Cargando…
Titanium Versus Autologous Bone-Based Cranioplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
At present, there is no gold standard when looking at reconstructive evidence for cranioplasty with the use of autologous bone as well as other synthetic materials. Titanium has been considered recently as a good option due to its unique properties such as strength and biocompatibility. Numerous stu...
Autores principales: | Capitelli-McMahon, Helen, Kahlar, Narvair, Rahman, Shafiq |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37366436 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39516 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Cranioplasty Using Autologous Bone versus Porous Polyethylene versus Custom-Made Titanium Mesh : A Retrospective Review of 108 Patients
por: Kim, Jun-Ki, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Outcome and risk factors of complications after cranioplasty with polyetheretherketone and titanium mesh: A single-center retrospective study
por: Yao, Shun, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy
por: Iaccarino, Corrado, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Fenestration of bone flap during interval autologous cranioplasty
por: Nguyen, Ha Son, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Proportions of Long-term Explantations and Complications of Autologous Heterotopic Bone Graft versus Alloplastic Cranioplasties: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
por: Oberoi, Michelle, et al.
Publicado: (2021)