Cargando…

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome

The gut microbiome is widely analyzed using high-throughput sequencing, such as 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SMS). DNA extraction is known to have a large impact on the metagenomic analyses. The aim of this study was to compare DNA extraction protocols for 16...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elie, Céline, Perret, Magali, Hage, Hayat, Sentausa, Erwin, Hesketh, Amy, Louis, Karen, Fritah-Lafont, Asmaà, Leissner, Philippe, Vachon, Carole, Rostaing, Hervé, Reynier, Frédéric, Gervasi, Gaspard, Saliou, Adrien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37355726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33959-6
_version_ 1785062532060282880
author Elie, Céline
Perret, Magali
Hage, Hayat
Sentausa, Erwin
Hesketh, Amy
Louis, Karen
Fritah-Lafont, Asmaà
Leissner, Philippe
Vachon, Carole
Rostaing, Hervé
Reynier, Frédéric
Gervasi, Gaspard
Saliou, Adrien
author_facet Elie, Céline
Perret, Magali
Hage, Hayat
Sentausa, Erwin
Hesketh, Amy
Louis, Karen
Fritah-Lafont, Asmaà
Leissner, Philippe
Vachon, Carole
Rostaing, Hervé
Reynier, Frédéric
Gervasi, Gaspard
Saliou, Adrien
author_sort Elie, Céline
collection PubMed
description The gut microbiome is widely analyzed using high-throughput sequencing, such as 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SMS). DNA extraction is known to have a large impact on the metagenomic analyses. The aim of this study was to compare DNA extraction protocols for 16S sequencing. In that context, four commonly used DNA extraction methods were compared for the analysis of the gut microbiota. Commercial versions were evaluated against modified protocols using a stool preprocessing device (SPD, bioMérieux) upstream DNA extraction. Stool samples from nine healthy volunteers and nine patients with a Clostridium difficile infection were extracted with all protocols and 16S sequenced. Protocols were ranked using wet- and dry-lab criteria, including quality controls of the extracted genomic DNA, alpha-diversity, accuracy using a mock community of known composition and repeatability across technical replicates. SPD improved overall efficiency of three of the four tested protocols compared with their commercial version, in terms of DNA extraction yield, sample alpha-diversity, and recovery of Gram-positive bacteria. The best overall performance was obtained for the S-DQ protocol, SPD combined with the DNeasy PowerLyser PowerSoil protocol from QIAGEN. Based on this evaluation, we strongly believe that the use of such stool preprocessing device improves both the standardization and the quality of the DNA extraction in the human gut microbiome studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10290636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102906362023-06-26 Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome Elie, Céline Perret, Magali Hage, Hayat Sentausa, Erwin Hesketh, Amy Louis, Karen Fritah-Lafont, Asmaà Leissner, Philippe Vachon, Carole Rostaing, Hervé Reynier, Frédéric Gervasi, Gaspard Saliou, Adrien Sci Rep Article The gut microbiome is widely analyzed using high-throughput sequencing, such as 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SMS). DNA extraction is known to have a large impact on the metagenomic analyses. The aim of this study was to compare DNA extraction protocols for 16S sequencing. In that context, four commonly used DNA extraction methods were compared for the analysis of the gut microbiota. Commercial versions were evaluated against modified protocols using a stool preprocessing device (SPD, bioMérieux) upstream DNA extraction. Stool samples from nine healthy volunteers and nine patients with a Clostridium difficile infection were extracted with all protocols and 16S sequenced. Protocols were ranked using wet- and dry-lab criteria, including quality controls of the extracted genomic DNA, alpha-diversity, accuracy using a mock community of known composition and repeatability across technical replicates. SPD improved overall efficiency of three of the four tested protocols compared with their commercial version, in terms of DNA extraction yield, sample alpha-diversity, and recovery of Gram-positive bacteria. The best overall performance was obtained for the S-DQ protocol, SPD combined with the DNeasy PowerLyser PowerSoil protocol from QIAGEN. Based on this evaluation, we strongly believe that the use of such stool preprocessing device improves both the standardization and the quality of the DNA extraction in the human gut microbiome studies. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10290636/ /pubmed/37355726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33959-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Elie, Céline
Perret, Magali
Hage, Hayat
Sentausa, Erwin
Hesketh, Amy
Louis, Karen
Fritah-Lafont, Asmaà
Leissner, Philippe
Vachon, Carole
Rostaing, Hervé
Reynier, Frédéric
Gervasi, Gaspard
Saliou, Adrien
Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome
title Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome
title_full Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome
title_fullStr Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome
title_short Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome
title_sort comparison of dna extraction methods for 16s rrna gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37355726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33959-6
work_keys_str_mv AT elieceline comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome
AT perretmagali comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome
AT hagehayat comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome
AT sentausaerwin comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome
AT heskethamy comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome
AT louiskaren comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome
AT fritahlafontasmaa comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome
AT leissnerphilippe comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome
AT vachoncarole comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome
AT rostaingherve comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome
AT reynierfrederic comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome
AT gervasigaspard comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome
AT saliouadrien comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsfor16srrnagenesequencingintheanalysisofthehumangutmicrobiome