37355726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33959-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elieceline comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome AT perretmagali comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome AT hagehayat comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome AT sentausaerwin comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome AT heskethamy comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome AT louiskaren comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome AT fritahlafontasmaa comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome AT leissnerphilippe comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome AT vachoncarole comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome AT rostaingherve comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome AT reynierfrederic comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome AT gervasigaspard comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome AT saliouadrien comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome |